frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

An interactive map of Flock Cams

https://deflock.org/map#map=5/37.125286/-96.284180
298•anjel•2h ago•75 comments

MacBook Neo

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/say-hello-to-macbook-neo/
1223•dm•7h ago•1576 comments

Does that use a lot of energy?

https://hannahritchie.github.io/energy-use-comparisons/
38•speckx•50m ago•22 comments

Something is afoot in the land of Qwen

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Mar/4/qwen/
375•simonw•5h ago•188 comments

Making Firefox's right-click not suck with about:config

https://joshua.hu/firefox-making-right-click-not-suck
181•mmsc•3h ago•116 comments

Nobody Gets Promoted for Simplicity

https://terriblesoftware.org/2026/03/03/nobody-gets-promoted-for-simplicity/
746•aamederen•9h ago•430 comments

NanoGPT Slowrun: Language Modeling with Limited Data, Infinite Compute

https://qlabs.sh/slowrun
78•sdpmas•3h ago•9 comments

Moss is a pixel canvas where every brush is a tiny program

https://www.moss.town/
103•smusamashah•10h ago•10 comments

Building a New Flash

https://bill.newgrounds.com/news/post/1607118
20•TechPlasma•1h ago•3 comments

Data Has Weight but Only on SSDs

https://cubiclenate.com/2026/03/04/data-has-weight-but-only-on-ssds-blathering/
31•LorenDB•2h ago•15 comments

The Rust Calling Convention We Deserve

https://mcyoung.xyz/2024/04/17/calling-convention/
16•cratermoon•3d ago•0 comments

“It turns out” (2010)

https://jsomers.net/blog/it-turns-out
198•Munksgaard•6h ago•68 comments

Roboflow (YC S20) Is Hiring a Security Engineer for AI Infra

https://roboflow.com/careers
1•yeldarb•3h ago

Father claims Google's AI product fuelled son's delusional spiral

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czx44p99457o
100•tartoran•1h ago•110 comments

Was Windows 1.0's lack of overlapping windows a legal or a technical matter?

https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/32511/was-windows-1-0s-lack-of-overlapping-win...
10•SeenNotHeard•1h ago•3 comments

Google ends its 30 percent app store fee and welcomes third-party app stores

https://www.engadget.com/apps/google-ends-its-30-percent-app-store-fee-and-welcomes-third-party-a...
93•_____k•1h ago•28 comments

Glaze by Raycast

https://www.glazeapp.com/
160•romac•7h ago•96 comments

Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning Guide – Unsloth Documentation

https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3.5/fine-tune
209•bilsbie•9h ago•52 comments

Raspberry Pi Pico as AM Radio Transmitter

https://www.pesfandiar.com/blog/2026/02/28/pico-am-radio-transmitter
42•pesfandiar•3d ago•20 comments

Humans 40k yrs ago developed a system of conventional signs

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2520385123
9•bikenaga•4h ago•1 comments

The View from RSS

https://www.carolinecrampton.com/the-view-from-rss/
10•Curiositry•1h ago•2 comments

Libre Solar – Open Hardware for Renewable Energy

https://libre.solar
166•evolve2k•3d ago•47 comments

Faster C software with Dynamic Feature Detection

https://gist.github.com/jjl/d998164191af59a594500687a679b98d
28•todsacerdoti•2h ago•2 comments

My Favorite 39C3 Talks

https://asindu.xyz/my-favorite-39c3-talks/
24•max_•3d ago•2 comments

MyFirst Kids Watch Hacked. Access to Camera and Microphone

https://www.kth.se/en/om/nyheter/centrala-nyheter/kth-studenten-hackade-klocka-for-barn-1.1461249
87•jidoka•8h ago•21 comments

Agentic Engineering Patterns

https://simonwillison.net/guides/agentic-engineering-patterns/
453•r4um•16h ago•256 comments

TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption, saying it makes users less safe

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly2m5e5ke4o
383•1659447091•19h ago•370 comments

RFC 9849. TLS Encrypted Client Hello

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9849.html
253•P_qRs•13h ago•122 comments

The Space Race's Forgotten Theme Park

https://daily.jstor.org/the-space-races-forgotten-theme-park/
15•anarbadalov•3h ago•1 comments

Emails to Outlook.com rejected due to a fault or overzealous blocking rules

https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/04/users_fume_at_outlookcom_email/
114•Bender•9h ago•70 comments
Open in hackernews

An interactive map of Flock Cams

https://deflock.org/map#map=5/37.125286/-96.284180
288•anjel•2h ago

Comments

owlninja•1h ago
I added one a few months ago and went to go check it, and there are 2 others almost right on top of it pointing in different directions, I guess that can't be prevented? I'm fairly certain they didn't add two more ALPRs that close to each other.
ezfe•1h ago
You can go onto Open Street Map and tidy up the data. I would recommend surveying the actual situation first to ensure you don't mess anything up.
bigwheels•1h ago
When your car gets stolen, suddenly nobody can access the data.

