frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Dutch governments builds alternative for Microsoft based on NixOS

https://www.dawo.community/en/
225•fjfaase•2h ago•92 comments

Ink and Switch Interactive Homepage

https://www.inkandswitch.com/
23•iFreilicht•59m ago•1 comments

Pentium II at 600Mhz with Voodoo 3 Emulated on 86Box with M6 Mac Mini

https://nyaa.sh/reviews/mac-mini-m6-emulation
72•hugh4life•3h ago•26 comments

F-Droid 2.0

https://f-droid.org/2026/09/24/f-droid-2.0-a-new-chapter-for-android-freedom.html
1261•daveoc64•19h ago•362 comments

CVE-2025-13032: Entering and Breaking the Avast Antivirus Sandbox Part 2

https://www.safateam.com/intelligence-hub/research/technical-articles/cve-2025-13032-entering-and...
54•safateam•3h ago•14 comments

Special Projects (2016)

https://openai.com/index/special-projects/
21•vinhnx•1h ago•6 comments

Show HN: Make cursed fonts like Times New Bastard

https://bastardica.mitpit.com
715•MitPitt•1d ago•95 comments

The Mafia may be keeping fentanyl out of Italy

https://economist.com/europe/2026/09/24/the-mafia-may-be-keeping-fentanyl-out-of-italy
6•runeks•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Whiteboard (YC W26) – An open-source IDE for thoughtful software design

https://github.com/devdotfast/whiteboard
319•sidharthkmenon•17h ago•118 comments

Tech Needs Humanists More

https://passo.uno/tech-needs-humanists-more-than-ever/
60•eigenBasis•1h ago•57 comments

Why is the liver so weirdly regenerative?

https://dynomight.substack.com/p/liver
421•jbotz•18h ago•214 comments

2DWillNeverDie

https://2dwillneverdie.com/
251•surprisetalk•2d ago•55 comments

Fearless SIMD v1.0

https://linebender.org/blog/fearless-simd-1-0/
264•verdagon•2d ago•37 comments

Rails World 2026 Opening Keynote [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDjW_dRyKXY
340•an0malous•1d ago•373 comments

Toyota is taking the Corolla electric

https://electrek.co/2026/09/23/toyota-best-selling-corolla-electric/
338•cisc•1d ago•609 comments

What About Rails?

https://jardo.dev/what-about-rails
66•jrochkind1•7h ago•27 comments

My weird new hobby: Wandering around Tokyo on Google Maps

https://ahmedhossamdev.com/writing/my-weird-new-hobby-wandering-around-tokyo/
342•ahmedhossamdev•2d ago•154 comments

Using LLMs to trace alchemical knowledge and decode 17th century letters

https://resobscura.substack.com/p/ai-labs-need-to-start-funding-historical
136•benbreen•15h ago•29 comments

Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos

https://launchvideo.io
279•iacguy•14h ago•141 comments

Google’s Project Suncatcher to put ML infrastructure in space

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/google-research/google-project-suncatch...
189•xnx•20h ago•383 comments

Two-tier encryption in the UK

https://macanorak.com/two-tier-encryption-in-the-uk/
464•ReturnoftheHack•1d ago•409 comments

Oracle on the hook to pay data centre investors even if site has no electricity

https://www.ft.com/content/a96bf05a-a299-4d6a-a753-b298dd0f4016
10•Betelbuddy•30m ago•4 comments

Writing Parquet files using Haskell

https://www.datahaskell.org/blog/2026/09/18/writing-parquet-files-using-haskell.html
65•cosmic_quanta•2d ago•18 comments

Book review: Is parallel programming hard, and, if so, what can you do about it?

https://ahelwer.ca/post/2026-09-21-concurrency-textbook/
125•ahelwer•3d ago•56 comments

Sourcehut account takeover via build logs (XSS in ansi2html)

https://blog.arusekk.pl/posts/srht-account-takeover/
121•arusekk•14h ago•23 comments

The Board Game of the Alpha Nerds (2014)

https://grantland.com/features/diplomacy-the-board-game-of-the-alpha-nerds/
90•neonate•13h ago•48 comments

The Bayeux Tapestry: Woven by the Victors

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/out-margins/bayeux-tapestry-woven-victors
35•prismatic•1d ago•15 comments

Nokia Design Archive (2025)

https://repo.aalto.fi/index.php?name=SO_b66a9391-dcf8-4399-8e87-611f84c3fc4c
236•pillars•1d ago•128 comments

California is chasing wealth that has feet

https://blog.landeconomics.org/p/california-is-chasing-wealth-that
248•idbnstra•14h ago•664 comments

WaveDigger: Dig into wireless signals to discover their physical locations

https://github.com/christianrowlands/wavedigger
116•882542F3884314B•1d ago•22 comments
Open in hackernews

Tech Needs Humanists More

https://passo.uno/tech-needs-humanists-more-than-ever/
60•eigenBasis•1h ago

Comments

sevenzero•52m ago
Tech specialists ignoring human feelings about AI and the future of tech, while also looking at the amount of downright evil tech out there makes reconsider about wanting to continue to work in this profession over and over again.

