Elliptical Python Programming

https://susam.net/elliptical-python-programming.html

184•sebg•7mo ago

Comments

benob•7mo ago

TIL that in python, 1--2==3

seplox•7mo ago

It's not a python thing. 1-(-2), distribute the negative.

qsort•7mo ago

In most C-like languages that would be a syntax error. E.g. in C and C++ as a rule you tokenize "greedily", "1--2" would be tokenized as "1", "unary decrement operator", "2", which is illegal because you're trying to decerment an rvalue.

Python doesn't have "--", which allows the tokenizer to do something else.

nyrikki•7mo ago

In C, that is really because Unary minus (negation) has precedence over binary operations.

    +a - b; // equivalent to (+a) - b, NOT +(a - b)
    -c + d; // equivalent to (-c) + d, NOT -(c + d)

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_arithmet...

    +-e; // equivalent to +(-e), the unary + is a no-op if “e” is a built-in type
     // because any possible promotion is performed during negation already

The same doesn't apply to, !! Which is applied as iterated binary operations (IIRC)

I am pretty sure the decriment operator came around well after that quirk was established.

seanhunter•7mo ago

Peter van der Linden’s book “Expert C Programming” (which is awesome btw) says that one of them (Kernighan, Richie or maybe Ken Thompson I forget) realised early on that the c compiler had the wrong operator precedence for bit twiddling and unary and boolean operators but “at that stage we had a few thousand lines of C code and thought it would be too disruptive to change it”

j2kun•7mo ago

Also worth noting that `1 - -2` works and produces 3 in C because the space breaks the operator.

plus•7mo ago

For those who are curious, `...` is a placeholder value in Python called Ellipsis. I don't believe it serves any real purpose other than being a placeholder. But it is an object and it implements `__eq__`, and is considered equal to itself. So `...==...` evaluates to `True`. When you prefix a `True` with `-`, it is interpreted as a prefix negation operator and implicitly converts the `True` to a `1`, so `-(...==...)` is equal to `-1`. Then, you add another prefix `-` to turn the `-1` back into `1`.

`--(...==...)--(...==...)` evaluates to `2` because the first block evaluates to 1, as previously mentioned, and then the next `-` is interpreted as an infix subtraction operator. The second `-(...==...)` evaluates to `-1`, so you get `1 - -1` or `2`.

When chaining multiple together, you can leave off the initial `--`, because booleans will be implicitly converted to integers if inserted into an arithmetic expression, e.g. `True - -1` -> `1 - -1` -> `2`.

> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

This article is obviously completely tongue-in-cheek, but I feel the need to point out that this sentence is not meant to be a complete inversion of the Perl philosophy of TIMTOWTDI. The word "obvious" is crucial here - there can be more than one way, but ideally only one of the ways is obvious.

pletnes•7mo ago

Numpy actively uses … to make slicing multidimensional arrays less verbose. There are also uses in FastAPI along the lines of «go with the default».

abuckenheimer•7mo ago

excellent explanation, to add to this since I was curious about the composition, '%c' is an integer presentation type that tells python to format numbers as their corresponding unicode characters[1] so

'%c' * (length_of_string_to_format) % (number, number, ..., length_of_string_to_format_numbers_later)

is the expression being evaluated here after you collapse all of the 1s + math formatting each number in the tuple as a unicode char for each '%c' escape in the string corresponding to its place in the tuple.

[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/string.html#format-specifi...

nomel•7mo ago

Expanding on this a little, I will be replacing all occurrences of 2 with two blobs fighting, with shields:

    >>> 0^((...==...)--++--(...==...))^0
    2

rmah•7mo ago

>> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

Except for package management, of course. There, we need lots and lots of ways.

blooalien•7mo ago

And apparently string formatting which should have an ever growing number of ways to handle it. :shrug:

elijahbenizzy•7mo ago

Ok do this but for JavaScript

voidUpdate•7mo ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSFuck

mariocesar•7mo ago

If you're curious, the code in ellipsis results in executing:

    print('hello, world')

mturmon•7mo ago

Thank you!

I noticed some ** and * in the thing sent to eval(), which (given that the building blocks are small integers) seemed related to prime factorizations.

The initial %c is duplicated 21 times (3*7, if I read correctly), and then string-interpolated (%c%c%c...) against a long tuple of integers. These integers themselves are composed of products of factors combined using * and **.

There is also one tuple "multiplication" embedded within that long tuple of integers -- (a,b)*2 = (a,b,a,b). That is for the 'l' 'l' in "hello".

It's all very clever and amusingly mathy, with a winking allusion to the construction of natural numbers using sets. It made me Godel.

callamdelaney•7mo ago

I think we're really starting to over crowd pythons syntax and I'm not a fan.

noddleah•7mo ago

you're telling me you never program in python elliptically??

acbart•7mo ago

Pretty sure this would have been possible in Python 2.6. The Ellipsis object has been around for a very long time.

MadVikingGod•7mo ago

This behavior can be replicated with any class that has two special methods: __neg__ that returns -1 and __sub__ that accepts ints and returns 1-other.

For example if you make this class:

  class _:
       def __neg__(self):
           return -1
       def __sub__(self, other):
           return 1-other

You get similar behavior:

  >>> --_()
  1
  >>> _()--_()
  2

Fun python for everyone.

maxloh•7mo ago

You can do this on JavaScript too.

  alert(1)
  // equals to:
  [][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]][([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([][[]]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]]((![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[+!+[]+[+!+[]]]+[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[!+[]+!+[]]])()

https://jsfuck.com/

Linux on the Fujitsu Lifebook U729

6B Miles Driven

The Nature of the Beast: Charles Le Brun's Human-Animal Hybrids (1806)

Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.today

The Internet Is Cool. Thank You, TCP

How to write type-safe generics in C

AI World Clocks

The Pen and the Spade: The Poems of Seamus Heaney

Messing with Scraper Bots

One Handed Keyboard

So, you want to design your own language? (2017)

Streaming AI Agent Desktops with Gaming Protocols

Can text be made to sound more than just its words? (2022)

Activeloop (YC S18) Is Hiring MTS(Back End)and AI Search Engineer

Unofficial Microsoft Teams client for Linux

A new Google model is nearly perfect on automated handwriting recognition

Lawmakers want to ban VPNs and have no idea what they're doing

Kagi Bloopers – Search Results Gone Wrong

History and use of the Estes AstroCam 110

Löb and Möb: Loops in Haskell (2013)

HipKittens: Fast and furious AMD kernels

Go's Sweet 16

SSL Configuration Generator

'No One Lives Forever' turns 25 and you still can't buy it legitimately

Spec-Driven Development: The Waterfall Strikes Back

All praise to the lunch ladies

Blending SQL and Python with Sqlorm

Driving TFEL with RP2040: Offloading the CPU step by step (2021)

Random Font – a typographic experiment exploring randomness [pdf]

No Leak, No Problem – Bypassing ASLR with a ROP Chain to Gain RCE