frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Why Janet? (2023)

https://ianthehenry.com/posts/why-janet/
161•yacin•2h ago•63 comments

Adafruit Receives Demand Letter from Fenwick Legal Counsel on Behalf of Flux.ai

https://blog.adafruit.com/
112•semanser•1h ago•40 comments

CSS-Native Parallax Effect

https://dan-webnotes.com/posts/2026-06-02-css-native-parallax-effect/
33•dandep•1h ago•16 comments

The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I've seen

https://www.0xsid.com/blog/meta-account-takeover-fiasco
1885•ssiddharth•19h ago•427 comments

Can the stockmarket swallow Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI?

https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2026/06/01/can-the-stockmarket-swallow-anthropic-...
419•1vuio0pswjnm7•12h ago•733 comments

Muxcard, a dyi credit card size computer

https://github.com/krauseler/muxcard
85•sargstuff•2d ago•21 comments

macOS needs its grid back

https://blog.hopefullyuseful.com/blog/macos-needs-its-grid-back/
284•ranebo•10h ago•163 comments

CQL: Categorical Databases

https://categoricaldata.net/
50•noworriesnate•3d ago•13 comments

Webcam head tracking, webcam to control in‑game FOV

https://www.openfov.com/
8•mwit2023•2d ago•3 comments

Chipotlai Max

https://github.com/cyberpapiii/chipotlai-max
256•nigelgutzmann•12h ago•39 comments

OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS

https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/
290•typpo•14h ago•101 comments

How is Groq raising more money?

https://www.zach.be/p/how-the-hell-is-groq-raising-more
119•hasheddan•10h ago•52 comments

Debug Project

https://debug.com/
234•Eridanus2•15h ago•94 comments

AI Agent Guidelines for CS336 at Stanford

https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
434•prakashqwerty•19h ago•140 comments

CS336: Language Modeling from Scratch

https://cs336.stanford.edu/
490•kristianpaul•21h ago•48 comments

Should you normalize RGB values by 255 or 256?

https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/
279•pplanu•18h ago•118 comments

Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/01/microsoft-builds-its-ultimate-macbook-pro-rival-with-the...
231•jbk•23h ago•481 comments

Fooling around with encrypted reasoning blobs

https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/05/29/fooling-around-with-encrypted-reasoning-blobs/
102•supermatou•4d ago•17 comments

Strace-ui, Bonsai_term, and the TUI renaissance

https://blog.janestreet.com/strace-ui-bonsai-term-and-the-tui-renaissance/
65•matt_d•7h ago•42 comments

Launch HN: Expanse (YC P26) – Unlock Wasted GPU Capacity

85•ismaeel_bashir•22h ago•25 comments

What appear to be biochemical processes may be a natural feature of geology

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-dirt-that-refused-to-die-20260601/
246•speckx•20h ago•89 comments

On Reading SRAMs in IR Images, and Establishing Bounds on Trust

https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/2026/on-reading-srams-in-ir-images-and-establishing-bounds-on-...
6•zdw•1d ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2026)

200•whoishiring•20h ago•281 comments

Michael Burry says neither SpaceX nor Anthropic is worth $1T

https://www.businessinsider.com/big-short-michael-burry-spacex-anthropic-ipo-ai-bubble-claude-2026-6
55•mgh2•1h ago•59 comments

Alphabet announces $80B equity capital raise to expand AI infra and compute

https://abc.xyz/investor/news/news-details/2026/Alphabet-Announces-Proposed-80-Billion-Equity-Cap...
210•gregschlom•15h ago•192 comments

I made my phone slow on purpose

https://vinewallapp.com/notes/i-made-my-phone-slow-on-purpose/
214•gcampos•4d ago•178 comments

A new way to build chips: Sequentially stacking silicon to extend Moore's Law

https://matse.illinois.edu/news/85775
56•hhs•2d ago•34 comments

Crystal Nights (2008)

https://www.gregegan.net/MISC/CRYSTAL/Crystal.html
49•rorylawless•10h ago•6 comments

