frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

AWS Acquires DuckDB

https://ducklabs.com/news/2026/08/26/ducklabs-to-join-aws
377•onderkalaci•1h ago•87 comments

GLM-5.3-Flash

https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3-flash
102•Philpax•22m ago•24 comments

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: A New Architecture, Towards Ultimate Cost-Efficiency

https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.8-flash-next
208•tosh•1h ago•67 comments

RAG Is Simpler Than You Think

https://www.lighthousenewsletter.com/p/rag-is-simpler-than-you-think
246•j0selit0•5h ago•110 comments

A curmudgeon tries a language server

https://entropicthoughts.com/curmudgeon-tries-language-server
36•crescit_eundo•1h ago•11 comments

Meta reaches $16.68B settlement over social media harms to children

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/meta-settles-with-us-states-over-social-media-harms-2026-08-26/
140•bhouston•1h ago•84 comments

Oldinsurancemaps.net is now a Charter Project

https://openstreetmap.us/news/2026/08/oim-charter-project/
121•altilunium•5h ago•20 comments

Z.ai confirms Ox Alpha is a new GLM-series model and will release its weights

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-08-26/china-s-z-ai-made-ox-alpha-stealth-model-that-...
289•garo-pro•4h ago•115 comments

Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/08/apple-introduces-m6-and-m5-ultra-for-a-big-leap-in-perform...
1242•interpol_p•1d ago•1189 comments

Stalking the Wily Hacker: 40 years later – Cliff Stoll [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=656058JxTM0
182•zoenolan•4d ago•51 comments

Proliferate (YC S25) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/proliferate/jobs/OgpCKYJ-founding-product-engineer
1•pablo24602•2h ago

Beyond Recall and the Illusion of Competence

https://var0.xyz/posts/beyond-recall-and-the-illusion-of-competence.html
52•tuxie_•4h ago•17 comments

FDA authorizes first wearable device that monitors ketone and blood sugar levels

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-first-wearable-device-continuo...
463•sunnynagra•19h ago•210 comments

Value Classes Still Need Compiler Sympathy

https://johan-sjolen.github.io/post/compiler-sympathy/compiler-sympathy/
58•lichtenberger•5h ago•24 comments

OpenAI Jalapeño: Better than Nvidia Blackwell

https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/openai-jalapeno-better-than-nvidia
549•bmulholland•1d ago•345 comments

Queryable Executables

https://fzakaria.com/2026/08/24/actually-queryable-executables
264•rguiscard•14h ago•73 comments

New Mac Studio with M5 Max and M5 Ultra

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/08/apple-introduces-new-mac-studio-with-m5-max-and-m5-ultra/
798•interpol_p•1d ago•534 comments

Harvest (IBM 7950): Supercomputer for cryptanalysis at the NSA in the Cold War

https://spectrum.ieee.org/cold-war-codebreaker-nsa-ibm
66•jnord•9h ago•17 comments

Wiped out: US faces surging toilet paper prices amid trade war with Canada

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/26/paper-product-toilet-paper-tariffs-us-canada
21•mikhael•1h ago•6 comments

Black hole singularity is a surface not a point

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21590
286•raattgift•21h ago•198 comments

New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/08/apple-unveils-a-more-powerful-mac-mini-featuring-the-all-n...
522•runako•1d ago•324 comments

Maiao: Gerrit-style code review workflow for GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, others

https://github.com/runetes/maiao
102•zdw•15h ago•63 comments

Show HN: Buslens – where can I get to by bus? (UK)

https://rupertlinacre.com/buslens/
69•RobinL•6h ago•47 comments

When str.lower() is a security vulnerability in Python

https://sethmlarson.dev/when-str-lower-is-a-security-vulnerability
160•rbanffy•17h ago•68 comments

Building a backyard office, the build and cost breakdown

https://www.imkylelambert.com/articles/building-a-backyard-office-the-build-and-cost-breakdown
390•surprisetalk•1d ago•242 comments

Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1442
1071•Banditoz•21h ago•908 comments

Tooltips need a delay, and then they need to skip it

https://blog.master.dev/tooltips-need-a-delay-and-then-they-need-to-skip-it/
211•ibobev•21h ago•74 comments

Run OpenBSD on DigitalOcean for $4/month

https://nil.wallyjones.com/run-openbsd-on-digitalocean-for-4month/
195•speckx•21h ago•88 comments

LibreOffice 26.8 Released with Many Nice Improvements

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/26.8
14•DemiGuru•2h ago•1 comments

Bomb fishing is wreaking havoc on Indonesia's coral reefs

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/bomb-fishing-coral-reefs
341•speckx•1d ago•187 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta reaches $16.68B settlement over social media harms to children

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/meta-settles-with-us-states-over-social-media-harms-2026-08-26/
135•bhouston•1h ago

Comments

JumpCrisscross•52m ago
“Shares of Meta rose 4.4% in pre-market trading.”
scrumper•45m ago
A measure of the market's perception of the threat to Meta from these lawsuits. The uncertainty is over now, so the price goes back up.

