FWIW, the gas tax also only pays a fraction of the actual cost of maintaining roads.
Federal gas tax is generally used for new roads, not road maintenance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_Trust_Fund
If you want an “honest framing”, raise the federal fuel tax to match inflation, then we’ll talk about EVs. Plain and simple, this is just a move to punish EV use.
People have gotten incentives to buy EVs for a very long time now. Isn't it time they pay their fair share? Or do they plan to pay back all the subsidies?
For fairness you also take into account that EVs are more expensive so subsidizing EVs isn't just saving the planet, it's punishing the poor.
Just as soon as fossil fuel companies pay back their subsidies, I’ll have a check ready to send to the U. S . Treasury.
I still find it difficult to believe people bring up EV subsidies with a straight face, like it’s the only thing the government has ever subsidized.
> […] attempts […] to suspend the federal gas tax, without which […] would have halted efforts to repair and expand the Federal highway system.
(emphasis mine)
Did you have a specific quote you intended to point to to support your claim?
But it's annoying to see the US government find a new way to discourage one of the most clear cut ways to reduce fossil fuel usage. If things were fair, we would be taxing gas for its contribution to air pollution and climate change.
We should be doing everything we can to encourage EV adoption, but the current administration is interested in doing the exact opposite. They apparently found a way to do so which gets bipartisan support.
Sure, Detroit which is on life support from making shitty overpriced cars would cease to exist. But EVs would take over the US in just 5 years.
mattbee•1h ago
smt88•1h ago
EVs are also much harsher on roads because of their weight.
cosmic_cheese•59m ago
In fact, within ICE vehicles, the gap between sedans/hatchbacks/compact crossovers and giant SUVs and trucks is larger, and yet for some reason we aren’t taxing drivers of Suburbans and F-150s accordingly.
If we applied this logic fairly we should be pushing people to right-size their vehicles regardless of fuel type.
jonfw•46m ago
eli•45m ago
manwe150•56m ago
marcosdumay•13m ago
mikestew•41m ago
I’d have to drive an EV about 35% more miles each year to make it to break even on tax versus our 35 mpg ICE car. It’s no bargain, it’s punishment for driving an EV.
EVs are also much harsher on roads because of their weight.
My Hyundai Ioniq 5 weighs less than the most popular vehicle in the US: the F-150. I don’t see those getting special taxes.
wil421•31m ago
How do you pay more taxes on EVs when you factor in gas taxes?
mikestew•27m ago
Huh? Simple math?
$MILES_PER_YEAR/$200 (EV tax in WA) vs. $GALLONS_USED * $0.18 in the ICE car. I pay more in taxes to run the EV in a year than I do for equivalent miles in a 35mpg ICE. IOW, if I drove the Scion xB all the time, I’d pay less tax.
jquery•5m ago
csomar•44m ago
embedding-shape•37m ago
dd8601fn•31m ago
pirates•28m ago
embedding-shape•25m ago
So then tax based on weight if that's the differentiator of the damage done? I guess in combination with mileage would make most sense, and add in a scale based on net worth too to make it extra goodie.
brendoelfrendo•20m ago
Where this new fee has issues is that it would charge EV owners roughly double the average amount paid by ICE owners in federal fuel tax, and wouldn't consider how much driving a given EV is actually doing.
abdullahkhalids•10m ago
[1] Commercial vehicle weight is strongly determined by the cargo load.
marcosdumay•15m ago
Electricity doesn't, and it's not very fair to just add those taxes.
xdennis•30m ago
missedthecue•21m ago
nephihaha•16m ago