frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Apt Rust requirement raises questions

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1046841/5bbf1fc049a18947/
112•todsacerdoti•1h ago•151 comments

Launch HN: Onyx (YC W24) – The open-source chat UI

51•Weves•1h ago•26 comments

Human brains are preconfigured with instructions for understanding the world

https://news.ucsc.edu/2025/11/sharf-preconfigured-brain/
272•XzetaU8•9h ago•171 comments

Pebble Watch software is now open source

https://ericmigi.com/blog/pebble-watch-software-is-now-100percent-open-source
1151•Larrikin•21h ago•209 comments

Meta Segment Anything Model 3

https://ai.meta.com/blog/segment-anything-model-3/?_fb_noscript=1
111•alcinos•5d ago•26 comments

Making Crash Bandicoot (2011)

https://all-things-andy-gavin.com/video-games/making-crash/
84•davikr•4h ago•7 comments

Most Stable Raspberry Pi? Better NTP with Thermal Management

https://austinsnerdythings.com/2025/11/24/worlds-most-stable-raspberry-pi-81-better-ntp-with-ther...
223•todsacerdoti•9h ago•73 comments

Brain has five 'eras' with adult mode not starting until early 30s

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/nov/25/brain-human-cognitive-development-life-stages-cam...
97•hackernj•2h ago•83 comments

Unpowered SSDs slowly lose data

https://www.xda-developers.com/your-unpowered-ssd-is-slowly-losing-your-data/
615•amichail•20h ago•252 comments

Nearby peer discovery without GPS using environmental fingerprints

https://www.svendewaerhert.com/blog/nearby-peer-discovery/
34•waerhert•4d ago•13 comments

Broccoli Man, Remastered

https://mbleigh.dev/posts/broccoli-man-remastered/
80•mbleigh•5d ago•33 comments

Using an Array of Needles to Create Solid Knitted Shapes

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3746059.3747759
54•PaulHoule•3d ago•11 comments

Claude Advanced Tool Use

https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/advanced-tool-use
577•lebovic•20h ago•240 comments

Mary Beard: Hollywood Lied to You About Ancient Rome. Here's the Truth

https://kottke.org/25/11/mary-beard-hollywood-lied-to-you-about-ancient-rome-heres-the-truth
32•bookofjoe•6d ago•32 comments

Show HN: I built an interactive HN Simulator

https://news.ysimulator.run/news
429•johnsillings•22h ago•196 comments

Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3

https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/three-years-from-gpt-3-to-gemini
320•JumpCrisscross•2d ago•244 comments

A million ways to die from a data race in Go

https://gaultier.github.io/blog/a_million_ways_to_data_race_in_go.html
107•ingve•3d ago•91 comments

How the Atomic Tests Looked Like from Los Angeles

https://www.amusingplanet.com/2016/09/how-atomic-tests-looked-like-from-los.html
76•ohjeez•3d ago•56 comments

Implications of AI to schools

https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1993010584175141038
293•bilsbie•22h ago•327 comments

Rethinking C++: Architecture, Concepts, and Responsibility

https://blogs.embarcadero.com/rethinking-c-architecture-concepts-and-responsibility/
48•timeoperator•5d ago•45 comments

Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing

https://spectrum.ieee.org/it-management-software-failures
8•pseudolus•3h ago•0 comments

Cool-retro-term: terminal emulator which mimics look and feel of CRTs

https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term
268•michalpleban•22h ago•103 comments

What OpenAI did when ChatGPT users lost touch with reality

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/23/technology/openai-chatgpt-users-risks.html
243•nonprofiteer•1d ago•401 comments

Show HN: OCR Arena – A playground for OCR models

https://www.ocrarena.ai/battle
183•kbyatnal•3d ago•55 comments

Build a Compiler in Five Projects

https://kmicinski.com/functional-programming/2025/11/23/build-a-language/
162•azhenley•1d ago•33 comments

Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

https://creolened.com/windows-gui-good-bad-and-pretty-ugly-ranked/
46•phendrenad2•10h ago•81 comments

The history of Indian science fiction

https://altermag.com/articles/the-secret-history-of-indian-science-fiction
185•adityaathalye•3d ago•35 comments

Explaining, at some length, Techmeme's 20 years of consistency

https://news.techmeme.com/250912/20-years
18•nhf•3d ago•8 comments

Claude Opus 4.5

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-5
1040•adocomplete•21h ago•474 comments

Dumb Ways to Die: Printed Ephemera

https://ilovetypography.com/2025/11/19/dumb-ways-to-die-printed-ephemera/
34•jjgreen•5d ago•29 comments
Open in hackernews

Launch HN: Onyx (YC W24) – The open-source chat UI

50•Weves•1h ago
Hey HN, Chris and Yuhong here from Onyx (https://github.com/onyx-dot-app/onyx). We’re building an open-source chat that works with any LLM (proprietary + open weight) and gives these LLMs the tools they need to be useful (RAG, web search, MCP, deep research, memory, etc.).

