It sounds like there could be something extremely interesting in this article, but the writing style is really off-putting.
> "on staging first and then on production at 23:40"
Why does the reader need to know the exact minute-to-minute timeline?
Literally raised 4 years ago: https://github.com/prisma/orm/discussions/15164
I'm not sure the real intention of this blogpost, but my takeaway is "someone who has no idea what is going on finds a problem <LLM OF CHOICE> left for them, like a little code land mine".
> I didn't. I gave Claude Code the guest's screenshot and asked whether the problem was ours or his phone's. It answered that in twenty minutes and, while verifying the deploy, noticed the ten-second floor and kept pulling: the logs by hour, the 47 ms TCP measurement, the pg_stat_statements query, the arithmetic.
If your brain, dear reader, is aneurysm-proof, by all means go ahead and read TFA.
You won't learn much, though, but then again neither did its author.
And that's not slop, it's the real smoking load bearing foot gun.
First of all, you still have the images problem (among others). Loading your home site takes around 60MB of downloads, including the autoloading 40MB MP4 file. Reduce resolution and compress. You don't need a phone to reproduce that, you just need to open your web browser development tools and reload the site to see how heavy is it. Also, the memory use calculation is off, but that's not important because probably an LLM did it.
Second, your API in karibukit.com is down
Don't rely that much in the LLM. Check things with your own eyes.
OG_BME•55m ago
tecleandor•36m ago
The horror.
I'd rather read a "badly written" and to the point story, than a clone of the last 20 postmortem-ish/incredible discovery stories I've seen this week.