America's Corporate Protector

https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2026-trump-cfpb-enforcement
11•petethomas•1h ago•1 comments

Florida sues OpenAI and Sam Altman over AI risks

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/01/openai-hit-with-florida-lawsuit-00944215
242•cyunker•19h ago•181 comments
Open in hackernews

Adafruit Receives Demand Letter from Fenwick Legal Counsel on Behalf of Flux.ai

https://blog.adafruit.com/
107•semanser•1h ago

Comments

kasabali•1h ago
What's the context here?
Neil44•1h ago
It seems there's suspiciously little context available, yet here I also am commenting on a 'vaguepost'. I wonder if one day AI will be able to filter out vagueposts from my browser along with ragebait and curiosity gap headlines.
abirch•46m ago
If AI does that it’ll make us 10x readers
alexfoo•21m ago
Indeed, however:

    10 x 0.1 = 1
throw_a_grenade•38m ago
It's deliberately written that way, by lawyers who are making sure they (Adafruit) won't accidentaly admit to something they didn't.
Neywiny•1h ago
Best I can tell they've taken down whatever it was, but most likely flux left some ways to get data out of their system that shouldn't have been and Adafruit leveraged that. Could have been in a good way like exposing false claims of architecture or security, or a bad way like revealing proprietary information on how the platform worked or looking at other peoples' projects (more than just seeing they could do that). If the blog doesn't come back up, I'll kinda assume they did something bad. I don't have sources but I've heard adafruit isn't the sweetest fruit in the tree...
throwa356262•1h ago
Had no idea about this. Now I do.

Thank you, lawyers. If you ever find yourself out of work use this as your reference to pivot to advertisement

jamesbfb•1h ago
Streisand in full effect!
bayindirh•43m ago
It's super effective!
antirez•1h ago
Note that this is not related to Black Forest Labs Flux, the image synthesis models builders, and is instead related to a PCB AI authoring product called Flux.ai.
justinclift•1h ago
Thanks, that name was indeed making me wonder what's going on with the BFL people. :)
suncemoje•1h ago
Exactly, these vectors point in very different directions!
Trung0246•31m ago
Also not related to https://fluxkeyboard.com/
villgax•24m ago
> Time to shine

Nor is this Flux the display warmth app

luma•1h ago
Flux.ai offers a PCB design solution which is a clear interest for Adafruit. Anyone have any idea what this is about?
tecleandor•48m ago
Flux just got funding from Bain and others, and it feels like Adafruit was preparing a post about it. Maybe they contacted Flux to confirm some info and they freaked out?

I can't find in archive.org if they had a previous post about it.

Also, seems like there a good bunch of complains in Reddit about Flux and its billing...

https://old.reddit.com/r/PCB/comments/1t476x4/warning_fluxai...

8cvor6j844qw_d6•47m ago
https://archive.ph/g5JHr

As of 2026-06-02T11:09:16+0000

karmicthreat•36m ago
Adafruit probably did a review of AI PCB tools. I've used Flux.ai before; it was a pretty bad experience. After about 50-100$ in tokens a couple of times, I couldn't get more than a couple of simple components on the schematic. And not in sensible positions.

The product just grinds tokens for little return, in my opinion. I had far better luck wiring together KiCad MCP, SKIDL. There are some AI-driven autorouters out there now. Placement is probably the big issue that needs to be solved now. I could only get about 80% of what I wanted together with my hacky workflow.

embedding-shape•31m ago
> After about 50-100$ in tokens a couple of times, I couldn't get more than a couple of simple components on the schematic.