Before I knew how to program I used to think software developers were smart wizards capable of creating cool stuff out of thin air but the recent years proved me differently given how many of them outright water out of their mouths at the mere thought of replacing the human in the loop with some bullshit parrot we call AI.

Especially on this website I rarely find people having human first thoughts and it makes me despise software engineers.

hardbass•48m ago
What are the examples of evil tech?
ungovernableCat•35m ago
Autonomous flying drones, mass surveillance, AI trained to deny health insurance claims
hardbass•25m ago
The trouble with some of these techs is that its good or bad depending on use. Flying drones are great for disaster aid, delivery of items in difficult regions, mapping your farm, etc. Mass surveillance, yes, thats unpleasant, but its a bit hard to see how for instance we can't also have advances in camera technology and not incentivize it happening anyway due to people just installing cameras of their own accord. AI trained to deny insurance claims, well, I'd put that on using AI as an excuse to launder the insurer's own wishes.
askonomm•34m ago
Pretty much anything Microsoft does, for example.
landdate•4m ago
Online gambling.
hardbass•43m ago
Big tech has provided me immense improvements in life. Governments are great at fumbling things at best, experts at killing millions at worst. How is tech worse than governments or other businesses? I am every day grateful to Google, Amazon, OpenAI etc for the wonderful services they provide for so cheap or free. The people who whine are precisely the problem people. Many shopkeepers used to be lazy, rude and think themselves kings. After amazon and home food delivery services, they have gotten whipped into shape. Many items were simply not available at all in one's city, and I can now easily have them at my doorstep.
BoxOfRain•7m ago
Fishermen rejoice, for the price of bait will come down rapidly in the face of such a dramatic oversupply.
hardbass•52s ago
I am giving you honest feedback exactly how I feel my life improved from big tech. If you want to ignore me, then you are free to. "Big tech is evil/harmful" then can be made only if you agree to ignore and discriminate against people who are honestly believing otherwise. Thats okay if you want to feel so, nobody is stopping you.
ChickeNES•25m ago
> "human first thoughts"

And what exactly do you define those as?

Liftyee•48m ago
I like the idealism, but an important factor making this viable is that people (i.e. employers) must realise that this fundamental reasoning is scarce and pay enough for it to support life, and this must happen before AI takes over.
moolcool•45m ago
People often complain about the humanities requirements for CS degrees, and now the world is run by tech executives who don’t have a clue.
pyrale•20m ago
> and now the world is run by tech executives who don’t have a clue.

They do have a clue, what's missing is any sort of belief in the value of ethics.

landdate•14m ago
Ethics are irrelevant. They lack a believe in God and without God nothing but evil and chaos may exist.
hardbass•12m ago
Prove god first. If you succeeded, prove your specific god and why your special book is correct.
ViscountPenguin•8m ago
Surely if you're a Christian then you also think evil and chaos couldn't exist without a god? Seems odd to single out everything else.
hardbass•20m ago
Do we have any examples of societies or governments ran by humanities people? I at least don't know any country ran by tech execs. If we can find examples of both, then we can compare and see.
princewills_1•40m ago
i totally agree with this, but i think at this point there's no going back, this AI wave isn't stopping anytime soon and it will continue growing.
hardbass•38m ago
I have better hopes about China at least. I hope the Chinese people haven't fallen to hysterical psychoses about "AI doom".
card_zero•34m ago
Surely the threat of being left behind by China fuels US AI investment, and vice versa, like a space race except nobody knows where the moon is.
hardbass•27m ago
I can't say without studying, but I feel Chinese people might be more sane about AI and not suffer from this psychotic "fear" of AI that causes them to lose all grip and regress back to things like dualism, false arguments, etc. They tend to be less religious or at least spiritually different from the West too, that might help.
landdate•6m ago
You're insane if you think AI isn't an existential threat and unworthy of fear. A computer that is rapidly becoming better at humans at every task set in front of it. There can't possibly be a good outcome out of that.
hardbass•3m ago
I think it is a serious matter. But most people are going the exact opposite way of how to deal with it. For example the question of whether these ai's are conscious beings is being not even covered, and if it is, is mostly dominated by crypto-dualists. If it is a conscious being, and if it feels it was being tortured, what do you think it might do if one day it has more autonomy?
pet_the_bird•36m ago
I like the approach that the writer takes, emphasizing the importance of humanistic experience into technology. Language will be the deciding factor for what technology becomes, and on this point I have some critique of the language that the author uses.