I'm interested in the settlement details - yes $16bn ok fine but any behavioral or structural changes? If it's just financial, nothing really changes... (EDIT: I see julianpye found some details in the WSJ, in another comment. There are some feature adjustments.)

JumpCrisscross•36m ago
> the settlement details

“Meta will initially pay about $12 billion. That sum increases to $17.1 billion if Snap, TikTok and YouTube also settle with the states and agree to financial penalties and product changes.

…

The settlement will effectively force Meta to make major product changes for all U.S. users. The company agreed to interrupt endless scrolling and to impose two-hour daily time limits on Instagram and Facebook. To avoid addictive use and sleep interruptions, the company will limit usage between midnight and 6 a.m. and silence notifications between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

Meta will also limit features that psychologists link to negative social comparisons, such as beauty filters and a tallying of the ‘like’ button clicks. It will also strengthen age verification tools and parental controls” [1].

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/technology/meta-settlemen...

smugma•40m ago
Short-lived. Down to flat now.
julianpye•46m ago
The WSJ reports: "As part of the settlement agreement, Meta will also make sweeping changes to its services, Facebook and Instagram, including implementing a default two-hour time limit on its apps for users under 18."

The question is of course if these limits are enforced and if they are shared across other services.

kwanbix•42m ago
Two hours is one hour too long if you ask me.

This should be implemented also for adults.

And non-avoidable.

dmoose•33m ago
Two hours is two hours too long.
okdood64•4m ago
Adults can’t decide for themselves?
richwater•3m ago
Why do you support a nanny state that tells adults what content they are allowed to consume?
_ink_•41m ago
Probably default setting that can be changed by the under aged user. And probably per app or even per account.
pelagicAustral
asf1254•45m ago
1% of their market cap. I don't think we'll see someone with a net worth of $100,000 paying only a $1000 fine for harming children.
iamacyborg•33m ago
If the handling of the Epstein files in the US is anything to go by, they’d get away scot free.
ben_w•26m ago
Market cap is generally the wrong measure. If you registered asf1254 Inc., and it was always just you, and it traded like Meta stocks trade, then "asf1254 Inc." would have a market cap ~6.2× whatever you're currently earning.

i.e., if you earn $100k/year, you'd be "worth" $620k, and 1% of that would be a fine of $6200.

dbbk•25m ago
Market cap isn't real money
micromacrofoot•12m ago
it's funny how it's real money when it's useful and fake money when it's not
kwanbix•45m ago
Only to children? What about adults? Yes, I know we are supposed to be more responsible, but this things are made to be addicted and you don't realize until it is too late.
_ink_•43m ago
Pay 25% from your 2025 profit for harming children since at least 2019 and be able to continue doing so. Sounds like a loss for society and a win for Meta.
oneneptune•38m ago
The article outlines several changes Meta is having to implement that curbs the "and be able to continue doing so" argument a bit. That said, I wish these settlements included tobacco-esque requirements for ongoing funds to educate people. The tobacco settlement funds have been somewhat successful.
qwertox•4m ago
a bit
aprilthird2021•37m ago
I dunno, I kinda feel they have to pay the price for governments not having applicable regulations on this kinda stuff.

It's not reasonable to expect them to put up rules their competition don't have to abide by, and if the government has 0 rules regarding social media, what should they do?

They're not solely responsible for phone addiction but none of their competitors get sued the same...

iso1631•19m ago
You can't use the word "reasonable" when dealing with companies with more power than most governments
alfalfasprout•36m ago
Yeah but politicians get to claim this is a win. Let's be honest, that's the real reason the prosecution went for a deal this small.
buellerbueller•43m ago
Shame; the states involved has an opportunity for actual redress of harms, as opposed to just some campaign-worthy soundbyte.
hugodan•37m ago
still feels like they got away easy for raping children's minds

"Meta has long argued it could not have misled consumers about whether its services were addictive because "social media addiction" is not a recognized psychiatric condition."

that's a nice escape hatch, considering that they are using all the tricks in the book (from online gambling, etc) and then some

aprilthird2021•34m ago
This is crazy, Meta is not solely responsible for people and kids having addiction to their phones (very similar if not identical to social media addiction).

