frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Motorola GrapheneOS devices will be bootloader unlockable/relockable

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116160393783585567
278•pabs3•4h ago•70 comments

California's Digital Age Assurance Act, and FOSS

https://runxiyu.org/comp/ab1043/
55•todsacerdoti•1h ago•33 comments

Nobody Gets Promoted for Simplicity

https://terriblesoftware.org/2026/03/03/nobody-gets-promoted-for-simplicity/
43•SerCe•1h ago•16 comments

TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption, saying it makes users less safe

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly2m5e5ke4o
79•1659447091•3h ago•43 comments

Graphics Programming Resources

https://develop--gpvm-website.netlify.app/resources/
38•abetusk•2h ago•3 comments

Speculative Speculative Decoding (SSD)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03251
22•E-Reverance•1h ago•0 comments

Weave – A language aware merge algorithm based on entities

https://github.com/Ataraxy-Labs/weave
63•rs545837•3h ago•24 comments

MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/apple-introduces-macbook-pro-with-all-new-m5-pro-and-m5-max/
721•scrlk•15h ago•730 comments

Welcoming Elizabeth Barron as the New Executive Director of the PHP Foundation

https://thephp.foundation/blog/2026/02/27/welcoming-elizabeth-barron-new-executive-director/
7•ulrischa•2d ago•0 comments

Claude's Cycles [pdf]

https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/papers/claude-cycles.pdf
554•fs123•18h ago•231 comments

Mac external displays for designers and developers, part 2

https://bjango.com/articles/macexternaldisplays2/
28•fragmede•2h ago•12 comments

Mount Mayhem at Netflix: Scaling Containers on Modern CPUs

https://netflixtechblog.com/mount-mayhem-at-netflix-scaling-containers-on-modern-cpus-f3b09b68beac
23•vquemener•2d ago•6 comments

Voxile: A ray-traced game made in its own engine and programming language

https://elbowgreasegames.substack.com/p/voxray-games-pushes-major-update
142•spacemarine1•8h ago•37 comments

The largest acidic geyser has been putting on quite a show

https://www.usgs.gov/observatories/yvo/news/echinus-geyser-back-action-now
34•1659447091•3h ago•1 comments

Textadept

https://orbitalquark.github.io/textadept/
97•giancarlostoro•2d ago•19 comments

You can use newline characters in URLs

https://lemire.me/blog/2026/02/28/you-can-use-newline-characters-in-urls/
41•chmaynard•3d ago•19 comments

A pretty looking web for a quantum mechanics tool

https://github.com/Jamessfks/mace
5•Jamessfks123•3d ago•0 comments

When AI writes the software, who verifies it?

https://leodemoura.github.io/blog/2026/02/28/when-ai-writes-the-worlds-software.html
189•todsacerdoti•12h ago•177 comments

Number Research Inc

https://numberresearch.xyz/
8•eieio•2h ago•6 comments

Intel's make-or-break 18A process node debuts for data center with 288-core Xeon

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intels-make-or-break-18a-process-node-debuts-for-...
266•vanburen•10h ago•225 comments

GPT‑5.3 Instant

https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-3-instant/
316•meetpateltech•11h ago•245 comments

An Interactive Intro to CRDTs (2023)

https://jakelazaroff.com/words/an-interactive-intro-to-crdts/
112•evakhoury•9h ago•21 comments

Vibe coding for PMs

https://www.ddmckinnon.com/2026/02/11/my-%f0%9f%8c%b6-take-on-vibe-coding-for-pms/
39•dmckinno•5h ago•38 comments

Launch HN: Cekura (YC F24) – Testing and monitoring for voice and chat AI agents

76•atarus•14h ago•19 comments

We've freed Cookie's Bustle from copyright hell

https://gamehistory.org/cookies-bustle/
108•sb057•9h ago•15 comments

LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/03/llms-can-unmask-pseudonymous-users-at-scale-with-surpris...
29•Gagarin1917•2h ago•10 comments

Don't become an engineering manager

https://newsletter.manager.dev/p/dont-become-an-engineering-manager
329•flail•14h ago•241 comments

130k Lines of Formal Topology: Simple and Cheap Autoformalization for Everyone?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03298
20•PaulHoule•5h ago•9 comments

Physics Girl: Super-Kamiokande – Imaging the sun by detecting neutrinos [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3m3AMRlYfc
456•pcdavid•14h ago•75 comments