Are there any coordinated efforts for widespread scrubbing or removal of these parasitic devices?

dylan604•1h ago
When your car gets stolen, even with camera data, the police will not do anything.
habinero•21m ago
The city might call you in a month when it gets towed wherever it was abandoned. The cops aren't going to look for it. That happened to me once.
StayHuman•1h ago
On the "coordinated efforts" front, some anecdata:

Three separate posts on Craigslist in the Community section about Flock Cameras, trying to increase local awareness. Posted to two different cities, various posting iterations (e.g. with links / without, pics / no pics, etc.). All appeared to post fine when entered, but never saw the light of day and were marked as removed within a few minutes.

Any other subject: posts fine.

Try it yourself and see what you get.

runjake•1h ago
Great site.

Caveat: it does not seem to update camera statuses after initial reporting. I see several cameras that were removed long ago, or have been repositioned, but their old statuses remain.

CGMthrowaway•1h ago
DeFlock is powered by crowdsourced data from the OpenStreetMap community. The map is incomplete! New locations are always being added. Know of a missing ALPR? Contribute to the map: https://deflock.org/report/id
pietervdvn•1h ago
You can use https://mapcomplete.org/surveillance to delete the cameras from OSM
snailmailman•1h ago
This is a quite scary map. They are all over my local area. It may technically be possible to route a drive around them, but if you take the most convenient path between any two points at least one camera will spot you. I'd have to leave my neighborhood through back roads and enter local shopping areas through sidestreets.

This data shouldn't even be collected in the first place, let alone consolidated into a national network that any police officer can decide to spy on me through.

CGMthrowaway•1h ago
> It may technically be possible to route a drive around them

That's an interesting idea...

sodality2•1h ago
https://dontgetflocked.com/
baby_souffle•1h ago
I can't speak to flock but I know that other vendors in the space have software designed to calculate optimal locations to maximize probability at least one license plate scan for every trip taken.

Presumably that software can then be used to upsell additional cameras because with an increased density your capabilities start to approximate real-time live position tracking instead of just getting approximate locations of hot plates.

gentile•1h ago
Download osm data, extract roads and surveillance, gpd overlay how=difference, remove/edit the different osmid's, write to pbf file, convert to obf file w/ osmandmapcreator, import into OsmAnd.

Now you have turn by turn navigation around ALPRs on your phone.

Edit: link https://github.com/pickpj/Big-B-Router - I tend to find ALPRs that are missing in the OSM data, so keep on updating OSM data.

ssl-3•1h ago
> Now you have turn by turn navigation around ALPRs [that we -- regular people -- know about] on your phone [while still being observed by the ones we don't know about].

fixed that for you. :-/

iamtheworstdev•58m ago
wow. quite literally the only ones in my area are surveilling the county park / community center. that's creepy. I'll just have to assume they're doing something creepier at the public library.
burningChrome•54m ago
>> This is a quite scary map.

It can be. FLOCK data was used to put Bryan Kohberger at the scene along with other people's security camera's. Cops regularly use FLOCK camera's to get hits for criminals that have warrants for violent crime.

I can see why people are ok with them when they're used to get criminals off the streets. However, I've seen multiple times where cops initiate a felony stop (where people are pulled out at gunpoint and detained) against a car they got a hit on - only to find out the person they really wanted wasn't driving or even in the car at all.

What's interesting is businesses and houses have so many cameras nowadays that the first thing cops do when they get to the scene of a violent crime is canvas the area for camera's. So yeah, you can avoid FLOCK, but there are most likely hundreds of other camera's that will capture you driving through any given area.

ghouse•33m ago
But the cameras that the law enforcement officers canvas in the area aren't centrally aggregated and tagged with meta data such that they can be queried at scale.
xXSLAYERXx•28m ago
> However, I've seen multiple times where cops initiate a felony stop

At what point do we accept that all systems are flawed? There could be many variables as to why the perp wasn't in the car. Maybe the perp stole the car. Maybe the perp borrowed the car. Maybe these systems do not work well in fog etc etc. I don't know how we're supposed to advance technology that makes us safer without getting into these muky situations from time to time.

