i keep asking code agent to review another agents' work, and every round a new agent points at something the last one missed. i tried compound engineering or superpowers to put more disciplines on the plan and the code, still didn't work. as the complexity grows, the loops get longer, and i'm sitting in between like copy-pasting machine.
so, convergo.
the idea is to guide both sides better — the builder and the reviewer — and one rule i care about: an issue the reviewer sees should never be treated as a single issue. it should be read and reflected on before it's fixed.
lately with fable, hybrid loops were introduced, where fable holds the taste and codex does the execution.