> We're collaborating on future devices
Samsung had something as ambitious years ago, but it went nowhere https://www.xda-developers.com/samsung-promised-make-old-pho...
Stay tuned
So likely no existing Motorola phones are good enough and only new ones, developed in collaboration with GrapheneOS developers, will be suitable.
Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
[0] https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/27068-grapheneos-security-p...
From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenovo
Is it possible that it's backdoored, have a secret opcode / management engine? Probably, but that goes to everyone, as it's not practical to analyze what's in the chip (unless you're decapping them and all)
I don't know what secure environments you're talking about, if it's an airgapped system then you should be secure even when what's inside 'tries to get out'.
I've been running on several half-working recent android ports to my Xiaomi Mi 9t for many years now.
If I can get a modern phone, modern android, my privacy preserved and a hackable phone (to the extent an unlockable bootloader allows, which isn't a given nowadays, I especially hate how Xiaomi does it), I'm 100% sold.
We'll see when it comes out I guess!
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47202808
I'm sure that Google will do something like that as soon as it faced the US's carrot and stick they signed-up for.
I WILL be buying their flagship model.
My go to for Graphene has been used Pixels from eBay. Because I can’t give money to Google in good conscience.
jMyles•1h ago
dietr1ch•1h ago
windexh8er•45m ago
And as soon as you start showing these things to people they do start to care and ask how. So the fact that the mainstream is ignorant and doesn't care enough yet doesn't matter because it's very likely a much larger segment of users will care when the tech evangelists they trust stop using IOS and Google Android. That's how these things started and that's how they could very well play out in this scenario as well.
dmix•35m ago