It warms my heart every time I see an interactive proof assistant being used to improve rather than simply slow down mathematical thinking.
After years of using the things, I believe not enough focus is given to high-velocity uses of proof assistants for prototyping. They can altogether replace scratch paper for fumbling around with new concepts.
dnautics•10m ago
WIP, but that is the target ethos in the prover I'm building:
Its painfully verbose and explicit but its designed to let you cut down to the structure of the proof with a query language
generationP•5m ago
This one is not just in Dummit and Foote; it's just too easy to miss. I'd guess it appears in half the places that state this result. Fixed it in my own lecture notes a few months ago.
Paracompact•24m ago
After years of using the things, I believe not enough focus is given to high-velocity uses of proof assistants for prototyping. They can altogether replace scratch paper for fumbling around with new concepts.
dnautics•10m ago
https://github.com/ityonemo/bpa
Its painfully verbose and explicit but its designed to let you cut down to the structure of the proof with a query language