I put a link to[1] in the article, which was previously discussed here[2] with a correction to that article. Basically there's a 2 byte length header on TCP DNS responses, limiting the payload (i.e. the DNS message inside) to 64 KiB.

  [1]: https://www.netmeister.org/blog/dns-size.html#:~:text=65536%20bytes%20DNS%20payload%20%2B%202%20bytes%20size%20%3D%2065538%20bytes
  [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39257147

Cool!

For the bad apple one; I tried something like that, it works if you're directly querying the authoritative DNS server, but if a cache is involved the records will be re-ordered by randomisation (even in some cases with TTL=0). That's why I ended up doing this as a single very long record, because then it can be cached without worrying about reordering.

Is it? Most firewalls I see allow no inbound by default (although all outbound)

FUN! And who knows, maybe this will lead to something later. Many discoveries or inventions were built on things people didn’t know the use of at the time.

Better question: Why not? :)