Demo: https://youtu.be/2g4BxTZ9ztg

Two years ago, Yuhong and I had the same recurring problem. We were on growing teams and it was ridiculously difficult to find the right information across our docs, Slack, meeting notes, etc. Existing solutions required sending out our company's data, lacked customization, and frankly didn't work well. So, we started Danswer, an open-source enterprise search project built to be self-hosted and easily customized.

As the project grew, we started seeing an interesting trend—even though we were explicitly a search app, people wanted to use Danswer just to chat with LLMs. We’d hear, “the connectors, indexing, and search are great, but I’m going to start by connecting GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, and Qwen to provide my team with a secure way to use them”.

Many users would add RAG, agents, and custom tools later, but much of the usage stayed ‘basic chat’. We thought: “why would people co-opt an enterprise search when other AI chat solutions exist?”

As we continued talking to users, we realized two key points:

(1) just giving a company secure access to an LLM with a great UI and simple tools is a huge part of the value add of AI

(2) providing this well is much harder than you might think and the bar is incredibly high

Consumer products like ChatGPT and Claude already provide a great experience—and chat with AI for work is something (ideally) everyone at the company uses 10+ times per day. People expect the same snappy, simple, and intuitive UX with a full feature set. Getting hundreds of small details right to take the experience from “this works” to “this feels magical” is not easy, and nothing else in the space has managed to do it.

So ~3 months ago we pivoted to Onyx, the open-source chat UI with:

- (truly) world class chat UX. Usable both by a fresh college grad who grew up with AI and an industry veteran who’s using AI tools for the first time.

- Support for all the common add-ons: RAG, connectors, web search, custom tools, MCP, assistants, deep research.

- RBAC, SSO, permission syncing, easy on-prem hosting to make it work for larger enterprises.

Through building features like deep research and code interpreter that work across model providers, we've learned a ton of non-obvious things about engineering LLMs that have been key to making Onyx work. I'd like to share two that were particularly interesting (happy to discuss more in the comments).

First, context management is one of the most difficult and important things to get right. We’ve found that LLMs really struggle to remember both system prompts and previous user messages in long conversations. Even simple instructions like “ignore sources of type X” in the system prompt are very often ignored. This is exacerbated by multiple tool calls, which can often feed in huge amounts of context. We solved this problem with a “Reminder” prompt—a short 1-3 sentence blurb injected at the end of the user message that describes the non-negotiables that the LLM must abide by. Empirically, LLMs attend most to the very end of the context window, so this placement gives the highest likelihood of adherence.

Second, we’ve needed to build an understanding of the “natural tendencies” of certain models when using tools, and build around them. For example, the GPT family of models are fine-tuned to use a python code interpreter that operates in a Jupyter notebook. Even if told explicitly, it refuses to add `print()` around the last line, since, in Jupyter, this last line is automatically written to stdout. Other models don’t have this strong preference, so we’ve had to design our model-agnostic code interpreter to also automatically `print()` the last bare line.

So far, we’ve had a Fortune 100 team fork Onyx and provide 10k+ employees access to every model within a single interface, and create thousands of use-case specific Assistants for every department, each using the best model for the job. We’ve seen teams operating in sensitive industries completely airgap Onyx w/ locally hosted LLMs to provide a copilot that wouldn’t have been possible otherwise.

If you’d like to try Onyx out, follow https://docs.onyx.app/deployment/getting_started/quickstart to get set up locally w/ Docker in <15 minutes. For our Cloud: https://www.onyx.app/. If there’s anything you'd like to see to make it a no-brainer to replace your ChatGPT Enterprise/Claude Enterprise subscription, we’d love to hear it!

Comments

nawtagain•1h ago
Congrats on the launch!

Can you clarify the license and if this actually meets the definition of Open Source as outlined by the OSI [1] or if this is actually just source available similar to OpenWebUI?

Specifically can / does this run without the /onyx/backend/ee and web/src/app/ee directories which are licensed under a proprietary license?

1 - https://opensource.org/licenses

Weves•58m ago
Yes, it absolutely does! The chat UX, add-ons (deep research, code interpreter, RAG, etc.), and SSO are MIT licensed. Most deployments of Onyx are using the pure FOSS version of Onyx. Many individuals / teams have done extensive white labeling (something that OpenWebUI doesn't allow).

We have https://github.com/onyx-dot-app/onyx-foss, for a fully MIT licensed version of the repo if you want to be safe about the license/feel freedom to modify every file.

phildougherty•1h ago
Honestly surprised something like this can get funded
kurtis_reed•46m ago
why?
xenospn•23m ago
there's a million other project just like this one, many that are much more advanced and mature, including from Vercel. There's no moat.
Weves•42m ago
"Chat UI" can "feel" a bit thin from an eng/product when you initially think about, and that's something we've had to grapple with over time. As we've dug deeper, my worry about that has gone down over time.

For most people, the chat is the entrypoint to LLMs, and people are growing to expect more and more. So now it might be basic chat, web search, internal RAG, deep research, etc. Very soon, it will be more complex flows kicked off via this interface (e.g. cleaning up a Linear project). The same "chat UI" that is used for basic chat must (imo) support these flows to stay competitive.

