frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

European Commission Trials Matrix to Replace Teams

https://www.euractiv.com/news/commission-trials-european-open-source-communications-software/
154•Arathorn•2h ago

Comments

butvacuum•1h ago
If they can't pass chat control- Simply adopt something full of holes but seems reasonable.
sunbum•1h ago
What?
robtherobber•1h ago
I think the intention was never to get their communication audited (potentially via poor security), but ours. You know, to protect the children and all that.
AndrewKemendo•1h ago
Help me here

Why can’t a company in the EU make a secure video/voice chat app?

There’s are EU companies that make teams alternatives:

https://euroalternative.eu/alternatives/microsoft-teams

Even if those don’t work SAP, Dassault, etc… make massively complex software and services across multiple verticals and could trivially ship a competitor

arielcostas•1h ago
Why reinvent the wheel when there are already open standards like Matrix or XMPP that can be adapted to your use case?
AndrewKemendo•1h ago
Matrix isn’t a 1:1 replacement for teams
NewJazz•1h ago
Explain
input_sh•1h ago
...thank god?
arielcostas•1h ago
Depends on what features of teams you use, since it kind-of became an "everything" app
steve1977•59m ago
Teams minus the bloat and bugs?
pyrale•1h ago
> Why can’t a company in the EU make a secure video/voice chat app?

What makes you think they can't?

Microsoft's corporate edge isn't merely the product, it's also an army of sales, entrenched corporate markets/clients, lock-in, etc.

You could have a better version of their product and still get eaten alive.

m4rtink•1h ago
And don't forget Copilot! ;-)
repelsteeltje•1h ago
In the Netherlands, a lot of government systems aren't procured from the Microsofts of this world. There are a lot of middle men (consultancy agencies) involved that over the years have helped build a strong ecosystem with lots of expertise around Microsoft and related suppliers.

So indeed, it's not like you can just replace a software product (or service) by some EU or open alternative. And there are huge vested interests.

kuerbel•35m ago
Same in Germany. I think in any European country.
saubeidl•1h ago
The french government recently did: https://github.com/suitenumerique/meet
blitzar•1h ago
Jitsi

Formerly - skype

Matrix

cardanome•1h ago
I mean German police is using Palantir.

There is nothing magic about Palantir, especially not about the subset of Palantir that the German police uses as we have stricter data privacy laws.

You might think that would be a strategic risk not worth taking especially with the US getting more hostile towards Europe but here we are.

Why? Honestly I don't have a good answer other than well the whole system is rotten, corruption, lobbyism, take your pick.

badc0ffee•1h ago
The idea of the likes of SAP spinning up a new product quickly and painlessly seems like a joke.
Arathorn•1h ago
Element’s topco may be UK based for now, but the vast majority of our business and footprint is in the EU - https://element.io/en/about. All but one of our mobile app team is in the EU for instance (and when we started, the UK was too :|)
iso1631•1h ago
Zoom came along with a securre video/voice chat, sure it's American, but it was by far the world leader

Microsoft then used its monopoly in office tools to push Teams to everyone

You can't compete with a trillion dollar company offering your product as a bundle your clients already pay for, even if your product is better. Even VC money runs out eventually

steve1977•55m ago
To be fair, Microsoft already had Skype (for Business) and NetMeeting before that. It's not like they were new to that market. NetMeeting existed for more than a decade before Zoom even came into existence.

Zoom had COVID-19 play in it's favor, that's about it.

Y-bar•16m ago
Zoom has long been the most unsecure video/voice application.

Remember how they installed an open web server on people's computers which could be accessed by anyone through the web?

https://infosecwriteups.com/zoom-zero-day-4-million-webcams-...

Apple had to step in and patch it for them:

https://techcrunch.com/2019/07/10/apple-silent-update-zoom-a...

Or when they sent your chat data to Facebook?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/zoom-ios-app-sends-data-to-f...

How it was discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22703000

Or when Zoom was leaking private information?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/zoom-leaking-email-addresses...