Firerouge•18m ago
Do you have a source to your Bryan claim?

If you look at the map, there are zero flock cameras reported in that region.

None in Moscow Idaho where the murder happened, none in Pullman where he lived, and none showed between the locations.

birdo-wordo•9m ago
Sounds like it's working as intended. These systems don't track people, they provide objective clues and evidence.
Ajedi32•5m ago
By tracking everyone at all times.
cdrnsf•1h ago
Remember, according to Flock's CEO, Deflock is a terrorist organization.
mikece•1h ago
Yes, and according to Steve Ballmer (back in the day) Linux Torvalds was a terrorist. People are allowed to say stupid things.
jLaForest•56m ago
People are allowed to say stupid things....and those people should be held accountable for the stupid things they say
hsuduebc2•12m ago
Everyone who is not content with the way I do business must be a terrorist for sure. o_o
technol0gic•11m ago
by "say stupid things," you of course mean "tell bald-faced lies"
burkaman•9m ago
I don't think this is true, I can't even find anyone else claiming this happened.
hsuduebc2•14m ago
Lol, sure it is. Ridiculous.
pietervdvn•1h ago
If you spot missing camera's - Flock or not - you can add them to OSM easily with https://mapcomplete.org/surveillance
slg•1h ago
Just anecdotally looking around my city, it's noticeable that the camera's locations have a much stronger correlation with areas of high wealth rather than high crime.
nomel•1h ago
Generally, only addicts steal from poorer people.

And, where I am, you're more likely to have a gun if you're poor, because there's more exposure to crime, resulting in a much more realistic understanding that the police won't save you in an emergency.

baggy_trough•1h ago
This is great, we can see where more cameras need to be added around the neighborhood!
cm2012•1h ago
What I am seeing is room for a lot more in my local neighborhood. Barely any coverage.
pwg•1h ago
If you know where some of them are, you can add the data yourself: https://mapcomplete.org/surveillance
cm2012•1h ago
I'm not saying the map is missing cameras, I am saying I would personally like to see more in my neighborhood (for crime reduction reasons).
ssl-3•1h ago
Can you elaborate upon the kinds of crime reduction that these systems provide?
baggy_trough•50m ago
They make it easier to arrest criminals, thereby changing the incentives for crimes.
cm2012•49m ago
Isn't it obvious?

> License plate is reported to police associated with a crime.

> Cop looks up plate number

> Flock Camera shows general status and location of that license plate.

> Cops find the car involved with the crime, preventing further criminality.

rationalist•39m ago
We're policing future crime now?

I think they made a movie about that.

ux266478•29m ago
So they're useless for crimes not involving a reported license plate? Sounds like a pretty worthless marginal gain. The Chinese have done it better since their mass surveillance apparatus isn't contingent on reported license plates, or even the involvement of a vehicle. Start a fight on the street and they'll find you. Is America really this incompetent that they can't match a 10+ year old system?
baggy_trough•17m ago
No, that's just one of the things you can search on.
ssl-3•9m ago
So what you're saying is that I can report your[1] car as being associated with a crime, and the police will show up wherever you and/or your car is and treat you like a criminal?

I love this for you!

[1] the literal you, as well as the figurative

jotux•54m ago
Maybe you could reach out to Flock directly and ask them to install cameras in your kitchen and bedroom too (for crime reduction reasons).
avsavani•1h ago
love this , give me more cameras please , fuck those criminals.
unethical_ban•48m ago
Coming 2028: Dissent is a crime
drunken_thor•1h ago
Haha Sudbury and Napanee are the only places in Canada to have them. They are tiny cities where nothing happens. Bored police officers imagining situations where they are needed.
glitcher•1h ago
In my area I'm seeing a few random ones on roadways, but mostly clusters of them in the parking lots of Home Depots, Lowes, and Wal-Marts.
doctor_radium•49m ago
Same here, but just Lowes stores. That I know of. I surveiled the two local Lowes roughly a month ago and found two cameras not mapped, which I gleefully added myself. Want to send them a snail mail complaint at some point stating they won't be getting my business until they step back from turning us into a police state.
Ajedi32•16m ago
Are they Flock cameras or bog standard CCTV?
willis936•1h ago
Woof. There is one that I basically must drive by everyday close to where I live. How can I figure out who is responsible for its installation so I can let them know how I feel (and will vote) about it?
NoSalt•55m ago
I wonder how long until the site gets taken down. You know ... to protect the children.
sanufar•51m ago
Jeez there’s a few all around my uni and surrounding areas, did not know about that at all.
tonymet•51m ago
I volunteer for my city & county , and I'm a privacy advocate, so I have an ambivalent opinion on Flock cameras. Given the completely untenable demands on law enforcement, and extreme driver recklessness , the only practical way to enforce law and order with drivers is some sort of automated surveillance.

