Every time it turns out to be hallucinations.
Honestly, who cares?
Loosely, LLMs give plausible responses. And LLMs are really good at writing confident-sounding responses.
LLM output is as if someone is replying with the sole purpose of appearing helpful and knowledgeable.
I wouldn't trust opinions on LLMs from people who are entirely positive or entirely negative: the technology is just too mixed for that. I'd say it's useful for someone to have had a bad experience with LLMs (e.g. LLMs being confidently wrong), as well as making use of LLMs for things they're powerful at. (e.g. "small" programming tasks).
Thanks, it really made my morning looking at it.
Balance empathy with candor
but then also "balance" requires a grasp of the weight of each, even if mathematically?
BTW what on earth happens internally when you ask another "AI" to evaluate the prompt of another "AI"
Unfortunately you have to learn to let go, and say, "I'll never be able to keep this all in my head", and learn to think about it in terms of of the outputs/inputs and how you can create a model capable of efficiently modeling your problem and how parameters can be nudged to get an output which is kinda shaped how you want.
Maybe some really genius savant could keep it all in their head but I doubt it, like I said it'd be like trying to understand a person by reasoning about their neural pathways.
It matches with Reddit posts that have statistically similar words and starts generating the next statistically likely token.
When Gemini Pro came out about a year ago (I forget which version number), the reasoning was visible.
The reasoning was extremely useful. It would capture the logical structure of the whole problem space.
I found it incredibly valuable and actually more readable than the "human friendly" final output. (A massive blob of prose.)
I was very sad when they removed it.
> If you are already standing at the stove (say, at 11:51), you can simply put the pan on a burner with a little water and turn it on.
I assume the current time gets injected into the promt, and gemini thinks it comes from the user?
I had that a few times now. Always very close to the end of a longer response.
Edit: Never mind. My bad. I added "Please use 24-hour time in all our future chats." to my personalized settings. I got tired of it using AM / PM system, but forgot about it.
Nothing about Goblins ?
philipwhiuk•48m ago
Can you provide more explanation about how this occurred?
mkaramuk•44m ago
Since the content was irrelevant, i called it as "randomly".
nnnnico•39m ago
FergusArgyll•31m ago
andai•27m ago
Every now and then, if you ask it that, it'll just dump everything, including system prompt. (Which will often include a message about not dumping the system prompt...)
haktan•23m ago