Elliptical Python Programming

https://susam.net/elliptical-python-programming.html

184•sebg•1y ago

Comments

benob•1y ago

TIL that in python, 1--2==3

seplox•1y ago

It's not a python thing. 1-(-2), distribute the negative.

qsort•1y ago

In most C-like languages that would be a syntax error. E.g. in C and C++ as a rule you tokenize "greedily", "1--2" would be tokenized as "1", "unary decrement operator", "2", which is illegal because you're trying to decerment an rvalue.

Python doesn't have "--", which allows the tokenizer to do something else.

nyrikki•1y ago

In C, that is really because Unary minus (negation) has precedence over binary operations.

    +a - b; // equivalent to (+a) - b, NOT +(a - b)
    -c + d; // equivalent to (-c) + d, NOT -(c + d)

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_arithmet...

    +-e; // equivalent to +(-e), the unary + is a no-op if “e” is a built-in type
     // because any possible promotion is performed during negation already

The same doesn't apply to, !! Which is applied as iterated binary operations (IIRC)

I am pretty sure the decriment operator came around well after that quirk was established.

seanhunter•1y ago

Peter van der Linden’s book “Expert C Programming” (which is awesome btw) says that one of them (Kernighan, Richie or maybe Ken Thompson I forget) realised early on that the c compiler had the wrong operator precedence for bit twiddling and unary and boolean operators but “at that stage we had a few thousand lines of C code and thought it would be too disruptive to change it”

j2kun•1y ago

Also worth noting that `1 - -2` works and produces 3 in C because the space breaks the operator.

plus•1y ago

For those who are curious, `...` is a placeholder value in Python called Ellipsis. I don't believe it serves any real purpose other than being a placeholder. But it is an object and it implements `__eq__`, and is considered equal to itself. So `...==...` evaluates to `True`. When you prefix a `True` with `-`, it is interpreted as a prefix negation operator and implicitly converts the `True` to a `1`, so `-(...==...)` is equal to `-1`. Then, you add another prefix `-` to turn the `-1` back into `1`.

`--(...==...)--(...==...)` evaluates to `2` because the first block evaluates to 1, as previously mentioned, and then the next `-` is interpreted as an infix subtraction operator. The second `-(...==...)` evaluates to `-1`, so you get `1 - -1` or `2`.

When chaining multiple together, you can leave off the initial `--`, because booleans will be implicitly converted to integers if inserted into an arithmetic expression, e.g. `True - -1` -> `1 - -1` -> `2`.

> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

This article is obviously completely tongue-in-cheek, but I feel the need to point out that this sentence is not meant to be a complete inversion of the Perl philosophy of TIMTOWTDI. The word "obvious" is crucial here - there can be more than one way, but ideally only one of the ways is obvious.

pletnes•1y ago

Numpy actively uses … to make slicing multidimensional arrays less verbose. There are also uses in FastAPI along the lines of «go with the default».

abuckenheimer•1y ago

excellent explanation, to add to this since I was curious about the composition, '%c' is an integer presentation type that tells python to format numbers as their corresponding unicode characters[1] so

'%c' * (length_of_string_to_format) % (number, number, ..., length_of_string_to_format_numbers_later)

is the expression being evaluated here after you collapse all of the 1s + math formatting each number in the tuple as a unicode char for each '%c' escape in the string corresponding to its place in the tuple.

[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/string.html#format-specifi...

nomel•1y ago

Expanding on this a little, I will be replacing all occurrences of 2 with two blobs fighting, with shields:

    >>> 0^((...==...)--++--(...==...))^0
    2

rmah•1y ago

>> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

Except for package management, of course. There, we need lots and lots of ways.

blooalien•1y ago

And apparently string formatting which should have an ever growing number of ways to handle it. :shrug:

elijahbenizzy•1y ago

Ok do this but for JavaScript

voidUpdate•1y ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSFuck

mariocesar•1y ago

If you're curious, the code in ellipsis results in executing:

    print('hello, world')

mturmon•1y ago

Thank you!

I noticed some ** and * in the thing sent to eval(), which (given that the building blocks are small integers) seemed related to prime factorizations.

The initial %c is duplicated 21 times (3*7, if I read correctly), and then string-interpolated (%c%c%c...) against a long tuple of integers. These integers themselves are composed of products of factors combined using * and **.

There is also one tuple "multiplication" embedded within that long tuple of integers -- (a,b)*2 = (a,b,a,b). That is for the 'l' 'l' in "hello".

It's all very clever and amusingly mathy, with a winking allusion to the construction of natural numbers using sets. It made me Godel.

callamdelaney•1y ago

I think we're really starting to over crowd pythons syntax and I'm not a fan.

noddleah•1y ago

you're telling me you never program in python elliptically??

acbart•1y ago

Pretty sure this would have been possible in Python 2.6. The Ellipsis object has been around for a very long time.

MadVikingGod•1y ago

This behavior can be replicated with any class that has two special methods: __neg__ that returns -1 and __sub__ that accepts ints and returns 1-other.

For example if you make this class:

  class _:
       def __neg__(self):
           return -1
       def __sub__(self, other):
           return 1-other

You get similar behavior:

  >>> --_()
  1
  >>> _()--_()
  2

Fun python for everyone.

maxloh•1y ago

You can do this on JavaScript too.

  alert(1)
  // equals to:
  [][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]][([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([][[]]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]]((![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[+!+[]+[+!+[]]]+[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[!+[]+!+[]]])()

https://jsfuck.com/

The Bromine Chokepoint: How Strife Could Halt Production of World’s Memory Chips

Vercel April 2026 security incident

A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)

I wrote a CHIP-8 emulator in my own programming language

Show HN: Faceoff – A terminal UI for following NHL games

Swiss authorities want to reduce dependency on Microsoft

I learned Unity the wrong way

Archive of BYTE magazine, starting with issue #1 in 1975

Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7

Notion leaks email addresses of all editors of any public page

Game devs explain the tricks involved with letting you pause a game

The seven programming ur-languages (2022)

Nanopass Framework: Clean Compiler Creation Language

KTaO3-Based Supercurrent Diode

SPEAKE(a)R: Turn Speakers to Microphones for Fun and Profit [pdf] (2017)

Eliza a Play by Tom Holloway

The RAM shortage could last years

Show HN: Shader Lab, like Photoshop but for shaders

What are skiplists good for?

College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

Reverse Engineering ME2's USB with a Heat Gun and a Knife

NIST scientists create 'any wavelength' lasers

Blue Origin's rocket reuse achievement marred by upper stage failure

Show HN: Prompt-to-Excalidraw demo with Gemma 4 E2B in the browser (3.1GB)

Anonymous request-token comparisons from Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.7

Reading Input from an USB RFID Card Reader

The electromechanical angle computer inside the B-52 bomber's star tracker

4-bit floating point FP4

Why Japan has such good railways

The world in which IPv6 was a good design (2017)