frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

You Could Have Come Up with Kimi Delta Attention

https://blog.doubleword.ai/you-could-have-come-up-with-kimi-delta-attention
177•AnhTho_FR•2h ago•57 comments

Steel Bank Common Lisp version 2.6.7

https://sbcl.org/all-news.html?2.6.7
37•tmtvl•1h ago•3 comments

Delayed Gratification – Proud to Be 'Last to Breaking News'

https://www.slow-journalism.com/
95•speerer•2h ago•43 comments

Zig's Incremental Compilation Internals

https://mlugg.co.uk/posts/incremental-compilation-internals/
91•garyhtou•2h ago•38 comments

7.1 Earthquake in Japan

https://www.data.jma.go.jp/multi/quake/quake_detail.html?eventID=20260728163528&lang=en
720•krembo•10h ago•183 comments

How Do I Profile eBPF Code?

https://naveensrinivasan.com/posts/2026-07-22-how-do-i-profile-ebpf-code/
66•snaveen•2h ago•5 comments

Discovering Cryptographic Weaknesses with Claude

https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-cryptographic-weaknesses
46•gslin•50m ago•10 comments

Kimi K3 Architecture Overview and Notes

https://sebastianraschka.com/blog/2026/kimi-k3-architecture-notes.html
84•ModelForge•2h ago•8 comments

Show HN: XY – A Fast, composable, GPU-accelerated interactive plotting library

https://github.com/reflex-dev/xy
51•apetuskey•2h ago•19 comments

Substack writers, you need a website

https://elizabethtai.com/2026/06/10/substack-writers-you-need-a-website/
69•speckx•1h ago•58 comments

iPhone Upgrade Program

https://www.apple.com/shop/iphone/iphone-upgrade-program
19•lkurtz•35m ago•13 comments

New HIV vaccine shows unprecedented success in preclinical study

https://www.lji.org/news-events/news/post/new-hiv-vaccine-shows-unprecedented-success-in-preclini...
380•codebyaditya•5h ago•181 comments

Harmony Explained: Progress Towards a Scientific Theory of Music (2012)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4212
57•surprisetalk•2h ago•43 comments

WOFF 1.0: a milestone on W3C's journey of fonts on the web

https://www.w3.org/blog/2026/woff-1-0-a-milestone-on-w3cs-journey-of-fonts-on-the-web/
16•hn_acker•1h ago•0 comments

Kimi Linear: An Expressive, Efficient Attention Architecture

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26692
213•ronfriedhaber•7h ago•81 comments

Now Is the Time to Give LLMs Access to the ACM Digital Library

https://cacm.acm.org/opinion/now-is-the-time-to-give-llms-access-to-the-acm-digital-library/
37•rbanffy•3h ago•15 comments

Anthropeum

https://anthropeum.com/
62•bookofjoe•3h ago•13 comments

So, you want to make a game engine (2023)

https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/so-you-want-to-make-a-game-engine.html#part-3
27•kugurerdem•2h ago•22 comments

Using a Gaming PC's RTX 5070 from a separate Linux workstation

https://stephenkrings.com/posts/rtx-5070-linux-gpu-server/
8•microbial•5d ago•0 comments

DMARC Has Been Public Since 2012. 68.4% of Domains Still Don't Enforce It

https://ciphercue.com/blog/dmarc-enforcement-gap-rua-fragmentation-2026
128•adulion•7h ago•85 comments

How to Survive Boiling Water

https://taxa.substack.com/p/how-to-survive-boiling-water
341•cainxinth•4d ago•72 comments

Una Watch: Garmin watch competitor but repairable, open ecosystem and USB-C

https://unawatch.com/
35•pimterry•3h ago•22 comments

Stop Killing the Internet: No Digital ID and No Age Verification

https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/2026/000011_en
157•doener•3h ago•55 comments

Show HN: Formally verified 3D CSG: Trust 93 lines spec, not 1000 lines AI code

https://github.com/schildep/verified-3d-mesh-intersection
90•permute•5h ago•40 comments

Xenharmlib (music theory library) adds support for Just Intonation

https://xenharmlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/whats_new_0_4_0.html
9•retooth•2h ago•1 comments

VMs can't boot with Network Mode set to Bridged on Apple M5 Pro machines

https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/issues/7658
45•IndySun•4h ago•24 comments

Show HN: Flashpaper – Self-destructing secret sharing with no database

https://flashpaper.app/
17•minpym•2h ago•2 comments

Google's Beyond Zero: Enterprise Security for the AI Era

https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3819083
113•jordigg•8h ago•63 comments

Solving Fermat: Andrew Wiles

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/wiles.html
53•1970-01-01•21h ago•22 comments

Scientific computing in the age of agentic AI

https://openai.com/index/scientific-computing-agentic-ai/
13•mfiguiere•59m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Substack writers, you need a website

https://elizabethtai.com/2026/06/10/substack-writers-you-need-a-website/
69•speckx•1h ago

Comments

josefritzishere•50m ago
TLDR: POSSE: Publish (on your) Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere.
pavlov•47m ago
Is there a guide for how to do the “syndicate elsewhere” part?