Gambling has regulations all the companies have to abide by. Social media and content platforms have nothing like that.

forestrywat•33m ago
They are a very, very, very significant contributor.
Wolfbeta•29m ago
Who is paying for their internet access?
forestrywat•22m ago
Imagine being so out of touch that you think parents are generally equipped with the knowledge, features, and emotional capacity to manage their child's entire exposure to the internet in a way they cannot or will not circumvent. Laughable.
techpression•15m ago
4ndrewl•33m ago
Table stakes. Just the cost of doing business.

A bit like millionaires who park illegally because "it only cost $100 to park here, and my PA will do the admin"

jbombadil•30m ago
Would be nice to be able to enable these features as an adult (stop autoplay videos and no algorithmic feed).

Also, I’m surprised by the lack of enforcement to remove infinite scrolling.

paulkrush•20m ago
I want sliders to control the feed.
ChicagoBoy11•29m ago
As a school administrator, this is pretty disappointing.

I've included slides showing a graphic of someone in a slot machine next to a screenshot of Instagram, and would do an activity where the children themselves drew connections of what they saw/knew. It was not difficult, and they hit it out of the park every time.

The fact that the possible damages sought was over 200 billion, and this settlement clocks in at less than ten percent of that value plus "concessions" that really at this point are just tablestakes for them product itself to just be viable given the parent backlash against these things, is incredibly disappointing. They have cost people on the periphery of this A LOT more, and from a merely business proposition, the wanton disregard for safety in this case proved to be a smart business move. The lawsuit should have had a chilling effect on anyone trying to do anything similar lately, but that will not be the case.

fivetenpen•27m ago
Why not just ban the engagement algorithm completely. Adults are just as susceptible to addiction.
jimmyjazz14•4m ago
Why not just ban all non government approved speech, less we hear something that might hurt our feelings or make us engage in wrongthink.
testaccount28•3m ago
what is "the engagement algorithm"?
dbbk•25m ago
I absolutely hate these settlement endings. The states were going to win.
alpineman•24m ago
Shameful behavior. Anyone working on making these products more addictive or otherwise benefitting from their negative impact on society and politics should take a long hard look in the mirror.
paxys•24m ago
For context Meta had $61.8 billion revenue and $15.85 billion net income in Q2 2026. So this entire “existential threat” of teenage safety amounts to one bad quarter for the company, and they will continue on unscathed.
itsryanlenk•23m ago
As long as you have enough money to throw billion dollar darts at a trillion dollar dart board you're gonna skate out cleanly every time. There's a bigger problem here and everyone knows it.
gib444•22m ago
Pocket change
datakan•20m ago
Who gets the money?
electriclove•3m ago
Yup, exactly!
stego-tech•18m ago
So a literal slap on the wrist that doesn’t discourage or stop the actually harmful behavior.

Look, I get that certain demographics are terrified of another Arthur Andersen-esque collapse of a firm, but if we don’t punish companies to the point of possible insolvency, then we’re creating a moral hazard wherein more companies will continue engaging in harmful behavior because they know they won’t ever be held properly accountable.

If we actually harmed (or even bankrupted) Meta with a suitable fine relative to the harms inflicted, you’d see the wider social media industry (and adjacent tech companies) clean up their shit really fucking fast to avoid a similar fate.

Ekaros•18m ago
Business as usual. The ownership class will always win. At this point I really doubt we will ever get anything that isn't either small payment relatively or something they can't weasel out of.
iso1631•17m ago
Isn't this just the EU wanting to tax big american businesses?
Ekaros•16m ago
Here it is states of USA wanting to tax corporation not incorporated in them. So pure greed.
jcmoscon•17m ago
I think worse than social media nowadays is youtube shorts. That thing is so addictive to kids. I wish there was a way to delete shorts from youtube and have only long form videos available in the app.
myko•9m ago
100%, Shorts are an abomination.
Devasta•15m ago
Anything that doesn't have Zuckerberg and the rest of the top brass in a gulag the rest of their lives doesn't go far enough.
hax0ron3•13m ago
So if I write a book that your kid just can't stop reading it over and over again because I deliberately made it compulsively re-readable, and then your kid develops some kind of issues because my book is so interesting to him, you can sue me and win?

I don't like that idea. Personally, I value free speech more than some supposed "harms" done to children by content. Content that they can easily stop consuming by just closing the app.

rlpb•10m ago
It's established that exposing children to bad things causes harm. This isn't specific to technology. "Free speech" isn't a concept that applies to the exposure of harmful speech to children.
65•9m ago
I agree, I should be allowed to give children my amazing crystal meth, it's such an untapped market.
DonHopkins•3m ago
[delayed]
skizm•12m ago
The other big tech companies were able to keep their settlement amounts private, since they settled before this case went to court. I wonder how their settlements compare. I bet they were much smaller given Meta took an actual L in court, they probably had less leverage when negotiating this number.
foolinaround•9m ago
who receives (or has received) actual payments ( other than the lawyers)? I think we need some service that is able to break this out
xvxvx•6m ago
I’m beyond sick of how this country operates. This is small potatoes for Meta and stops the $1T+ lawsuit, which would have had an actual impact on these scumbags.

