AI slop to the max, what a bad article.

Now on the issue itself: Why doesn't Tesla report the version and whether it was FSD or Autopilot?

I always get baited by Electrek headlines and then remember it's some of the most blatant examples of AI writing. They don't even pretend to write it themselves.

Do you know how humans run stop lights and kill people, how does it compare?

Tesla now has ~40 level 4 automated taxis in operation with no pedals or steering wheel. When these have an accident they can't blame a non-existent driver for mashing a non-existent accelerator pedal. And they are their own insurance company. A few fatalities in the Cybercab could squelch the whole rollout, even if the stats show it's safer than human drivers.

As a human driver with declining capabilities who will need level 4 autopilot before long to stay independent, I'm rooting for FSD.

> Reading a stop sign and deciding whether to stop is a City-Streets function, and that’s FSD. Basic Autopilot is built as a highway lane-keeping system, and it does not respond to stop signs. So a driver-assist car verified engaged as it ran a stop sign was, most likely, running FSD.

This just isn't true, "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" is a feature of basic autopilot on Model 3s.

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/2017_2023_model3/en_eu/GU...

This part is wild to me:

    > Subject vehicle (Tesla) pre-crash speed: 4 mph

If true, how could the driver of the other car have been killed?

I can't help but think we need a more extensive "Flight Data Recorder" sort of object for, at least, self-driving cars if not all of them. Event Data Recorder's are coming and mandated for 2021+ but I think they need to go further, IMO. Police in my area already do not bother responding, and insurance just does 50/50 unless theirs dash cams. Why not just make them integrated and mandatory along with other telemetry?