frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen

https://rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-space-programming/
1689•dbreunig•5h ago•546 comments

Show HN: Subvocal – Talk to your computer without making noise

488•aarushyadav•6h ago•265 comments

Anthropic's growth just flattened

https://www.regenerator1.com/p/anthropics-growth-just-flattened
105•cdrnsf•1h ago•99 comments

US boy names that became girl names and vice versa

https://namedaisy.com/blog/boy-names-that-became-girl-names
253•xoobdev•7h ago•285 comments

Launch HN: Momentic (YC W24) – Agents that catch bugs by using your app

https://momentic.ai/
110•wuweiweiwu•6h ago•72 comments

If you love a website, back it up

https://blog.mistys-internet.website/post/2026/10/29/if-you-love-a-website-back-it-up/
352•ingve•10h ago•87 comments

Apple reports fourth quarter results

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/11/apple-reports-fourth-quarter-results/
59•mfiguiere•1h ago•43 comments

Show HN: Warsaw in voxels – An interactive 3D map of the city centre

https://p.migdal.pl/warsaw-vibe-voxel/
193•stared•7h ago•35 comments

The SEC Should Block Anthropic's IPO to Protect the Public

https://www.techpolicy.press/the-sec-should-block-anthropics-ipo-to-protect-the-public/
89•cdrnsf•1h ago•49 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (November 2026)

163•whoishiring•7h ago•135 comments

Sneaking into the auditorium for the Windows 2000 launch rehearsal

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20261102-00/?p=112818/
88•ibobev•5h ago•30 comments

Egoless Mathematics in the AI Era

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/11/02/egoless-mathematics-in-the-ai-era/
95•smilelamp•4h ago•73 comments

Self-Employed? Solopreneur? NIST Has a Cybersecurity Guide Just for You

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/11/self-employed-solopreneur-nist-has-cybersecurity-gu...
59•tomrod•6h ago•18 comments

Ubuntu still has not released patch for Linux 0day RCE in almost 3 weeks

https://freenode.net/article/ubuntu-lts-kernels-still-unfixed-for-critical-cve-2026-98432
264•majorchord•5h ago•51 comments

A Conversation with Paul Masurel, Creator of Tantivy

https://www.paradedb.com/blog/tantivy-interview
7•philippemnoel•2d ago•0 comments

WTF Ubuntu?

https://chalmovsky.com/posts/wtf-ubuntu
1254•chalmovsky•9h ago•572 comments

Polyend releases the Tracker firmware source code

https://polyend.com/whats-up/tracker-the-biggest-update-yet/
64•austinallegro•6h ago•12 comments

Oracle files to sell $20B in new stock, bonds to finance AI buildout

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/11/02/oracle-files-to-sell-20-billion-in-new-stock-bonds-to-finance-ai-...
137•smartmic•4h ago•95 comments

The Ford Privacy Promise: You're in Control of Your Data

https://www.fromtheroad.ford.com/us/en/articles/2026/introducing-the-ford-privacy-promise
10•KoftaBob•2h ago•6 comments

Bitmovin (YC S15) Is Hiring Technical Graduates in Denver (Engineering/CS Focus)

https://bitmovin.com/careers/8660599002/
1•slederer•6h ago

Skill to Create Product Videos

https://github.com/aaitor/skill-video-studio
54•aaitor•5h ago•17 comments

We halved DNS build delay and cut memory use by 85%

https://blog.cloudflare.com/dns-targeted-zone-builds/
130•wondersky•9h ago•44 comments

When Modernization Breaks Working Code: A Study of LLMs on Legacy PHP

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40269
13•tambourine_man•1d ago•9 comments

C64 Basic Dungeon Crawler: Stairs, Levels and Levelling Up (Part 11)

https://retrogamecoders.com/c64-basic-dungeon-part11/
53•ibobev•8h ago•8 comments

SLAC researchers find proof of altermagnetism, a new magnetic phase

https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/news/2026-10-29-slac-researchers-find-proof-altermagnetism-new-mag...
7•gmays•2h ago•3 comments

LongCat-2.5: Native Multimodality for Agentic Tasks

https://longcat.ai/blog/longcat-2.5/
74•pretext•8h ago•21 comments

Making Peace with the Projective Plane

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2026/11/02/projective-plane/
22•ibobev•6h ago•13 comments

Moving our warehouse off DuckDB

https://posthog.com/blog/moving-off-duckdb
149•emschwartz•7h ago•106 comments

BYD sold more EVs last month than the US did all quarter

https://electrek.co/2026/11/02/byd-sold-more-evs-last-month-than-the-us-did-all-quarter/
217•cisc•2h ago•210 comments

Agentic backdoors via pretraining poisoning

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37741
83•gmays•5h ago•28 comments
Open in hackernews

The SEC Should Block Anthropic's IPO to Protect the Public

https://www.techpolicy.press/the-sec-should-block-anthropics-ipo-to-protect-the-public/
85•cdrnsf•1h ago