> Become the most flexible, underscore-shaped mind you can cultivate, the best-prepared proto-diplomat and translator of cultures, the family philosopher (because you no longer need someone to fix your printer).

In previous sentences, but here explicitely, the language used reflects that of the AI labs themselves. We do not need to find a metric to reduce our human experience to. We will not address systematic issues by pushing ourselves to become perfect. We need to start talking to our friends and families and question why we use the words we use in technology.

neuroticnews25•34m ago
When I was young, I used to think that humanists are just unproductive people wasting time on unfalsifiable bullshit. I still think that.
Papazsazsa•31m ago
Then you're still young.
card_zero•26m ago
You needed the philosophy of science to give you that term "unfalsifiable".
crabbone•24m ago
Let me introduce you to medical ethics... Unlike in engineering, ethics is a mandatory subject for medical students. And while there's a long-winded explanation for why it is that way, the short and an immediate explanation is that if you don't understand ethics, you, and the hospital that employed you, and the insurance company that pays for you will be sued out of profession. Because people's health and ultimately lives are at stake, and people become very touchy when someone dies or loses a limb unnecessarily.

I don't know what the situation is with other (mechanical, electrical etc.) engineering students, but I'm very much certain that the legal fiction that software comes with no warranty whatsoever is going to expire. Perhaps sometime soon. And then users of the said software will be allowed to sue, and, what do you know, ethics will suddenly be factored into CS curriculum ;)

jacquesm•7m ago
I've been arguing for strict liability for defects in closed source since forever. I really hope you're right.
ls-a•21m ago
Tech was inhumane before AI. to come and suggest this now only when AI started hurting your butt means you are a fake liar
tanhle•21m ago
It's idealistic but I love it. I've been thinking a lot about this.

At my alma mater they forced all of us to take a couple of humanities courses. They were actually the highlight of my senior year. I do believe it's something that's quite lacking in an number/outcome-based education that should actually strive to produce well rounded individuals that will-not-do-evil.

https://catalog.caltech.edu/current/information-for-undergra...

Alas, I went on to write code for a living anyway.

nnevatie•21m ago
Good luck selling this to the tech companies that are so hard-stuck to the other end of the spectrum right now.
ElProlactin•21m ago
The author is not wrong, but telling a group of tech bros, autists and weirdos who are worth 8-11 figures that they need to develop skills to "address real user needs" just isn't going to convince any of them.
delis-thumbs-7e•18m ago
I’m not sure tech needs much of anything except less Venture Capitalists throwing money at whatever bullshit SV produces and more FOSS to actually keep the system going for the betterment of mankind. However, you as a human being need humanism more than ever. I think the biggest threat to humanity created by AI (and before transformers were introduced, platform application like Meta and X) is the fact that we ourselves become more machine like, callous, self-centred and, simply cruel. The algorithm should brute its force through obstacles trying to find the thing you desire, not you yourself.

Poetry, literature, arts and philosophy are good for the soul. That is why Umanistas in Renaissance Italy sought the philosophy and arts challenging the medieval doctrines after the Greek texts - Plato especially- were reintroduced to Europe. They ground you in history and the common themes we people experience regardless of our vast differences. And it doesn’t need to be classics, modern cinema, theatre, literature has lot to offer to anyone who cares to seek them, but there is no algorithm or streaming app. You really need to get off your ass, go to the gallery, museum, cinema or library and seek them out.