Since covid, driver recklessness has been out of control. Running reds, extreme speed, escaping police are all common. Pedestrian and cyclist injuries and deaths remain extreme. At the same time, the public demands more oversight and constraints on police , which reduces their ability to enforce the law.

Imagine you are a policy maker, with worse driver behavior, and police force that are less able to enforce the law. What tools would you use to maintain law and order?

If you don't want surveillance, you will have to make some other tradeoffs to allow human beings to better monitor the public and enforce the law. They are not omnipotent and omniscient creatures.

rationalist•41m ago
> Running reds, extreme speed, escaping police are all common.

How do these cameras prevent those crimes?

boelboel•28m ago
Police just aren't doing their job in the US, who even knows what they're doing at this point. Basically no country had the post-covid driver issue as much as America. Some states basically halved fines lol, make them do their jobs.
habinero•22m ago
> At the same time, the public demands more oversight and constraints on police , which reduces their ability to enforce the law

Don't make excuses for them. If you're legally allowed to kill people on purpose, you (should) get oversight and tight constraints. We don't because of a lot of reasons, but we should

They get paid six figure salaries for not actually doing a whole lot, they can manage.

Ajedi32•10m ago
Could be wrong but I don't think Flock makes speed trap or red light cameras. These are license plate readers that conduct constant surveillance of everyone at all times, whether or not you've broken any traffic laws.
tmshapland•48m ago
How do we make this site mainstream? The public would really start to push back if they could so viscerally experience that they are being surveilled multiple times per day.
whimsicalism•32m ago
Much prefer camera driven enforcement to cop-on-beat driven enforcement.
saxonww•6m ago
Flock cameras aren't enforcing anything. They collect your license plate and distinguishing details of your car. It's just car X with plate Y detected at location Z at time T.

Notably, they are not used for speed detection or 'good driving' detection.

You might think that having a constantly-present, objective, impartial camera enforcing a law is better than a sometimes-present, subjective, often not impartial beat cop doing that. But that's not what Flock does. Flock just turns that 'sometimes-present' beat cop into an 'always-present' beat cop, without addressing any of the other beat cop problems.

nickstinemates•32m ago
None in my area. Time to disperse. Get out of major cities like the pandemic promised. Fill in this great country we live in. Proliferate the governments surveillance for them.
LordGrey•29m ago
Coincidentally, a nearby county has just announced that they have begun installing new Flock cameras [0].

Their stated reason is: "Along with the cameras being used to reduce crime, the sheriff’s office said they may also be used for public safety concerns, including AMBER Alerts and Silver Alerts."

The cameras are good when we're all on the happy path, but as soon as a bad actor gets involved, all of that surveillance won't look so great. History shows that the odds of that happening are decidedly non-zero.

EDIT: Searching for some info on the grant referenced in the article, it appears that a county must match 20% of the grant amount; one example is [1]. I'm sure this looks like a great deal to county officials.

[0] https://www.ketk.com/news/crime-public-safety/new-traffic-ca...

[1] https://www.beltontexas.gov/news_detail_T11_R1277.php

qup•23m ago
The odds are 100% that it will be abused.
craftkiller•25m ago
Huh, none on the upper west side in NYC. Interesting.
segmondy•11m ago
Interesting ... the police in this case are claiming to be the owners of the camera.

https://oaklandcounty115.com/2026/03/03/clarkston-man-accuse...

bob1029•11m ago
The only flock cameras indicated in my town are the canonical Home Depot arrangement. I'm pretty sure it's part of their standard operating procedures at this point. The effect these have had on the in store experience (at my location) is the primary thing that has me interested in limited deployments. Shopping at HD prior to the ALPRs was a horrible time. I think they finally caught the guy who was stealing the little screws out of the irrigation vacuum breakers. You can actually get a complete, unopened factory product most of the time now.