Comments

davidguetta•1h ago
Are the pensions fund not "automatically" investing in anthropic as soon as it's public because it's in the S&P 500 (like spacex) ?
gloryjulio•1h ago
Spacex is not included in sp500 yet. Nasdaq is the one fast tracked spacex to dump on the retails
andriy_koval•58m ago
Many funds use Russel indexes, which included SpaceX already
JumpCrisscross•51m ago
Many funds use lots of indices. Very few dollars are being forced to buy these offerings.
andriy_koval•49m ago
Russel indexes are used by very large funds, e.g. vanguard usually track russel
edoceo•31m ago
Which Vanguard and at which weight?
andriy_koval•22m ago
the largest 2.3T is https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VTI/ which tracks CSRP which fasttracked SPaceX
derektank•4m ago
To be clear, while the CRSP fast tracked SpaceX’s admission to their total market index, that policy (which states that if a security's total market cap is larger than the breakpoint of the CRSP US Small Cap Index, it is can be added after 5 days of trading) has been in place for at least a decade. Unlike SpaceX’s admission to the Nasdaq, this did not represent a change in policy.
derektank•45m ago
The Russell indices, and other indices like the CRSP total market index, might include newly public companies like SpaceX, but the relative weight of them in the index will be float-adjusted, so a company like SpaceX that has kept a lot of its shares locked up will be underrepresented in the index compared to a more established public company.
andriy_koval•24m ago
Per https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-SPCX/ SpaceX curreng float is 4.29B shares or about 600B USD, not that small grab from pension funds.
nh23423fefe•13m ago
its like 2.5% of nasdaq. any crsp tracking fund would be 0.2%
judge2020•59m ago
The S&P 500 denied early admission to SpaceX.
phyzix5761•28m ago
There's a 12 month waiting period plus the company has to show 4+ quarters of positive net earnings before qualifying to be included.
millspore•1h ago
Does inclusion in S&P 500 even happen fast enough after IPO to matter here, thought there was usually a wait period before index funds have to buy in?
JumpCrisscross•52m ago
No.
msy•49m ago
The SEC's obligation is to all market participants, not just index fund holders.
cgio•27m ago
Arguably if you consciously choose to invest on a stock there should be no protection or obstacle other than regulated controls. For indices I see the point of extra protection. Where it gets murky is when you look at retirement funds, where you still have no control, but that should be regulation on the funds themselves rather than the stock.
sandworm101•49m ago
These days? All rules are maybe this or maybe that depending on political winds.

Frankly, no company should be allowed to IPO without showing steady profit. An exchange or index that promotes IPOs of unprofitable companies diminishes its reputation, and the reputation of all other stocks it indexes.

Anthropic is free to continue selling shares privately. They can setup a website and take cc payments if the care so much.

packetlost•28m ago
JumpCrisscross•50m ago
This is so dumb. Let the market figure it out. If it goes public and crashes, we get a valuable answer that saves tens of billions of wasted capital investment. If it floats, the dude who posts nonsense math can keep filling his subscriptions.
andy_ppp•47m ago
But we all know markets aren’t rational, I’m unconvinced we shouldn’t step in… if I started selling anthrax the government would try to stop me. This product might malfunction and show people how to make said anthrax which would be bad. Same with most things, everyone thinks this is a bubble. I think we should actually just put a cap on how much hardware data centres can buy per year, that would be the sensible solution tbh.
digitaltrees•44m ago
Please edit the first sentence out. Keep it civil.

As far as your claim, it's fine to say let the market sort it out, but perhaps consider that pension funds and index funds now represent a market distortion that means anthropic crashing is harder and even if it does would happen after the mandatory purchases by the index funds which is basically a transfer from the public to the insiders at anthropic

yorwba•28m ago
Maybe the SEC should instead block funds from distorting the market by making large predictable transactions, then.
phyzix5761•27m ago
There's a 12 month waiting period plus the company has to show 4+ quarters of positive net earnings before qualifying to be included in the S&P 500. Pension and index funds are gonna be ok.
zer00eyz•48m ago
It's going to get hammered into oblivion long before it gets to where it can end up on sp500. The election, and what happens after may see them delaying the IPO (if I was one to bet)

But it also sort of doesn't matter. Anthropic, not in sp500, ends up a fail then the "bubble" pops and the sp500 gets ugly.

fullshark•42m ago
Why do you think they will delay the IPO? I bet there's enough demand to buy their stock.
xur17•29m ago
> if I was one to bet

You can do exactly that on Polymarket and make good money if you are right.

stockresearcher•42m ago
There’s plenty of argument about how if a company has an IPO then they are, by definition, part of the market. And if you bought an index fund that means to represent a part of the market that this company is in, then that company should be in the index fund.

