But your laptop's Ethernet adapter comes free with your laptop (both in terms of money and waiting to get it since it's already on your desk) and possibly even more importantly you know the laptop manufacturer and users have QAed it for you so it's absolutely going to behave the way you expect which is important when the device you're designing isn't behaving.
> your laptop's Ethernet adapter
The device as-designed likely wouldn't work with your laptop's ethernet adapter - hence why the author of TFA placed an isolation transformer and jack ...on a breakout board.
Did they remove support for the Ethernet jack on the Minis available in Ukraine? It looks like it's still present on the WiFi board, next to the power jack.
The wifi chip may emit signal during boot. The device may get accidentally reset in the field. SpaceX may push an update that messes with the settings.
Cutting down on mass would make sense, though.
I know people do that sort of thing for evaluation kits, but it doesn't seem like a good idea for production.
Aspos•8h ago
100721•7h ago
mattmaroon•7h ago
michaelt•7h ago
mft_•7h ago
mattmaroon•7h ago
michaelt•6h ago
There are alternatives if you only need short range, or if you can tolerate high latency. And of course there are fire-and-forget cruise missiles that don't need communications at all.
But there aren't all that many other options. Historically, satellite internet companies like Iridium, Globalstar and Teledesic have not fared well.
lxgr•5h ago
It only gained packed-switched data with the second generation satellite network, but data rates are still very low (think hundreds of kbps, and I believe even that needs high-gain antennas).
NitpickLawyer•4h ago
edit: it was Viasat not Iridium, I got them mixed up.
RF_Savage•4h ago
NitpickLawyer•3h ago
snickerdoodle12•2h ago
maxlin•5h ago
The thing came with a clear limit "this thing works in these cells of this big hex grid". And they drove it off that hex grid. Plan and simple.
Its like if the US-supplied HIMARS came with some built-in limit that it cannot be used to target known Russian nuclear installments, and they'd try to do that.
It's not that those things are unquestionable, but they are limits that would need US consultation as US obviously doesn't want the thing to escalate from being a defensive war to something else.
karp773•3h ago
coryrc•2h ago
TMWNN•8m ago
burnt-resistor•6h ago
dylan604•5h ago
Aspos•5h ago
kubelsmieci•3h ago
littlestymaar•6h ago
tomaskafka•6h ago
gruez•5h ago
The author's youtube channel also contains a video of him doing a speedtest on a starlink mini while driving on a highway.
michaelt•2h ago
Unless there's a software limit built in that turns them off, or the drone's doing some crazy high-G-force acrobatics.
codedokode•5h ago
Also as I understand, satellites do not work over Russian territory so guess where this can be used.
Andrew_nenakhov•4h ago
tenuousemphasis•7h ago
mattmaroon•7h ago
someothherguyy•7h ago
rozhok•18m ago