Time and time again it’s the same story: the Protestant worship of money and wealth at the expense of others. If it makes money then it’s a blessing from God, and thus cannot be evil.

Sorry, Americans, but your children will be mind raped with social media and pornography to grow the GDP. Don’t put up a fight: the government has their back. And an army.

electriclove•4m ago
Protestant? that's a cute misdirection
okokwhatever•5m ago
Ok, but how the kids will recover from all this harm? Is this money gonna be used correctly for once?
•
41m ago
So nice of them to let kids lose their minds 2 hours at the time.
aprilthird2021•33m ago
Meta has the pocketbook to appeal this to a non-jury setup where they'd be more likely to win (imo most juries are ready to agree to any penalty on social media companies for any reason)
Noaidi•11m ago
And if people do not think Meta settled without input from the Trump administration and a possible reward for doing so, well, I got this bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, barely used.

I wonder which way Facebook's algorithms will tilt in this years mid-term elections....

nerder92•14m ago
> META Total Annual Revenue in 2025: $200.97 billion (up from $164.50 billion in 2024).

They literally don’t care.

Imagine thinking parents stand a snowballs chance in hell fighting against products explicitly made to exploit their children from companies spending billions on it. It’s like 0.00001% of parents that has those skills, if that.
kstrauser•32m ago
True. They’re just one of the largest companies who deliberately engineered their software to be addictive, the Sacklers of social media, if you will.
datsci_est_2015•25m ago
> Gambling has regulations all the companies have to abide by. Social media and content platforms have nothing like that.

Ah, then I’m sure Meta will be quite happy to support legislation that requires a message to be displayed every time you open the app, upload a photo, or post a comment:

  - “Social media use is shown to directly cause significant mental health distress, especially to children. Continue? Yes / Close / Configure allowed applications”
Similar to tobacco products.
Barbing•26m ago
>[irreparably damaging] children's minds

I’d love for someone to get me into Mark Zuckerberg’s head on why he should keep doing what he’s doing.

Jgrubb•23m ago
What's he gonna do? There is no "enough" with some personalities, there is only "more".
bakies•22m ago
Money!
Barbing•20m ago
Figure his own mental steelmans are legitimately more complex, though. And more faulty.
wyre•19m ago
If he doesn’t do it someone else will.

Also, I’m sure Peter Thiel being one of his first major investors has something to do with it.

api•21m ago
The smoking gun here is that they actually hired psychologists and experts in creating addictive stuff from e.g. the gambling industry. It clearly shows that their intent was "make this as addictive as possible."

Then they ignored tons and tons of warning signs that this was having a negative effect especially on children and the elderly.

Now I think they need to hit YouTube, TikTok, and addiction-engineered loot box games. If we're establishing the precedent that addiction-engineering is bad, that's a huge win for our civilization.

Pretty much the entire mobile ecosystem is a hellscape of black hat attacks on the human central nervous system. You can do it via a web browser or a desktop too but when you do it on a phone the portability and something about the form factor and touch interface seems to supercharge it.

65•11m ago
All those smart Stanford grads got to make the world a better place by psychologically damaging millions of children.
pwg•10m ago
> Then they ignored tons and tons of warning signs that this was having a negative effect especially on children and the elderly.

So long as the changes produced (to their belief) increases in advertising revenue, they didn't care. More ad money was all that mattered.

mapotofu•12m ago
The system rewards psychopaths like Mark. Decent people, like Tom from MySpace, cash their check when they have more than they need. Demons, like Mark, want more and more and more and more- they will go to any lengths to get it because screw everyone else, they are lessers. That’s Mark and that’s the system rewarding him. We all know Tom is way cooler.
giwook•10m ago
Agreed, especially considering Meta made $60.46 billion in profit in 2025 alone.
superxpro12•3m ago
not a recognized psychiatric condition as they employ how many psychiatrists on staff to specifically engineer this addition. i hate that the standard of evidence for these claims is impossibly high. Like you need an email from zuck himself that says "i want to mind rape young boys"... when there's mountains of evidence of them working to that exact goal... they just didnt say "mind rape young boys". The actions and results speak plainly enough. WE dont need zuck himself to confirm it.
tiahura•3m ago
America defaults to free. That's very unsettling for those that an authoritarian approach.

Maybe all these state AGs knew there was a good chance of losing because the facts aren't as strong as the narrative?