For the HN audience, the first part is trivially easy (getting a domain, publishing on it) but the second probably isn’t obvious.

cosmicgadget•39m ago
There are guides but it amounts to "use popular services to link to your website". Post snippets on the bird apps, social media hellscapes, and aggregators like this one. Duplicate your content on the blogging services. Have an RSS feed and submit it to discovery engines and web directories/rings. And send me a link so I can index you.

Stickers are neat too.

dghlsakjg•38m ago
Depending on how often you write copy and paste to “elsewhere” is the easy answer.

Substack really wants you to use them as a primary publisher so they don’t make it easy to programmatically put content up. Other platforms have varying levels of ease around this.

mertbio•46m ago
I recently started to write newsletters about Hamburg (https://alsterrunde.com). Before doing that I also considered Substack but seeing that I have to pay 50$ for just using my domain was a no-go. In the end, I ended up with my friend's hosted Ghost solution (https://www.synapsmedia.com).

If you already have a Substack, you can also easily migrate to Ghost. Since it is open source, you can also host it on Hetzner, if you want to manage it yourself.

dynm•44m ago
For what it's worth, I have a markdown-based website with a domain I own, and I stubbornly link to that website only, treating substack as just a temporary distribution channel.[^1] And I am constantly, endlessly asking myself if all the extra friction I've added to my life is worth it.

[^1]: I can't stand how slow and tracking-heavy substack is, but the problem of "send email and not get filtered as spam" is non-trivial.

skippyfish•43m ago
Counterpoint from someone who's been publishing on the internet for decades: no one will visit your website. It's as simple as that. You need a push mechanism to reach readers.

RSS could be it, but it's too niche. Social media is kinda it, but algorithmic feeds reward political clickbait and just because someone clicks "follow" or "subscribe" is not a guarantee that they will ever see your posts. Substack gives you a way to push content to your subscribers without an intermediary deciding what they get to read.

So no, there's no special value to having a website or syndicating across the web. There's a lot of value in backing up your Substack subscribers' emails so that you can move somewhere else down the line, and the nice thing about Substack is that they let you do that. If they stop, that's a trap.

Topology1•39m ago
I feel like the transition from substack to website + newsletter wouldn't be terrible, although I'm sure your traffic would decrease after making the switch.
cosmicgadget•24m ago
I miss the days when I'd regularly get forwards from friends about stuff they found on the internet.
rusk•38m ago
I actively skip stuff that’s on substack just like I do medium and blogger. Maybe there’s good stuff on there but it’s usually a by-word for slop. I figure if anyone has anything that interesting to say they’d make the effort and put it up on something more serious looking.
dpkirchner•31m ago
acmnrs•39m ago
Alternatively, use an open platform that doesn't lock you in:

  * Leaflet<https://leaflet.pub>
  * Offprint<https://offprint.app>
  * Pckt<https://pckt.blog>
spelk•35m ago
I think from a technical perspective, newsletters are a solved problems with lots of options as you've mentioned.

Substack thrives because it's built a reputation for having well-reasoned or engaging voices in a newsletter format. They pushed a big campaign to onboard writers like Bill Bishop (Sinocism) onto the platform early on. Because of that, newer writers are likely seeking to tap into the network effects/discovery systems that comes with having big names on the platform.

wuliwong•32m ago
I get that we all want people to be on open platforms but I feel like the really staunch part of the open platforms only crowd is not taking the time to understand why people like platforms like substack.
spelk•39m ago
I am quite sad that Kagi Smallweb excludes Substack. I understand that less technical writers have started moving to Substack both to build an audience and have access to effective publishing tools, but it feels like I'm missing out on some really interesting new perspectives, similar to early Medium.
doublepg23•38m ago
I've always understood platforms like Substack or Patreon to really be a solution to the payment processing problem first and foremost.
t-writescode•34m ago
That’s exactly right. Finding ways to get paid for your work, and all the very complicated way taxes interact with it all, unless you’re going all-in on ads, is a messy problem that people will happily centralize for.

And for the less technical people, we have 30+ years of solving this problem with different websites that each went in and out of vogue, from groceries and MySpace, through Facebook and now Medium and Substack.

doublepg23•21m ago
I follow a very prolific open-source/FOSS podcasting network.

All of their infrastructure from the very bottom to the very top is FOSS - except their membership program. It links to a third-party which processes payments compliantly.