Or do you remember how those geniuses rolled their own crypto?

https://citizenlab.ca/research/move-fast-roll-your-own-crypt...

Or maybe you remember that Zoom has the ability to listen in in real-time on meetings held on their platform?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55372493

simianwords•1h ago
I don’t know how Teams even got the approval to be released. It must be so embarrassing to be Satya and be forced to use this shitty piece of software.

I can’t believe that software of this quality is used so widely. Market competitive forces are not able to do their thing unfortunately.

soperj•1h ago
I felt the same way when I was forced to use Word over Wordperfect, and Powerpoint over Harvard Graphics
librasteve•1h ago
errr market monopoly forces are doing their thing … the point is that only a govt can force eg an OS + APP anticompetitive monopoly provider to split up into multiple companies
kuerbel•37m ago
It's because of the licenses mostly. If you buy e.g. business standard or business premium or whatever you want to make the most of it. Hey, there is a free chat app included, and it integrates so well with the rest of m365!

(Also most people don't know that you can still use a KMS with/for office 2024. You don't need M365.)

neom•1h ago
I'm surprised Mattermost doesn't get more love generally, it's fully oss isn't it? https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost
trueismywork•1h ago
No. It's not fully OSS.
Arathorn•1h ago
it’s also not decentralised (unless you bridge it to Matrix), nor end-to-end-encrypted. or standards based.
ronsor•1h ago
To be fair, why would you care if your internal organization or company chat is decentralized?
pseudalopex•1h ago
The article said secure communication with other EU bodies was a use case.
Arathorn•19m ago
If you work with lots of other entities who want full control over their own comms (e.g. other governments, other departments, other EU entities like European Parliament and Council, the UN, NATO, etc) then decentralisation or federation is a big deal.

In the public sector it's basically a requirement: it's bananas if your country's critical infrastructure ends up dependent on some a product effectively controlled by another country (e.g. Teams) - and you obviously want to be able to communicate with other govt entities rather than being stuck in an island.

Then it's a natural extension to the private sector - although for now, it feels more folks are on the "nobody got sacked for using Teams" train.

pseudalopex•1h ago
Mattermost's license statements are confusing and contradictory.[1]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46861331

cloud-oak•58m ago
I think Mattermost lost a lot of instance admins' trust when they recently decided to update the server to limit access to old messages without good reason. On self-hosted instances!

https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost/issues/34271

neom•44m ago
That's a shame, I interviewed there once, decided not to take it but it was one of the few places I could have seen myself working at, they seemed like decent folks trying to build something worthwhile.
layer8•55m ago
Anything “sovereign” should decouple the protocol from the client software IMO, which isn’t possible with Mattermost.
pm3003•34m ago
Well there's always Matterbridge. If you don't have complicated workflows to replicate (and even then) you can just replicate to XMPP, Nextcloud or whatever.
mhitza•1h ago
Can someone that uses Matrix compare it to Zulip? Which would have been my "obvious" choice.

Is it functionally comparable, discussion threads and all? Or is it much closer to something like Discord?

Arathorn•1h ago
Matrix is a decentralised encrypted chat protocol on which you could build something like Zulip, except decentralised and end-to-end encrypted.

Element is the actual app being trialled here, which feels more like Slack and/or Signal than Zulip. The point is that you get something you can selfhost while also interoperating with other deployments… while also encrypting the data end-to-end with Signal protocol.

tamimio•59m ago
Yeah I would love to see a new professional application based on Matrix, Element is buggy, other apps lacking too.
blitzar•55m ago
> Element is buggy

Someone should tell the CEO/CTO of Element

edoceo•34m ago
Arathorn is the CEO. I bet you knew that. At the time I write this your comment is grey. Maybe context was missing; or they think you're snark.
Arathorn•20m ago
Speaking as the CEO/CTO of Element... the classic Element apps on mobile were buggy, thanks to being a ~10 year old codebase with no shared code between platforms and effectively the 1st generation Matrix client. Which is why we replaced them over the last few years with Element X, with all the heavy lifting shared between iOS & Android via matrix-rust-sdk (effectively a 3rd gen Matrix SDK).

