Seems like a perfectly reasonable stance.
Larger point: I am so sick of HN comment sections filling up with obligatory comments speculating about whether a post is AI-written.
At this point I don’t care. People now write with AI. If the writing is deficient in some way, then comment on that. At least that way the “writer” can steer the writing towards greater coherence.
`Obvious in hindsight.`
`The clock never jumps.`
`No lookahead, no undo.`
`A real kick pattern is not a clock.`
>Larger point: I am so sick of HN comment sections filling up with obligatory comments speculating about whether a post is AI-written.
Gotta disagree wholeheartedly with that - using AI to write for you is really fucking annoying as a reader. It screams to me that the "author" feels the reader's time is worthless, and it homogenizes language in a way that is troubling to say the least.
I'm so tired
sashyo•3d ago
Happy to answer anything about the tracker internals - onset weighting, downbeat inference from accent patterns, or why the band schedules against the clock's forecast instead of reacting to hits (keeps audio latency out of the drummer's timing loop entirely).
Slow_Hand•44m ago