On the engineering side, things like Deep Research are quite complex/open-ended, and there can be huge differences in quality between implementations (e.g. ChatGPTs vs Claude). Code interpreter as well (to do it securely) is quite a tricky task.

mritchie712•31m ago
w24, those were different times.
rao-v•53m ago
I was pretty excited for Onyx as a way to stand up a useful open source RAG + LLM at small scale but as of two weeks ago it was clearly full of features ticked off a list that nobody has actually tried to use. For example, you can scrape sites and upload docs but you can’t really keep track of what’s been processed within the UI or map back to the documents cleanly.

It’s nice to see an attempt at an end to end stack (for all that it seems this is “obvious” … there are not that many functional options) but wow we’ve forgotten the basis of making useful products. I’m hoping it gets enough time to bake.

Weves•31m ago
Really appreciate the feedback (and glad to hear the core concept resonated with you).

The admin side of the house has been missing a bit of love, and we have a large overhaul coming soon that I'm hoping addresses some (most?) of your concerns. For now, if you'd like to view documents that have been processed, you can check out the `Explorer` panel on the left.

In general, I'd love to hear more about what gives it that "unbaked" feel for you if you're up for a quick chat.

tomasphan•51m ago
This is great, the value is there. I work for a F100 company that is trying (and failing) to build this in house because every product manager fundamentally misunderstands that users just want a chat window for AI, not to make their own complicated agents. Your biggest competition in the enterprise space, Copilot, has terrible UI and we only put up with it because it has access to email, SharePoint and Teams.
katzskat•44m ago
I immediately thought of Google's Agentspace when I saw this product. The value for me sits in its ability to do RAG via connectors.
Weves•23m ago
RAG + connectors is a huge reason why people deploy Onyx (enterprise search roots means we do a pretty good job there).

Also, open-source works really here, since connectors are a long-tail game. We've tried to make it easy to add connectors (a single python interface), and as a result over half of our connectors are contributed by the community. We expect that percentage to grow over time. This means that compared to something like Agentspace, we'll very likely be connected to all of the key tools at your company (and if we aren't, you can easily add an integration).

Weves•28m ago
Haha, yea we've seen that exact story many times! Dissatisfied with Copilot and building a (not great) internal solution that is missing polish + most of the "advanced" feature set.
awaseem•27m ago
This is awesome and love that its open source!
Weves•19m ago
Thanks! Open source is awesome :)
mentalgear•23m ago
A bit like mastra.ai - my goto SOTA solution for these kind of LLM flow coordinations (though more dev-focused). (yes I realise this is more user-facing)
Der_Einzige•22m ago
Sorry, but why use this over oobabooga/sillytavern?

Why do we have to yet again poorly copy an oversimplified UI?

The value of local models comes from their huge amount of settings/control that they offer. Why must we throw that all away?

Yet again, the world waits for good UI/UX for pro/prosumers with AI systems. No one is learning from ComfyUI, Automatic1111, or SillyTavern. No, LM-Studio is not actually prosumer

dberg•20m ago
how is this different from Librechat?
Weves•7m ago
Some of the key differences:

1/ large connector suite + good RAG. Answers at scale is hard, and from our enterprise search roots, we've spent a lot of time with it. It's something that many teams expect from their chat UI.

2/ deep research + open-source code interpreter.

3/ simpler UX. LibreChat has a lot of customizability exposed front and center to the user, which is great for the power user but can be overwhelming for someone new to using AI systems.

hobofan•5m ago
LibreChat has recently been acquired by ClickHouse, so who knows what their future holds.
_pdp_•17m ago
> We’re building an open-source chat that works

As long as you have Pricing on your website your product is not open source in the true spirit of open sourceness. It is open code for sure but it is a business and so incentive is to run it like a business which will conflate with how the project is used by the community.

Btw, there is nothing wrong with that but let's be honest here if you get this funded (perhaps it already is) who are you going to align your mission with - the open source community or shareholders? I don't think you can do both. Especially if a strong competitor comes along that simply deploys the same version of the product. We have seen this story many times before.

Now, this is completely different from let's say Onyx being an enterprise search product where you create a community-driven version. You might say that fundamentally it is the same code but the way it is presented is different. Nobody will think this is open-source but more of "the source is available" if you want to check.

I thought perhaps it will benefit to share this prospective here if it helps at all.

Btw, I hear good things about Onyx and I have heard that some enterprises are already using it - the open-source version.

wg0•11m ago
Actually - if you have bunch of VCs on your back, you can't even align with your very own user base let alone any other wider community.
pablo24602•14m ago
Congrats on the launch! Every enterprise deserves to use a beautiful AI chat UI (and Onyx is a fantastic and easy to try option).
KaoruAoiShiho•11m ago
I've been using Cherry Studio, works great.
panki27•8m ago
What does this do that OpenWebUI (or one of the many of other solutions) does not?