Used these can be found for cheap, and short of MPE, hammer action, and a build for touring these might have everything a MIDI controller needs.
Layers, splits, onboard programmability, plenty of controls, DIN ports, USB, and afterfouch (but like the author's keyboard, the faders are always missing the custom keycaps for the non-standard size fader stems).
They are a plastic fantastic in gorgeous oughties silver.
What I meant is that used Axioms are usually missing keycaps.
But they can be found cheap and have many great features. Plus the keybed is ok’ish.
OP if you want to improve sight reading faster, I would recommend using non-random notes - context is very important when sight reading and if you get a professional pianist to sight read random notes they will be much, much slower.
Sight reading factory is one site I know that does this a bit better
An interesting middle ground might be using LLMs to generate plausible melodies based on real-world music patterns and emphasizing the unfamiliar patterns, but if the goal is to play real music fluently, nothing beats practicing with actual pieces from the repertoire you want to play.
I imagine it would be far more engaging (but also far more complicated) to tap into an archive of songs and present those randomly, either selected by or transposed into the key that you want to practice.
A bit like when people tell you to learn Morse code, not to learn it letter by letter.
Fun fact, during WW2 there were lots of encrypted transmissions over Morse code, and lots of folk (often women, in the UK at least) had the job to transcribe them. They would then be passed on to the cryptoanalytics specialists in Bletchley Park. I guess other countries had similar arrangements.
So they would sit 8h+ a day and transcribe what looked like garbage to them.
I'm a fairly average pianist, but sight reading is a (relative) strength. Being able to play random notes is definitely part of it, but I think for me sight-reading is more about getting a sense of the gist of the music (a lot of pattern matching of common phrases, cadences, hand positions etc) - this is kind of subconcious, then my focus is on keeping my internal version aligned with what's on the page (spotting where the written music is doing something different or interesting and making sure you hit those notes). The latter part would definitley improve by practicing random notes, but the first bit is more akin to improvisation - you've got some lossy, distilled version of the music in your head (from memory or from your first mental parse of the full manuscript) and you're trying to recreate it (or expound on it).
I think what really helped my reading was having lots of cheap/free sheet music on hand and just trying to play it (simplifying massively if needed, but trying to get the sense of it, even if only playing 20% of the notes)
It's the difference between learning to recognise letters and learning to read words. Music is made of words - scale-specific gestures, of which there are hundreds, perhaps thousands, typically arranged in some kind of harmonic context so you can make reasonable guesses about what's coming next.
This matters because finger positions have to be optimised for the smoothest and fastest motion. Piano sheet music usually includes this information, but random note sequences won't.
All of it contributes to look-ahead, where you're reading a bar or two ahead of the music to give your brain time to assemble the finger movements it's going to need.
This made me think of typing tutor programs that just prompt for random letters. I type like shit on those-- slow and inaccurate.
On the other hand, I'm quick and reasonably accurate when typing English words and frequently-used command lines.
The analogy would surely hold true with musical instruments. Even with my limited experience playing musical instruments I can't imagine trying to practice random notes and rhythms. On the face of it I would think it would have little to no value. (Effectively practicing to play unlistenable music...)
I learnt touch typing on a physical mechanical typewriter. The syllabus that I followed did seem random but as I kept at it I could see there was a method to the madness.
I checked out a few software tutorials and they seemed OK. Maybe there are some not good ones.
(You said “typing tutors programs” but my memory is of actual tutors, as in, people.)
You may not like practicing random notes but maybe you want to play Schönberg or Bartók?
kkk kik kik k,k k,k jjj juj juj jmj jmj hhh hyh hyh hnh hnh
...on a lovely, bangy, ink-scented IBM Selectric in typing class. Which at the time felt like a meaningless exercise, but absolutely strengthened the ability of my fingers to find the right keys in a hurry without looking at the keyboard.
It was mentioned the person was trying to memorize all these with anki or something. There's actually no need. You only need to memorize 2 key signatures and the rest follow a pattern.
C major has 0 sharps/flats F major has 1 flat
Every sharp key is a half step up from the last sharp shown. G major has 1 sharp F#. G is a half step up from F#. In A major the last sharp is G#, etc.
In flat keys, it's the second flat to the right. Bb has two flats in the signature. Bb and Eb. Ab has 4 where Ab is the 3rd.
All minor keys are a minor third down from their major key. Of course, you have to look at more of the music to determine if it is a in major or minor key.
If you can remember that you can tell what any key signature is pretty quickly.
Is this what self-taught looks like? I have never heard of that mnemonic and it was never hard to learn the order of sharps/flats in a key signature. You just look at the way it's written on the staff - two lines of sharps a 4th apart going up progressively, two lines of flats a 4th apart going down progressively.
I don't want to discourage the guy, but practicing every day for 4 years straight and he's only gotten to 60bpm... there are better methods to learn piano sight reading.
You don't have to learn music theory yourself, so long as theory is something someone knew in the past to design how you learn. What matters is that you learn the useful patterns, why those patterns are useful is not something you need to know (except if you are trying to break the rules - understanding the rules means you understand what happens when you break them and thus can come up with good breakages instead of unmusical noise)
Edit:
I used singing in quotes because you only really intonate (generate an accurate pitch with your voice). You don't learn actual singing technique.
b. What does GAS mean?
"Gear Acquisition Syndrome", a common meme particularly among online musician communities around the desire for more gear whether or not you actually need it just to have it
I want to sight-read chords, chord progressions, and other patterns, and get better at playing those.
Thanks for writing this up, I'm definitely going to incorporate this into my practice routine
chthonicdaemon•3d ago
sherdil2022•3d ago
However, meanwhile I am learning the basic skills - starting with chord progressions in different keys (and as a side effect learning different scales) - and I am able to enjoy learning and playing music without the stress and anxiety of sight reading.
I have found a teacher (online from London) who follows this harmony first approach - and it has really changed the game for me.
Different approach and journey - but the destination is probably the same.
chthonicdaemon•3d ago
Playing with other people also highlights other perhaps unexpected skills. I played in a band for a while and I still retain the skill of reading chords off other player's hands. You also need to be able to respond to someone just shouting "OK, let's go to C minor" in ways that only matter in that context. When you're listening or sight reading, you don't need names.
sherdil2022•3d ago
That is why JazzSkills.com really worked for me. You can find several free videos on their YouTube channel - https://m.youtube.com/@JazzSkills
I almost gave up on learning and playing music after struggling for years / decades - and by happenstance came across JazzSkills few years ago. And since then every single day I get joy in learning and playing music.
apercu•5h ago
brusselssprouts•5h ago
You can do the same thing where you configure it to just one key, start with the basic triads, etc.
djtango•5h ago
Nothing quite as crushing as seeing people sight read things that would take you months/years to learn with the score... :)
Thanks for sharing your journey!
CGMthrowaway•2h ago
criddell•4h ago
I'm not tracking my music practice (maybe I should) but I've been wearing a health tracker for years and have collected a ton of data. None of it seems very actionable because there have been no surprises.
SoftTalker•3h ago