> Beginning January 2026, all ACM publications and related artifacts in the ACM Digital Library will be made open access.
ilaksh•41m ago
The real efficacy of the peer review system has always been somewhat questionable. That's a big reason why arxiv is so prominent.
juancn•39m ago
They probably already scraped it.
ilaksh•34m ago
I don't want to be mean but if it's that hard to even recognize that LLMs are even a valid thing that could intersect with your business that you need some kind of campaign for it..
It's almost like, "don't hurt yourself unc, we will just search arxiv".
skippyfish•33m ago
ACM has been leaning heavily into AI-generated content for their journals in the past year, and this article is no exception: it appears to be 100% AI generated and full of LLM verbiage.
There's something hilarious about that, but also, snake eating its own tail.
skywhopper•29m ago
TLDR: “we’re going to try to get money from LLM providers for access to our back catalog without getting permission from the authors or providing them with any share of the revenue”.
anticensor•24m ago
Scholarly article authors never expected royalty or permission for their scholarly works to be reused.
recursivedoubts•50m ago
now it will be fodder for the slop machine
(i think that LLMs are going to wreck the peer review system for all but hard-experimental papers)
jmount•48m ago
cobbal•22m ago
> Beginning January 2026, all ACM publications and related artifacts in the ACM Digital Library will be made open access.
ilaksh•41m ago