When opening the posted link, my first thought was "imagine if the stacked PRs site had the same amount of effort put into it as the Github Copilot App site". They clearly have other preview features on this site already, so maybe I'm just confused on why stacked PRs got some b-grade announcement site. The obvious answer is "copilot", but I'm still curious.
Target market for copilot includes people with actual purchasing power and also many new users where this is an actual make or break feature. So this is worth the investment into design while stacked PRs is questionable. I actually question why they bothered with anything more than a blog post at all for stacked PRs (looking at the post it doesn't seem like too too much more than a blog post though).
These desktop agentic coding tools are a large UX step up from the CLIs, but I still think the future is going to be remote development as the coding agents start running for hours at a time. Building a desktop app seems short-sighted as it would just lock them out of the remote option completely.
There's support in VS Code and Jetbrains IDEs. You can access your agent sessions on the web.
(I work at GitHub, but not on Copilot)
[1]: https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-...
Edit: This short talk – https://maggieappleton.com/zero-alignment
Other than fewer features.
roetlich•51m ago
kirtivr•9m ago
A worktree is basically equivalent to a cp -R + git branch, which allows this new workflow to occur.
I loved this particular historical insight as to why git worktree was added in 2015 -
Before worktrees, kernel developers faced a major inconvenience when switching contexts (e.g., stopping feature work to fix an urgent bug on a release branch).
Running git stash and switching branches alters timestamps on thousands of files. This forces the build system (make) to perform a full re-compile, which can take up to an hour on large kernels.