The current US administration is known to be collection of BS artists and liars.
It would have been a tiny part of the overall training, given the timeline
The Chinese are not gonna deterred, but the posturing by the Americans is so blatantly hypocritical that everybody is cheering for their demise. See, for example, one of Francis Fukuyama's latests videos on youtube.
How did Moonshot "distil" a huge model in such short time and still had time to run the benchmarks and do the usual release thingies?
I think Anthropic is desperate to stop foreign competition and the administration is happy to help because they too are heavily invested in these companies
We should do more distillation and figure out how to create faster leaner and better models.
Obviously, it's not K3 level. But Fable did just put itself out of a job in this case.
[Fable fires up a ton of subagents. Their reasoning traces are horrific but somehow K3 learned something.]
See also, don't trust anyone in Trump's government who says "we have information".
"they distilled us" is fast becoming standard US FUD.
The same as people telling me with a serious face that the Chinese models are distilled just because it says "I am Claude".
I am not the only one, look at this post on interconnects about Kimi K3 for example:[1]
It should be clear looking at this model that if adversarial distillation from the closed frontier models in the U.S. contributed, it is at most to a relatively small degree. AI observers who followed the distillation panic and came away with the wrong conclusion that Chinese AI labs are only producing good models due to IP theft are in for an awakening – that Chinese companies are extremely good at building models in the same way the leading American companies are.
[1] https://www.interconnects.ai/p/kimi-k3-the-open-weights-esca...That said, I doubt the "they distilled Fable" is the reason why K3 is as good as it is, considering the timelines involved, and that Anthropic hides thinking traces, and their overly aggressive "safety" filters.
This constant FUD spread by Anthropic is so tiring.
Side note, didn't they stop releasing real thinking tokens for Fable? Or is it still part of some subs or API usage?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1tqaist/opus_48...
(don't take this too seriously)
Of course many related issues (that this was stolen to begin with, open weight vs closed, etc).
cf https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1uyj6pq/kimi_k3_is_1...
> Aren't consumers benefiting from this practice by getting better cheaper models as a result?
Aren't consumers benefiting from cheap chinese batteries, EVs, and drones?
- US AI companies
They definitely used closed private saas products to train their own models, to prove that just drop random small screenshots of any popular product behind a login screen and see how well it's able to identify all of them. ex: https://x.com/michalwols/status/2079968211865330165
You are a fantastic moderator, but there’s only so much even you can do. If nothing changes about the website, the problem will only get worse. I warned years ago that this would happen, the signs were on the wall immediately.
treetalker•2h ago
dang•44m ago
"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes." - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I don't mean to pick on you personally! It's just that reflexive responses always tend to show up first in a thread, when what we really want are reflective responses [1]. Similarly, there's a strong tendency for threads to turn into generic discussions, whereas what we really want are specific ones [2].
[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Bratmon•36m ago
No more, no less.
cmdocidjcije•34m ago
cassianoleal•33m ago
phikappa•33m ago
ceejayoz•32m ago
To be fair, that's also the case for the link itself we're discussing.
supriyo-biswas•31m ago
unethical_ban•30m ago
Given the complete disregard for intellectual property rights the AI labs had in creating the technology in the first place, many people feel little or no sympathy for second-order AI labs using similar techniques to build technology off the US frontier labs.
I think fighting distillation will always be cat-and-mouse, and that it's more of a concern for the stockholders and perhaps an iota of national security.
It can't be stopped entirely, and the "problem" will always be there. I'm much more concerned about asymmetry of power between citizens and their governments with omnipresent surveillance and analysis being done on everyone living their lives.
Societies throughout history have taken as a given their power to overthrow malicious governments when things hit a breaking point, and I am scared that this technology will lock societies into a permanent state of subordination for eternity.