My Ed(1) Toolbox

https://aartaka.me/my-ed.html

89•mooreds•4mo ago

Comments

michaelsshaw•4mo ago

ed is the standard text editor!

https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.en.html

hejira•4mo ago

Hilarious! WYGIWYG :-D

mkovach•4mo ago

Funny thing about ed: While it is still one of my most common commands, it is also my dad's name. So, I've spent my entire career regularly typing my father's name at work.

tniemi•4mo ago

I used to use EDLIN on my MS/DOS days...

marttt•4mo ago

BTW, its FreeDOS version is still being updated fairly frequently. :) Current version 2.24 is from May 2024.

zabzonk•4mo ago

Ah, ed. Back in the mid 80s, I had to teach a course on Unix & its tools - if I remember correctly it was called "Unix - a modern OS". One of those tools was of course ed. We couldn't use vi because the termcap/terminfo settings were screwed up for the physical serial terminals we had - I eventually fixed this & felt very pleased with myself, as those terminal config files are a b*tch.

Still, teaching bash, C and the usual suspects along with ed was very strenuous for the students, and for me - we only ran the course once.

pveierland•4mo ago

Wild implementing Ed in Brainfuck: https://github.com/bf-enterprise-solutions/ed.bf/blob/master...

uncircle•4mo ago

Shorter than I would have imagined.

jacobvosmaer•4mo ago

I like ed but I prefer 'sam -d' (the terminal mode of Sam). It has a nice looping construct 'x' and you can open multiple files and do batch edits (with 'X').

There is a Go port of Sam, which is easy to install:

go install 9fans.net/go/cmd/sam@latest

http://sam.cat-v.org/

marttt•4mo ago

+1, structural regular expressions are a joy to use.

https://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/sam_lang_tutorial/sam_tut.pd...

Also interesting, with other derivates of ed -- LineEditorFamily in the TextEditors Wiki: https://texteditors.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?LineEditorFamily

secwang•4mo ago

love it.

secwang•4mo ago

Aaron have a crossplatform ed in Apl.This is great when you familiar with apl.

praptak•4mo ago

https://web.archive.org/web/20250924125053/https://aartaka.m...

jonathaneunice•4mo ago

When even “IDEs are complete overkill—just use vi” sounds like weakness and the entitlement of modern youth, seek out the ed fan pages!

ed isn’t quite flipping binary toggle switches to load your program, but close enough to deliver the joy of brutal minimalism along with a nostalgic waft of yesteryear.

whartung•4mo ago

  > ed isn’t quite flipping binary toggle switches to load your program, but close enough to deliver the joy of brutal minimalism along with a nostalgic waft of yesteryear.

No, that would be Teco, or, more “all we had were zeros”, ED on CP/M.

ED is, well, miserable. It’s a character editor, vs a line editor, and you had the joys of paging in chunks of your file into working memory.

I, personally, find command line character editors especially difficult. I find it very hard to maintain my context and, of course, who doesn’t just love counting characters for commands.

shawn_w•4mo ago

I don't use ed interactively but find it's really useful in shell scripts that need to edit files - heredocs or piping printf output (like one example in the article; never felt a need for something like his xed). Even used it in a C program via popen() to edit settings in a config file.

ed is underrated.

(I'm responsible for suggesting GNU ed accept posix EREs; think I got the idea from NetBSD's version)

baudaux•4mo ago

ed is the first program I put in exaequOS (https://exaequos.com), an OS fully running in the Web browser. For testing ed, you can open a terminal and type 'ed'

Martin_Silenus•4mo ago

Forget it, you won't be able to be funnier than the 1991 TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA. This is unbeatable.

mikeocool•4mo ago

After reading this article, I need to learn :wq for ed.

Edit - I suppose that shouldn't have been surprising:

michaelsshaw•4mo ago

Vi comes from ex, which itself came from ed.

aartaka•4mo ago

Both GNU ed and OpenBSD ed support wq as an extension to POSIX. But yeah, it all depends on whether you want to stick by POSIX or common practice. I personally prefer wq for interactive sessions and w\nq for scripts.

hejira•4mo ago

Is there really an advantage to using Ed instead of vim in any situation whatsoever? (Assuming you're totally comfortable with vim)

balou23•4mo ago

Very low bandwidth situations, or when you want to apply the same steps to other files afterwards.

But if you're totally comfortable with vim you'd better use ex, which basically is both an extension to ed, and the non-interactive part of vim.

aartaka•4mo ago

Not to be that person, but… ex is not ed-compatible, and it made really bad choices too.

3nt3•4mo ago

when you're using a teletype terminal

Tiny C Compiler

You Are Here

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes

The F Word

Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions

Speed up responses with fast mode

LLMs as the new high level language

Software factories and the agentic moment

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

GitBlack: Tracing America's Foundation

Stories from 25 Years of Software Development

FDA intends to take action against non-FDA-approved GLP-1 drugs

Show HN: A luma dependent chroma compression algorithm (image compression)

Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and working with Disney

First Proof

Italy Railways Sabotaged

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

I write games in C (yes, C) (2016)

Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

Selection rather than prediction

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

72M Points of Interest

A Fresh Look at IBM 3270 Information Display System

Coding agents have replaced every framework I used

Unseen Footage of Atari Battlezone Arcade Cabinet Production

France's homegrown open source online office suite

Show HN: Kappal – CLI to Run Docker Compose YML on Kubernetes for Local Dev