Governments and AI billionaires are all talking about some utopian future where we are all free to do what we want and have a universal basic income to support us. But the deployment of a draconian surveillance network, militarised police, domestic concentration camps and 'left wing terrorist' rhetoric is not painting a picture of a future utopia.
I am so done sugar coating shit for these people who refuse to acknowledge the direction our civil liberties are heading.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/oracle-ceo-larry-ellison-says...
2021 homicides: 161
2025 homicides: 96
The purpose of enforcement is to reduce the amount of crime not to maximize the percentage of prosecuted crime.
https://www.atlantaga.gov/Home/Components/News/News/13687/67...
https://www.11alive.com/article/news/crime/sharp-drop-in-atl...
Crime is complex, and it’s incredibly silly to look at those two variables and call it a day.
Also, show proof.
Prove to me it wasn't my hamburger eating.
Similar to how gun laws aren't about the safety of guns, I think Flock cameras, and other surveillance technologies simply encroach on individual freedoms.
A citizen should be reasonably free from government surveillance.
...but it can. Unfortunately something like this with a huge number of independent variables, it's hard to know.
Cameras do not prevent crime. This has been eminently shown endlessly. Now ideally they help then find the culprits, but in practice this just isn't happening.
It also begs the question of if there is a deterrent effect from cameras to commit homicide, couldn't that deterrent be achieved with a far less controversial technology?
chaps•40m ago
Mistletoe•36m ago