They've attempted a pivot to funding the network via BTC/Lightning but clearly that's polarizing to a lot of people even though it better aligns with their philosophy.

raincole•37m ago
Did we really learn nothing from Medium's situation?
wuliwong•32m ago
What did you learn from the Medium situation?
elgolem89•35m ago
who reads websites these days?
slater•29m ago
You? For example, on this site?
f311a•33m ago
Substack gives a really nice exposure though, unlike medium and other platforms.

It's very hard to gain readers now on independent websites. Google search is dead (very few people now search for tech content), social media platforms penalize you for posting links and so on.

You can get a few thousand subscribers on Substack just by being consistent and interacting with other people. Now try gaining 1000 subscribers to an e-mail newsletter or RSS from your personal blog. People who tried it know that 5,000 views on your blog can convert to a few subscribers, and you need to get those 5000 somehow first.

A lot of people just repost their articles to substack for a reason. It's not forbidden. You can repost them from your personal blog.

rsingel•30m ago
Not true. Ghost sites grow quite well and much of Substack's network effects don't turn into real subscribers
simonw•26m ago
I'm pretty happy with the way I've resolved this. I publish everything to my personal blog first, then once a week I copy and paste it all into a Substack newsletter.

I get to use Substack for email distribution (which would cost me hundreds of dollars a month using most other solutions, I have 66,000 subscribers now) but my own blog stays the original point of truth.

Here's the tool I use for the copy-pasting: https://tools.simonwillison.net/blog-to-newsletter

Substack doesn't have an API for composing a newsletter, but their rich text editor DOES accept copy-pasted data - and copy-paste is the universal API.

rsingel•22m ago
You could do the same thing through Ghost, which has an API, and not be using a service that proudly platforms the Tates and nazis.
simonw•3m ago
Ghost would cost $288/month (or $241/month paid yearly).
cosmicgadget•14m ago
It's sort of disgusting that inbox clutter from a publishing service is the dominant delivery paradigm as opposed to browsers natively checking bookmarked RSS feeds.
drdexebtjl•2m ago
At 66,000 messages/week, you’d actually be spending around $50-$80 monthly with SES and a VPS + database for handling bounces and unsubscribe requests.
thataccount•26m ago
As a writer who has been on the web for a long time, I no longer write much for the sake of the web. My personal website I took down this year because I didn't like the idea of AI snarfing up everything I wrote. I hate sites like Substack because they are a single point of failure that rely on partners like Stripe for any kind of financial linkage. While I don't write only for money, I certainly write with the idea of needing a certain amount of money to keep on writing. The internet just doesn't offer that kind of environment anymore in my opinion.

I do like the Indie web, and to me, it is more just the way the internet was/has been/needs to be. What is missing are neutral kinds of payment layers/vendors that won't pull your funding if you say something someone somewhere doesn't like.

01284a7e•21m ago
Same - I wrote on the web for 25 years (2000 to 2025). I can attribute hundreds of thousands of dollars of income to it. I no longer have any websites, as nothing came out of it for a couple years. ~90% of all my traffic ended up bots.

And if you put up a website now (without existing backlinks, etc.) bots will be >99% of your traffic.

firasd•25m ago
I think just the $5/mo or so for hosting a WordPress blog and then the $20/yr for a domain name is prohibitive for many people—-not necessarily financially but like ‘oh great now I gotta deal with this’. So that’s why Medium in the past and now Substack etc end up as fallbacks
pitchlatte•12m ago
given that wordpress.com is just managed hosting i wonder if other providers can bring that cost down. installing it yourself is trivial though because of Softaculous, and web hosting is much cheaper.
carlosjobim•2m ago
Yes, that's what it is. Even worse if you want to get paid through subscriptions. Although Ghost blog might be a good middle option.
millipede•24m ago
Whenever I see Substack or Medium URLs, I avoid clicking them. They are so spammy with their call to subscribe, that it's not even worth me visiting them. People recognize quality, and they don't need to be pressured to subscribe. The websites I visit every day never asked me to come back.
CM30•23m ago
Yeah, even if the website itself gets less traffic than the places you syndicate the content to, it's at least a stable home base that's there if those platforms fall apart. Are you posting something that corporations or celebrities don't like/want to see shared? Then posting it on your own site means that the buck stops with you, and they'll have to force you to take it down in court rather than relying on advertiser pressure/'encouraging' the platform to ignore fair use. Did you do something controversial that means platforms don't want to deal with you or individuals want to ruin your life? Having your own site means you can generally tell them to pound sand. And there's no worries regarding things like forced logins, forced ads, obnoxious cookie banners (especially if you don't need to collect personal info anyway), age verification restrictions, etc.

