Hi fellow founder here, just sharing some thoughts. Agree that with AI more eng work can now be handled by a senior dev but a good junior dev using AI is also more capable than ever. I think with a good process in place, you can ramp up a junior dev sooner rather than later. And as good as AI is, there's still a human bottleneck, so I'd assess the quantity of work you have vs. the technical complexity

It's a tough time to make those decisions. I really don't know what juniors will do. Continuity is a real cost, but a long term one. So, early on definitely doesn't make sense, especially when you are laying a foundation. But afterwards, you have to have some form of continuity to maintain the product and the cheapest and best way would be to bring on young talent.

hire them. that's my thought.

> So far, I'm really struggling to see the value add of a junior engineer given how good the models have become. A senior with Max plan beats three junior hires (very rough estimate).

A single staff-level engineer with 4 concurrent agents on a Max plan replaces 4 seniors and 12 junior hires.

It's okay to say that we want don't need to hire any human programmers anymore since they are the bottleneck. But the strong disadvantage is that these agents need humans to tell them what to do.

If you think otherwise, look no further than the Huggingface hack and what happens when they run completely autonomously. Not only that is a waste of tokens, it can cause you to be legally liable for damages if something terrible happens.