That said, 70% of our users haven't got the memo yet - we'll do a hard-upgrade when the remaining missing features in Element X (Spaces & Threads) are fully out of Labs.

Meanwhile, Element Web is lagging behind Element X - but we're now in the middle of an incremental in-place upgrade (not a big-bang rewrite, thank goodness) to use matrix-rust-sdk - see our talk from FOSDEM last Sunday for the details: https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/DZJVTS-an-element-web...

markush_•2m ago
It’s very cool and inspiring to see the CEO posting here. Keep up the amazing work!
pm3003•29m ago
Federation can feel like "just a feature" but the E2E encryption (also in group chats) is a reason for Matrix to exist and a big reason why it's so slow.
Macha•1h ago
Matrix has threads. So does discord, but discords UI around them basically renders them functionally useless.

Anyway, the first goal listed in this project was to move to European sovereign solutions so Zulip failed at the first hurdle.

Given the (lack of) speed of European bureaucracy, this is likely more a reaction to the US sanctioning the ICC than the more recent Greenland saber rattling, but you'll probably see more of this in the future.

pseudalopex•53m ago
> Anyway, the first goal listed in this project was to move to European sovereign solutions so Zulip failed at the first hurdle.

Element Creations Ltd and The Matrix.org Foundation CIC are UK companies.

Macha•17m ago
The UK is in Europe. Brexit didn't float the country out several hundred miles.
Arathorn•15m ago
Element Software SARL and Element Software GmbH however are not. In practice I believe it's Element Software GmbH providing the European Commission deployment of ESS. (Both are owned by the UK topco, but at the current rate we might flip one of them to be the topco instead).
pseudalopex•4m ago
Subsidiaries are meaningless. Microsoft have EU subsidiaries also. And might means might not.
andrewaylett•41m ago
They are different, and the biggest reason is (I suspect) that a Zulip workspace is self-contained while a Matrix server is able to federate with other Matrix servers.

Other European institutions are also adopting Matrix, so federation may turn out to be an important feature.

stock_toaster•1h ago
zulip seems to me like it would be a better solution to me (open source, self hostible, familiar paradigm, etc), but then again, I think _anything_ would be better than teams... so more power to them!
tcfhgj•1h ago
so Matrix doesn't have self hostable open source options?
Arathorn•1h ago
https://github.com/element-hq/ess-helm (aka ESS Community) is Element’s FOSS distro fwiw.
iknowstuff•48m ago
France’s government uses Matrix. Presumably a nice perk to be able to talk to them via federation
pm3003•38m ago
Germany (government and armed forces) and NATO also use it.
cge•12m ago
I'm not sure if it ended up being used this way, but if I recall correctly, when that was being initially implemented, federation was actually a core feature: different agencies / municipalities / etc could have their own servers and control their own data and accounts, but inter-agency conversations and rooms would be well-supported, along with each agency retaining a copy of the rooms on their own servers.
ValtteriL•1h ago
Dreambroker
yabones•58m ago
My team started using Matrix/Element after years of frustration with Teams and Slack. It's far from perfect, but using a simple application with no built-in ads, AI, bloat, crap, etc is wonderful.

I really hope the EU throws some serious money at them to get the bugs worked out, add some minor features, and clean up the UX enough that an "office normie" can onboard as easily as MS.

My dream is that Matrix can do for intra-org comms what Signal did for SMS.

Teever•53m ago
The key is the money.

I’ve used matrix for years, ran my own federated server for a while.

I’ve been critical of the user experience and issues with how it’s handled by the matrix team before but I acknowledge that by and large these problems can be fixed with money.

