There's millions of such CDs in the wild, both shareware and fully purchased copies.
The hacker groups would be a little frustrated trying to find all of the different CDs.
I did, however, purchase Quake II and III when they were released. And many years later bought Quake on Steam. I think they got their money's worth from me after all.
(There were some who believed that making the shareware disc easily-crackable was an intentional stroke of genius. It got people who couldn't afford the full retail version to buy the game and expand its popularity. After all, $10 was a fairly ludicrous amount of money to pay for shareware game. Shareware CDs tended to be $5 on the high end, or free with most computer/gaming magazines.)
is it an AI-generated image of 1990s CompUSA?
ranger_danger•45m ago
By that logic, wouldn't real symmetric crypto also be considered the same, since it's still just math that similarly swaps the data with other bytes, based on an "obscured" password or key?
_def•36m ago
chungy•26m ago
Mind, this was also intended for a world where internet connectivity was not to be expected. The majority of PC owners were not online.
smackeyacky•22m ago
ekelsen•15m ago
I feel like either way, you'd need the key to be different for every CD, otherwise you could just share the shared key. But if the encryption of every CD is different, why not just share the block cipher key directly? They can have a list of CDs and the associated key(s).
What additional security or functionality does an RSA like step add here?
1970-01-01•25m ago