If you’re using MCP in production, what are you using it for? What advantages have you found over a normal API or direct tool integration or just CLI?
If you’re using MCP in production, what are you using it for? What advantages have you found over a normal API or direct tool integration or just CLI?
It searches to make sure it isn't a duplicate, writes up the ticket, then submits it.
Because it's a production tool, we want the cheapest possible one without it being too inaccurate. If you used a API etc, you'd end up building what's effectively a MCP-like adapter on top of it anyway so it could communicate in natural language instead of dealing with JSON and such.
Linear's MCP is also very clean and well designed, probably one of their core advantages over, say, Jira. I wouldn't know what the API looks like because the MCP works great.
I was under the impression that Linear's MCP server code isn't public. How do you know that it's well-designed beyond following spec[1][2]?
[1] https://linear.app/docs/mcp [2] https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2026-07-28
We have received very good feedback from clients across the enterprise and consumer segments, they really like it.
By what metric? I would expect that a thin API client (with readable code) is generally going to out-perform a tool-surface which you don't have the ability to manage/edit.
Getting things like this to work well, for me, often boils down to finding out the things I don't know that I don't know in as little time as possible. I worked with Claude to create a basic debugging front-end as part of that - for my own use, inspecting the data, looking for patterns - when, largely on a whim, I asked Claude to create an MCP interface on top: last run status, what's looking good, whats not, where are the coverage gaps in the individual data points.
And I added the MVP to Claude and would check in regularly to ask how things were going.
And then - I'd ask for some nuance about why something doesn't look quite right. Or what happened to councils in general last night? And - out of nowhere, not being prompted or asked - Claude would query the MCP alongside looking at the code. Immediate production-grade insight while I'm debugging from the comfort of my chair.
And I thought "Oh."
And "this is really quite good," because the key detail is, I think, if an MCP is good and works well, and relevant to what you're doing every day at that point in time, it's yet another addition to your toolbox.
And that got me thinking about how I can do the same for my 9-5 users.
igor_nast•13h ago
Read more about mcp tools/resources/prompts.
latchkey•51m ago
DANmode•41m ago
This makes it a little more interesting to me, knowing those results.
It definitely underlines what we already know about the specific weaknesses of LLMs replies/results.
latchkey•38m ago
DANmode•22m ago
Corporate still runs lots of bullshit for compliance, though.
latchkey•15m ago