TorchLean: Formalizing Neural Networks in Lean

https://leandojo.org/torchlean.html
80•matt_d•3d ago•11 comments
Open in hackernews

TikTok will not introduce end-to-end encryption, saying it makes users less safe

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly2m5e5ke4o
76•1659447091•3h ago

Comments

maest•1h ago
Do you feel safer knowing DMs are not encrypted?
sethops1•1h ago
Nobody should feel safe using the TikTok client, period.
tartoran•1h ago
Neither Instagram/Facebook's Messenger/WhatsApp.
tamimio•1h ago
And signal
derwiki•1h ago
What do you use for messaging?
modernpacifist•59m ago
Obviously carrier pigeons carrying messages encrypted with post-quantum ciphers where keys have been sent ahead of time using USPS because no one would be so rude as to read someone elses mail.
tamimio•25m ago
I have been using simpleX for some time now.
mullingitover•1h ago
Not just the TikTok client, anything made by Oracle is risky.
sheept•1h ago
I feel like this makes sense for a platform that targets teens. Plus, I wouldn't trust TikTok to implement E2E encryption properly—who knows what they've snuck into their client.
somenameforme•1h ago
I think it's very safe to assume that no major US based platform has 'real' E2E encryption. They're almost certainly all a part of PRISM by now, and it'd contradict their obligations to enable government surveillance. So the only thing that's different is not lying about it. Though I expect the other platforms are, like when denying they were part of PRISM, telling half truths and just being intentionally misleading. 'We provide complete E2E encryption [using deterministically generated keys which can be recreated on demand].'
paulryanrogers•1h ago
Signal is open source
ranyume•1h ago
What kind of application is not targeted at both teens and adults?

Youtube, twitter, bluesky, whatsapp? Every app with a social aspect will be used by teens. And no, tiktok is not "only for teens" or "specially targeted at teens", nowadays everyone uses it and creates content on it.

RajT88•35m ago
Came here to post this.

If you run (say) a restaurant, you get big spikes in business from TikTok videos in ways you don't get from Facebook or Instagram or others.

TikTok is the platform everyone is one right now.

ronsor•1h ago
Why would you use TikTok for private communications anyway? It's mostly a public short video sharing platform.
adventured•1h ago
You say that like the typical 18 year old has any idea what they're doing when it comes to proper encryption and communication safety. That is never going to be the case.

It's a communication channel attached to the most popular social network for young people. Obviously they're going to use it a lot. They use it for the extreme convenience.

g947o•1h ago
Says someone who has never sent a message to a friend over DM on TikTok.
halapro•1h ago
It's the kids' social network, you're just old.
asveikau•24m ago
The way it starts is you pass videos back and forth with a friend. Then you find yourself chatting in the same app.

I'm mindful that it's less secure than other apps, but for a lot of chats it doesn't matter.

Bud•1h ago
BBC calling encryption "controversial privacy tech" is deeply disappointing and dangerous.
ggm•1h ago
It is controversial.. amongst people who have concerns about private communications and society, from a regulatory and governance perspective.

It's uncontroversial amongst people who value their privacy.

The tension between the two camps (there are obviously nuances and this is a false dichotomy) is at a current peak. It's an ongoing controversy. It's a matter of public debate.

You might have liked it better if the angle had been "...which the government, controversially, wants to clamp down on" or something.

unethical_ban•52m ago
The UK government seems a lot more willing to embrace the panopticon in the name of protecting people from terrorists, child sex traffickers, human rights activists, Catholics, jaywalkers, you name it.
1shooner•45m ago
I wondered how it could be considered 'controversial', but they do quote at least a couple groups speaking against it. The NSPCC for instance, who incidentally also warned parents about a Harry Potter video game because their children might want to learn more about the game:

>“Parents should also be aware that players may want to find out more about the game using other platforms such as YouTube, Twitch, Reddit and Discord, where other game fans can discuss strategies and experiences.

stinkbeetle•5m ago
Calling something controversial is a favorite propaganda technique employed by "news" outlets. It's another form of selective reporting and framing. It carries negative connotations, and has really no objective standard by which it can be wrong since you'll always find somebody against any issue.