Big players need to put their big boy pants on and throw a couple coins from their farcically large coin purse and they can drive a stake through the wretched heart that is Teams.

troyvit•44m ago
And this is the part I hope Europe gets. They don't have nearly as much money to throw at Matrix as Microsoft can throw at Teams, but they do have massive resources, and I bet that since Matrix doesn't have many of the same shitty KPIs as Slack and Teams, those resources can go much further.
pmontra•29m ago
I guess that the European Commission pays a lot of money to Microsoft in licenses. They could pay a fraction of those money to Matrix.
jaredklewis•26m ago
I don’t know much about Matrix. Maybe in this case the key is money.

But having worked at various startups and enterprises, it is very common for lots of money and resources to thrown at projects and for little or no progress to be made.

Money might be a necessary condition but it’s definitely not a sufficient one. See Microsoft teams.

Again I know nothing about Matrix, but I found your comment about UX concerning. UX is a problem that is almost immune to money. An extremely clear vision almost always the bottleneck. Money usually just results in more “features” being shoved in.

toomuchtodo•23m ago
Sometimes good enough is good enough. Slack, Teams, Matrix, whatever, as long as you're meeting most daily driving requirements, everything else is maintenance and long tail quality of life improvement (imho).

What else are Teams users going to get out of Microsoft chasing an ever increasing enterprise valuation and stock price target with regards to their user experience? Email just works, make teams comms that just works and is mostly stable.

giovannibonetti•17m ago
I think the PowerSync [1] team is missing out on an opportunity to showcase their impressive data sync technology by building a minimalist Slack clone.

[1] https://www.powersync.com/

antirez•54m ago
It's incredible in the first place that companies want people use those kind of terrible and useless software, and that people accept using it.
Arathorn•39m ago
talking about Teams, right? O:-)
uyzstvqs•50m ago
This does not bode well. Matrix is honestly not good, as someone who has tried to use it. It's slow, janky, often unstable, and poorly standardized.

My suggestion: https://threema.com/en/products/work (hosted) or https://zulip.com/ (OSS self-hosted).

simfree•47m ago
It works faster & better than Signal Desktop.
jampekka•25m ago
That's not a high bar.
Ylpertnodi•17m ago
Genuinely surprised at this - I've never heard of signal desktop not being fast, or good. Works a1 for me.
Arathorn•43m ago
When did you try it? Both Matrix the protocol and implementations like Element X have improved immeasurably over the last year or so.
uyzstvqs•24m ago
It's been more than a year, and Element X does honestly look a lot better. But it's been mobile-only for years. And if I'm correct, the desktop/web clients still require you to use embedded Jitsi. And what about non-Element clients?

As a user, I just need stuff like this to be standard, and work for every participant regardless of what client they use.

bigstrat2003•43m ago
I've been running a Matrix homeserver for a couple of years now and I've never had any issues with it. Not saying Matrix is perfect, but it is not as bad as you are making it out to be either.
tcfhgj•31m ago
Threema: proprietary, outside EU

Zulip: lacks encryption, interoperability

837263292029•20m ago
Why would they need encryption? Does the european commision have anything to hide?

Chat control for thee but not for me?

uyzstvqs•18m ago
Threema is Swiss, which is a regional EFTA member. It's end-to-end encrypted and the clients are open-source.

Zulip has client-server encryption, which is fine if you control the server.

Matl•11m ago
While I don't doubt your experience, I've been running Conduit[0] for a while now to great success (a lot simpler to configure than Synapse).

I don't think it's a fact that Matrix is not good. For MS Teams? It's pretty close to a fact.

0 - https://conduit.rs

evanjrowley•49m ago
Related, the internall messenger for NATO also uses Matrix. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41781762
heraldgeezer•27m ago
Teams takes like 4 min to boot on my work laptop.

When they launched the "new" one they proudly showed the improved boot time...

dreamteam1•22m ago
* open source

* don’t suck (too much)

* no planned rug pulls

* not infested by US or Chinese spyware

Are there any?

jhgkhl•6m ago
Microsoft Teams is such a low bar, that anything else is probably an upgrade.