You had lots of choices, you made this choice, and you can always change your mind. Do we really need to have the government step in to prevent you from having to choose something else?

thinkingtoilet•13m ago
Yes. There are too many people entire retirements on the line to hide behind the usual song and dance people do around this. What's the alternative. Let them proceed, the bubble burst, tank the market, then have the poorest and least equipped people to manage a recession just suffer? This is exactly what a government for the people could do. Or we could just keep letting rich assholes destroy everything with no consequences.
nh23423fefe•8m ago
The poorest least equipped people don't have money in the market. Are you suggesting the SEC is capable of stopping a recession from occuring?
demo4567•41m ago
The SEC should SEC to protect the public.
cowlevel•30m ago
The SEC doesn't exist to play favourites. If Anthropic has broken a law they can be blocked for that. If not, then it would be unfair to them to block them for things that other companies with IPOs have done. Live by market primacy, die by market primacy.
jawiggins•28m ago
This author seems to be focused on if Anthropic will continue to grow and return value in the future. But it's disappointing that no one has questioned why they waited so long to go public. If they had gone public at a $100b evaluation, everyday people and pension funds could have invested in and seen the returns that AI has already delivered. Instead, Anthropic leadership runs around saying how AI need to benefit society as a whole rather than a select few, meanwhile they have kept the benefit of >$1t for themselves and refused to share it with others.
thevinter•23m ago
A year ago Anthropic was losing billions per year. I'm sure that if it had listed and then collapsed everyone would've gone "first they run around saying how AI needs to benefit society and then they dump a cash-burning company on pension funds"
NewJazz•22m ago
Better to dump it when valuation is low instead of inflated.
jawiggins•20m ago
But pension funds are already invested in them through the VC funds. The only difference is (more) people would be able to invest in Anthropic without paying management fees to middlemen.
xvector•5m ago
Most 401ks and pension funds do not invest in pre IPO companies, this is just blatant misinformation
xienze
singron•22m ago
If Anthropic can't easily pay all these commitments, what are the odds that they get all their creditors together and negotiate a mini chapter 11 (e.g. by adding 5 years to the commitment timelines, or canceling a proportion of each commitment)? The creditors have no interest in Anthropic going under, and with enough advanced notice, they can pause or cancel their own investments and probably take reduced losses.
stingraycharles•21m ago
If the SEC allowed the SpaceX IPO they most certainly will allow the Anthropic IPO. From my point of view, the Anthropic IPO is a much more genuine one than the shenanigans that were going on with SpaceX, yet we’re all investing into that through ETFs as well.

Additionally, some ETFs have built in protections to rule out businesses that are not yet profitable (like SpaceX and Anthropic), which I think is a great rule.

applebottomjean•18m ago
If companies were already profitable why would they go public?
stingraycharles•7m ago
To let early investors exit? Most private funds like that have a horizon of 10 years, so they want to sell their investments at some point.
alistairSH•19m ago
Seems like requiring an audit might be the solution to this issue? Why they (or anybody) can go public, with financials that are little more than a pinky-swear, is beyond me.
wqtz•14m ago
The SEC is less of a protective agency and more of a revenue-generating agency (in practice and to some degree in principle). If Anthropic does not go public, you have nothing to stop them from receiving private funding from sovereign wealth funds. You have to understand that the Vision Fund failure did not mean that overnight sovereign wealth funds stopped making money; they are desperate to invest in private companies, and if you look at some of the, ahh... "stories"... you do not see massive non-Western investment in AI companies yet. But they are sitting on a mountain of cash.

Moreover, every branch and division across the US government recognizes one thing... the public market is plateauing. It is not a numbers thing; it is a sentiment thing. The post-pandemic tech boom needs to continue, at least be stabilized. AI's expectation to hit the public market is largely keeping a lot of the momentum going.

If Anthropic does not enter the public market, it is going to be a major distressing event for SEC who make money from regulatory fees and a shit ton of fees from publicly listed companies. There is zero incentive to stop them. The SEC tries its best for the benefit of publicly listed companies, exchanges, brokers, institutional investors etc. who all benefit from the IPO.

wmf•13m ago
The only real argument here is that Anthropic has Q3 numbers but they aren't included in the prospectus because they may be bad. Delaying the IPO by a few weeks would solve that problem.
titanomachy•10m ago
> the number of Americans using AI at work fell significantly between the summers of 2025 (46%) and 2026 (33%).

Surprising. I couldn't find the study they're citing, and they didn't include a link. Anecdotally, my friends across various industries (tech, finance, medicine, scientific research) are all using AI more heavily as time goes on.

zzzeek•3m ago
I'm sorry, evacuate? In our moment of triumph?
> Frankly, no company should be allowed to IPO without showing steady profit

This is directly counter to the original point of public markets at all

phyzix5761•31m ago
12 month waiting period plus 4+ quarters of profitable earnings before you qualify for inclusion.
•
8m ago
Aren't they still losing billions per year?