Plus there's just a level of control over the design and features that you can't get elsewhere. Want to make the site look completely unlike any other? It's 100% doable, as plenty of blogs posted here show very well. Want to add a new feature like polls or surveys or quizzes or interactive infographics or what not? You don't need a third party service or some premium account, you just add it yourself.

Running a website is like owning a home rather than renting one. You decide what furniture, what colours, what utilities and service providers, whether you want pets, etc.

cosmicgadget•9m ago
And HN is kind of like the HOA of websites, giving you notices about color choice, pets, and under construction gifs.
8organicbits•19m ago
The linked article "What I learned from one year of Substack" [1] perfectly sums up my experience. I can't read the article because I only see a coercive demand to subscribe first. Perhaps that's the joke.

[1] https://elizabethtai.com/2023/10/22/what-i-learned-from-one-...

Me, too, but mainly because they pushed Nazi content to their users and rather than simply stop hosting that content they continue, proudly.
zahlman•18m ago
They have done nothing of the sort.
wizzwizz4•12m ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20251221230655/https://www.userm...

> Substack sent a push alert encouraging users to subscribe to a Nazi newsletter that claimed Jewish people are a sickness and that we must eradicate minorities to build a “White homeland.” […] The newsletter's logo is a swastika and it has pushed Holocaust denialism along with news and opinion content for the 'White Nationalist Community.' […] Substack is primarily funded by Andreessen Horowitz, a firm whose founders have pushed extreme far right rhetoric.

billyp-rva•36m ago
> Substack gives you a way to push content to your subscribers without an intermediary deciding what they get to read.

How do we know they won't start limiting your reach in the future? That's the path basically every other platform has gone down.

Bratmon•30m ago
The entire pitch of Substack is "You can export the email addresses of your current subscribers at any time"

So if they stop doing the "email my subscribers whenever I post" step, another service will fill the gap pretty quick.

rsingel•25m ago
Substack notes is non exportable; the newsletter now no longer have a link to read it on your site on substack and instead link to the substack app, and subscriptions started in the app pay Substack through Apple and Google and you can't export them.

Substack has become a roach motel but they pretend otherwise

Forgeties79•25m ago
Until they make it more difficult to export lol that’s the real canary in the coal mine if you ask me.
ImJamal•21m ago
If Substack stops supporting that feature you would end up losing all of your subscribers when you move to the alternative unless you happen to have an up to date export.
carlosjobim•15m ago
> How do we know they won't start limiting your reach in the future?

You can never know anything about what anybody will do in the future? You can't. Why do hackers always use this argument against everything?

throw1234567891•5m ago
When they will, you’ll be free to take action.
cosmicgadget•34m ago
I mean, can't you accomplish the same thing with "enter your email/social handle to be notified when I post something"?
bonestamp2•31m ago
For sure. I had a huge following on my wordpress blog 15 years ago and email was how everyone got notified of new content. I'm sure there's a way to at least do sms now if people want that level of notification.
ImJamal•14m ago
Most writers just want to write and don't want to start maintaining servers and databases to handle the collection and storing of emails. This is why they outsource that functionality to a service like Substack.
yrds96•32m ago
Fediverse. We need to push Fediverse
game_the0ry•29m ago
> You need a push mechanism to reach readers.

Ghost blog includes newsletter for push.

BorisMelnik•24m ago
this tide will turn, and the day of reckoning is coming for AI slop and large domains owning the search results. small publishers are going to have their time very soon.
zahlman•20m ago
What if I want people to read me without needing a subscription or email disclosure?

What's the email for anyway? So that you can get sent notifications of new posts? ... People read those kinds of emails? I always curse myself for finding a way to get them sent to myself, and file them away somewhere until I can figure out how to turn them off.

goostavos•12m ago
...I use email notifications. I follow very few people (fewer than 10), so I'm always happy when an email pops up letting me know they've written something.

I don't pay attention to my RSS reader, and barely use social media. For whatever reason, email works for me.

nickthegreek•3m ago
medium is where you can post and get a bit of what substack offers while also making your post freely available if you chose.

on substack, you get the whole newsletter in the email. you dont need to go to a website. I use https://kill-the-newsletter.com/ to put them in my rss though.

efilife•17m ago
It's addressed in the article
f311a•12m ago
> no one will visit your website.

Yep, let's suppose an average HN user reads 30-100 article a month on independent websites (personal domains) posted on HN. Out of 100, he probably subscribes to 0-2 at best (via RSS/e-mail). Now, imagine, how many times you need to appear on HN to get your own audience. There is too much friction for a user to subscribe.

Substack is similar to a social platform, people open it to read new articles in the similar way to HN and they can subscribe to anyone by pressing a single button. There is recommendation feed as well.

Since Google search for tech content is dead, getting views on independent blogs is extremely hard.