Is it possible to be used on bigger models with the same gains?
ngruhn•10m ago
No idea if the paper has merit but the UI is slop:
- gradient headline
- random vertical scrollbar on mobile
- fingernail cards
dofm•8m ago
> - fingernail cards
I did not know that this was the name for these but I am glad I now do :-)
whizzter•7m ago
Really, started looking at the page and the slop trigger hit quickly enough for me to just skim the structure of the page and close it.
ElectricalUnion•9m ago
What is the point of using a outright ancient model like DeepSeek-R1-Distill-1.5B from 2025 based on another ancient model like Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B from 2024, when a much better modern model like LFM3-1.7B exists?
anushka_gandhi•4m ago
We have tested it on all kinds of small models including LFM3-1.7B. Our goal is to make a a system that can compress any AI. This is our first version and with your feedback we can improve.
NitpickLawyer•2m ago
This is a well known tell for using (bad) models to do "research". They always use qwen2.5 and R1, because of the amount of "news" that the two models received. So the models "suggest" those lineages a lot. The local llama sub used to get a few of these a day. That and a zenodo "paper" link are clear tells of badly written stuff.
mapcars•6m ago
So this is very good for making local models more accessible, right?
fishfasell•4m ago
I know a gen AI UI when I see one and this has all of the red flags. Hate to say it but I feel like that compromises the legitimacy of this
Xunjin•15m ago