After you notice it, you'll notice it everywhere.

ranyume•55m ago
This might be off-topic but on-topic about child safety... but I'm surprised people are being myopic about age verification. Age verification should be banned, but people ignore that nowadays most widely used online services already ask for your age and act accordingly: twitter, youtube, google in general, any online marketplace. They already got so much data on their users and optimize their algorithms for those groups in an opaque way.

So yeah, age verification should be taken down, as well as the datamining these companies do and the opaque tunning of their algorithms. It baffles me: people are concerned about their children's DMs but are not concerned about what companies serves them and what they do with their data.

LoganDark•32m ago
Monitoring children's DMs is the responsibility of the parents, not megacorps. If a parent wants to install a keylogger or screen recorder on their child's PC, that's their decision. But Google should not be able to. Neither should... literally anyone else except maybe an employer on a work-provided device.
duped•26m ago
Parents shouldn't give their child access to a device that allows DMs.

That said, these platforms are making it impossible for parents to monitor anything. They're literally designed to profit off addiction in children.

greygoo222•19m ago
Why? Plenty of children benefit from talking to other people. Some children need careful monitoring, and some children shouldn't be allowed to use DMs, but it's not universal and should be up to the parents.
ranyume•6m ago
> Monitoring children's DMs is the responsibility of the parents, not megacorps

Absolutely. But what responsibilities do megacorps have? Right now, everyone seems to avoid this question, and make do with megacorps not being responsible. This means: "we'll allow megacorps to be as they are and not take any responsibilities for the effects they have to society". Instead of them taking responsibilities, we're collecting everyone's data, this is because there are many interests involved.

xeckr•50m ago
Brilliant. They're repackaging the argument governments have long made about E2EE being dangerous to children.
debazel•6m ago
Children are just too effect of a tool when building a surveillance state. We should have banned children from owning open computers a long time ago just like we do with Alcohol, Driving licenses, etc.

Instead children would own special devices that are locked down and tagged with a "underage" flag when interacting with online services, while adults could continue as normal. We already heavily restrict the freedom of children so there is plenty of precedent for this. Optionally we could provide service points to unlock devices when they turn 18 to avoid E-waste as well.

This way it's the point of sale where you provide your ID, instead of attaching it to the hardware itself and sending it out to every single SaaS on the planet to do what they wish with.

Tyrubias•49m ago
TikTok’s stance against end-to-end encryption is unsurprising but still concerning. TikTok is a source of information on many topics, such as the genocide in Gaza, which traditional media underreport and many governments try to suppress. The network effect of big social media platforms means many people will likely talk about these topics in TikTok DMs. No matter what legal controls TikTok claims to enforce, there is no substitute for technological barriers for preventing invasions of privacy and government overreach. This is yet another example where corporations and governments sacrifice people’s autonomy and privacy in the name of security.
spaqin•29m ago
It's a pretty terrifying world we live in now, where an unencrypted addictive short-form video platform is considered a source of information more than news agencies or even community-managed forums.
tw04•22m ago
Reminder, Larry “citizens shouldn’t get any privacy” Ellison now owns tik tok. If you’re still using it or have friends and family using it you should stop immediately. It WILL eventually be used against you if this regime gets its way.

https://digitaldemocracynow.org/2025/03/22/the-troubling-imp...

bas•16m ago
Fascinating. What a time to be alive.
burnt-resistor•15m ago
It's the Max app for Americans, now with 900% more US and IL government spying.
rdiddly•13m ago
"The situation is made more complex because TikTok has long faced accusations that ties to the Chinese state may put users' data at risk."

And yet, it's even more complex than that, since it's now owned by cronies of the current US President. I've never had a TikTok account, but conceptually I was mostly pretty okay with being spied-upon by China. I'm never going to China.

andrewinardeer•11m ago
> "I'm never going to China."

Voluntarily.

pothamk•12m ago
The core tension here isn’t really about encryption itself, it’s about moderation models.

Most large platforms rely heavily on server-side visibility for abuse detection, spam filtering, recommendation systems, and safety tooling. End-to-end encryption removes that visibility by design. Once a platform is built around centralized analysis of user content, adding strong E2EE later isn’t just a feature toggle — it conflicts with large parts of the existing architecture.

computerex•12m ago
TikTok is a front for government surveillance, so it's not really surprising that this is their position.
blackqueeriroh•5m ago
There is no way to do E2EE on a traditional social media platform with user-generated content and comply with existing US law.

You can’t moderate an E2EE platform.