GPT-5.3-Codex

https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex/
172•meetpateltech•27m ago•39 comments

Claude Opus 4.6

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-6
377•HellsMaddy•56m ago•176 comments

Unsealed Court Documents Show Teen Addiction Was Big Tech's "Top Priority"

https://techoversight.org/2026/01/25/top-report-mdl-jan-25/
47•Shamar•35m ago•16 comments

Claude Code Agent Teams

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams
45•davidbarker•45m ago•7 comments

Don't rent the cloud, own instead

https://blog.comma.ai/datacenter/
915•Torq_boi•12h ago•376 comments

The New Collabora Office for Desktop

https://www.collaboraonline.com/collabora-office/
102•mfld•4h ago•52 comments

European Commission Trials Matrix to Replace Teams

https://www.euractiv.com/news/commission-trials-european-open-source-communications-software/
155•Arathorn•2h ago•82 comments

150 MB Minimal FreeBSD Installation

https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2026/02/01/150-mb-minimal-freebsd-installation/
64•vermaden•4d ago•5 comments

Maihem (YC W24): hiring sr robotics perception engineer (London, on-site)

https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/maihem/8da3fa8b-5544-45de-a99e-888021519758
1•mxrns•1h ago

GB Renewables Map

https://renewables-map.robinhawkes.com/
93•RobinL•5h ago•36 comments

When internal hostnames are leaked to the clown

https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/02/03/badnas/
377•zdw•13h ago•201 comments

Company as Code

https://blog.42futures.com/p/company-as-code
158•ahamez•5h ago•89 comments

Programming Patterns: The Story of the Jacquard Loom

https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/jacquard-loom
57•andsoitis•4d ago•18 comments

Advancing finance with Claude Opus 4.6

https://claude.com/blog/opus-4-6-finance
20•da_grift_shift•52m ago•7 comments

A Broken Heart

https://allenpike.com/2026/a-broken-heart/
110•memalign•4d ago•33 comments

Simply Scheme: Introducing Computer Science (1999)

https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~bh/ss-toc2.html
78•AlexeyBrin•4d ago•27 comments

Show HN: Micropolis/SimCity Clone in Emacs Lisp

https://github.com/vkazanov/elcity
123•vkazanov•9h ago•30 comments

CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/5/the-world-factbook/
99•ck2•4h ago•28 comments

Making Ferrite Core Inductors at Home

https://danielmangum.com/posts/making-ferrite-core-inductors-home/
86•hasheddan•3d ago•24 comments

Nanobot: Ultra-Lightweight Alternative to OpenClaw

https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot
147•ms7892•8h ago•92 comments

Triton Bespoke Layouts

https://www.lei.chat/posts/triton-bespoke-layouts/
3•matt_d•4d ago•0 comments

Fela Kuti First African to Get Grammys Lifetime Achievement Award

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/1/fela-kuti-becomes-first-african-to-get-grammys-lifetime-a...
41•defrost•4d ago•11 comments

CG/SQL – SQL dialect compiler to C for sqlite3 mimicking stored procedures

https://ricomariani.github.io/CG-SQL-author/
18•linkdd•4d ago•8 comments

Wirth's Revenge

https://jmoiron.net/blog/wirths-revenge/
157•signa11•14h ago•70 comments

Top downloaded skill in ClawHub contains malware

https://1password.com/blog/from-magic-to-malware-how-openclaws-agent-skills-become-an-attack-surface
253•pelario•6h ago•117 comments

Sqldef: Idempotent schema management tool for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite

https://sqldef.github.io/
243•Palmik•4d ago•48 comments

Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

https://boxc.net/blog/2026/claude-code-connecting-to-local-models-when-your-quota-runs-out/
360•fugu2•4d ago•192 comments

Everyone Is Stealing TV

https://www.theverge.com/streaming/873416/piracy-streaming-boxes
21•naves•1h ago•26 comments

AI is killing B2B SaaS

https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-killing-b2b-saas
463•namanyayg•1d ago•690 comments

CIA to Sunset the World Factbook

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/cia-closes-world-factbook-online-resource/106307724
289•kshahkshah•5h ago•212 comments