It is worth noting that of the 3 things you listed, none are a single disease. They're all descriptions of a wide range of conditions, and that aligns with my understanding of aging in general: so much stuff goes wrong that rather than describe the individual source, we describe its effects.
That also aligns with my (non-medical-expert) intuition.
Dario et al are smart enough to know that as well, and they have not presented any compelling counterargument to the speed of biology, which makes me they that they are full of shit and know it.
”It's literally too dangerous for us to release"
Stock market goes down
"Ai will cure cancer everyone!"
"One person (who doesn't know the future but has a financial incentive to promise golden age) promises golden age.
Other people (who also don't know the future but don't want to lose their jobs) predict that they won't lose their jobs.
Both sides can be utterly wrong, so we spend our time in vain here".
Which one? All of them? The mechanisms of neoplastic development and growth are protean. If his prediction is based on aspirations of finding a common pathway, I’m afraid it will be unrealized.
I share his enthusiasm for assisted drug development and so forth; but let’s be realistic. Besides, doesn’t his company have an upcoming IPO? I guess it’s a fine time for unbridled optimism then, isn’t it?
sandworm101•15m ago
>> In a 42-minute IPO roadshow video the company released on Tuesday, Amodei made the audacious prediction that "cancer, Alzheimer's, heart disease, mental illness — these will be relics of the past in, I think, less than a decade."
Mental illness? I'm sure that will be worked out exactly a day after AI-induced psychosis stops being a thing.
Question: Without heart disease, cancer and Alzheimer's, what will kill us? It cannot all be shark attacks and avalanches. What new horrible diseases will step up to be big killers in the future?
BugsJustFindMe•7m ago