Is this common? When I try out new AI tools, even as person who is financially independent, I load up maybe 10-20 USD worth of tokens, and if I don't get anything working from that, I literally give up and don't continue trying. If it can't do anything useful like "place a simple component on the schematic" after ~10 USD of expenditure, is it really worth continue adding more money into the platform? Seems DOA in those cases.

karmicthreat•22m ago
I used company money on it. I was hoping I could massage it along enough to get a workable test fixture out of it. I wanted to put together a simple hardware-in-the-loop tester for a component of our product.
StephenSmith•28m ago
I tried this last week and had the same experience. It was terrible and they got $140 out of me before I realized what it was (not) capable of. Their support was nonexistent as well.
mapontosevenths
inshane•32m ago
As an electrical engineer who has tried to use it multiple times, I think Flux is an absolutely awful product. No surprise at all that they want to sweep details about their “intellectual property, commercial traction and user base” under the rug.
yodon•27m ago
> Adafruit’s reporting concerns a matter of public security interest and was conducted in the ordinary course of responsible disclosure
wewewedxfgdf•26m ago
Suing the industry won't win them customers/friends.
bob001•18m ago
I suspect they don't care. Their only goal is likely to get enough good PR to sell to some big tech or AI company for an absurd valuation.
TZubiri•24m ago
>The letter further asserts claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Adafruit accessed only information that Flux’s own systems made publicly available through a server misconfiguration

A confession

Ekaros•18m ago
They vibe coded their system and it showed Adafruit something? Or showed some information with trivial prodding? Sounds like your average cross-tenant leak. Maybe showing more than intended or some caching issue. Many options some not really not fault of Adafruit.
raphman•23m ago
Never heard of Flux.ai before. It seems to be a 3D circuit designer with 'AI'.

Not sure what the issue between them and Adafruit is. However, people over on Reddit¹ claim that Flux.ai is a little bit scummy. They push users into a beginner trial ($5/month) and then silently charge for usage per token - up to $100 per month.

Oh, they also claim that they have "the world's largest community-driven public library of Adafruit products, including footprints, symbols, datasheets, and simulation models"². I wonder whether they designed these themselves or whether they use existing ones. Could not easily find licenses info.

¹) https://www.reddit.com/r/PCB/comments/18o5zfo/thoughts_on_fl...

²) https://www.flux.ai/sitemap/manufacturers/adafruit

0x59•22m ago
From what I can tell, the message is

When you discover an exploit, only communicate with source (and pray they respond) or get sued. Seems like the position is customers and stakeholders shouldn't be allowed access to this information.

sigmoid10•20m ago
That's actually very common even with respected bug bounty programs. Communicating exploits to anyone else (let alone the general public) will at the very least make you ineligible for rewards.
ptorrone•21m ago
hi everyone, phil and limor here, any questions for now, email press@adafruit.com

limor and i are very much looking forward to telling our story.

zettabomb•17m ago
I'm curious, but I'm not sure if you can say - has Adafruit ever published anything about Flux?
jdnrebd•13m ago
You should read the linked article
boncester•10m ago
It might be being suggested in that statement, but to me that reads that there's a potential opportunity there for a delayed AMA on this?

That if people were to email press@adafruit.com with a subject line (for example) of 'FLUX - AMA for later', these questions could be rounded up and the responses could then go onto a Adafruit blog page later, when and if applicable?

altaccount2026•10m ago
A few questions:

Lots of questions come to mind:

Is Philip still at Adafruit? Does he represent Adafruit?

Why did you take the Adafruit blog down when there appeared to be no Flux.ai-related posts?

Open companies like SparkFun publish the legal letters they receive, will you do the same? If not, why not?

Why did @ptorrone recently delete all his x.com post history?

reactordev•15m ago
Struck a nerve, but I wouldn’t back down. If they do take you to court, there’s this wonderful thing called discovery.
Falimonda•13m ago
Had anyone tried AutoPCB (https://autopcb.app/) instead?

Seems especially useful when paired with an agentic coding tool!

•
6m ago
> I could only get about 80% of what I wanted together with my hacky workflow.

I literally did this yesterday with solid results using Codex CLI. I used xhigh thinking and gpt 5.5.

I had it use KiCad directly via cli rather than via MCP, and I did make Claude Opus review it's work after every round. I got what I think will be a working revision A in about 10 hours of tinkering spread over a few days.