Now everyone can understand the math.
Heres the template:
"I" <--- prompted some LLM
"built" <--- to generate code for a
"fastest" <-- insert specious claim here
"PHP server" <-- thing
"And I prompted the LLM to build a website" <---- link
Im sorry folks but this just doesnt cut it anymore. I dont think it ever did.
On a positive note: the performance is genuinely impressive.. what does it take to unlock this performance if I'm NOT running one of the big "usual" frameworks? The devil is always in the detail, best get some practical advice up on exactly what needs to happen with a medium piece of custom code to get it to said max performance.
> run many workers. The server loads your entire framework into a parent process, then calls pcntl_fork() to create workers. The kernel marks the parent’s pages copy-on-write. Workers share every loaded class — they only pay for pages they actually write to during the request.
So its essentially preloading the memory layout. Cool idea.
mpalmer•45m ago
"no Docker" - so what? Docker is a tool. Running containers on Linux has extremely low overhead. No idea what this is about.
You didn't spend the effort to decorate the slop with your rationale for these choices, so I see no evidence that you built any of this.
tobz1000•38m ago
So if it fixes a bug where function was accidentally deleting a file, it will update the function's documentation with "does not delete any important files", as if that's a key feature and not just one of a million things it should not do.
The same pattern repeats when an LLM is left to generate its own copy after a brainstorming and architecting session. It has no concept of what's important to the end-user.
ramon156•34m ago
iinnPP•25m ago
bel8•35m ago
PHP doesn't have a production grade built-in server like .NET's Kestrel.
vachina•26m ago
As in there’s very little ways to fuck up a PHP setup.
You just turn it on and it runs.
tcfhgj•6m ago