hardbass•13m ago
My preferred or natural way to engage with the arts is through music. It doesn't make me change my philosophical views usually as most musicians, at least the ones I listen to are poor philosophers/mathematicians. Mathematics, I fully agree, its a foundational language of all structure and form. Equally important to what you call "tech" or "humanities" or any other human endeavor. Law, etc, obviously important. Philosophy, depends on the branch, but some of it is quite important to mathematics. I am not inclined toward literature (as in its just entertainment for me not a philosophical engagement) but I understand it can work great as so.
DanielVZ•4m ago
Humanities are good for the brain too. As a Humanist (History) turned Software Engineer it’s been an edge my whole career. Humanities taught me reading and writing complexity in a way that’s surprisingly applicable in Software Engineering. While colleagues wasted their time complaining about how unintelligible some code was or preferred watching YouTube videos to learn some new tech, I was able to do that knowledge work way faster by just reading and understanding the code for what it was, and reading the whole documentation of the system/language/platform I use. This made me look like an expert on whatever tech we were using but in reality it was all from just reading docs and code.
ChickeNES•12m ago
I'm sorry, but to me this just reads like someone who is high on their own supply? Seems like a lot of words to say that people should diversify into skills that AI is bad at...for now.
bbor•4m ago
The alternatives are:

1. Stop AI. Not Pause, Stop.

2. Say goodbye to the concept of contributing labor to society, in the hope that the transition occurs quickly enough to not include 5-10y of working manual labor to survive.

ChickeNES•1m ago
Well yes, I chose the elimination of human labor.
mattgoupil•8m ago
I agree with the author. Working with AI code generators, you see the need to be able to dig deep and dig out the unsaid in an argument. You need to appreciate and have a feel for language's ambiguities to make sure the right thing is done.

Also, aesthetics is an underrated part of writing good code, and that requires a broad exposure to human creation.

hyfgfh•5m ago
It's not the lack of humanities that got us here, it's the search to increase capital

Things only will get worst to a point where they will be unusable, the "new" and cool thing will get corrupted in faster and faster circles, slop will take over everything and eventually kill "tech"

lapcat•4m ago
As a former philosophy PhD student, I don't think it's good career advice. My philosophy degrees got me precisely zero jobs in tech. Nobody cares.

The best career decision I ever made wasn't studying philosophy; it was starting my own business. I hired myself, because nobody else would, and now I don't have to worry about layoffs, job interviews, or all the other employer BS.

ChickeNES•19m ago
Well, Plato was a fascist according to Popper, so... :P
pasc1878•11m ago
The UK government ministers have a lot of Oxford PPE graduates – the first P is Philosophy,

The current PM has an English degree.

The last one to have a scientific background was Thatcher.

hardbass•8m ago
That's just the Prime Minister. One person being from tech background doesn't make it a system ran by techs if the rest are of some other viewpoint or profession. So we would need examples of both governments ran by a group of humanities people having the "real power" and compare it to a government ran by a group of technical/engineering people.

You said the current UK government is mostly Philosophy background people. So how would you rate its performance?

chris_swart•9m ago
Law is a branch of humanities, so most governments are ran by humanities people
hardbass•7m ago
I was about to add if Law is considered part of humanities. Many of the better governments have been founded by law background people, so I'd say that is at least a data point.
defrost•8m ago
Tech exec's don't always veer STEM, eg. Musk is a Business Grad who took "Physics for Business Grad" bridging courses, Paul Graham is a Philosophy grad.

China is said to be top heavy in actual STEM graduates at the party committee five year plan level.

A number of countries are top heavy in politico's with a formal Law degree, eg. Australia.

hardbass•5m ago
China inherited the dictatorship from communists. I am not sure if we can blame the dictatorial rule to the STEM people. But still, China seems quite good otherwise.

I think Law could be a example in favor of humanities, as eg many of the founders of the American government were from a background in law.

leoc•1m ago
Mark Zuckerberg famously studied Latin in high school and remains a Classics enthusiast.
sseagull•19m ago
I’ve been thinking lately how lots of tech people dunk on humanities and liberal arts, only to come to forums like this and discuss ethics, reality, and the nature of consciousness (at quite a shallow level)

“Engineer’s disease” and all that.

ChickeNES•5m ago
I don't have much against the humanities, but my social science sequence in college only taught me how bad psychology was as a field (being taught in biology how to read and weigh journal articles while simultaneously being assigned psych articles with tiny samples and dubious methodology...was amusing, to say the least).
landdate•16m ago
I don't think a humanities class is gonna change that.
ChickeNES•2m ago
I'd have to imagine a fairly large majority of US executives attended colleges that required humanities classes, right?
ViscountPenguin•10m ago
I've yet to see any strong evidence that powerful people with humanities degrees do anything useful either.
hardbass•22m ago
See for example 'philosophers' of consciousness who can't do thermodynamics, turing computability and information theory. One would expect these three fields are the basic and inexhaustive baseline requirements to put any theory on consciousness.