frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The baffling intelligence of a single cell (2024)

https://jsomers.net/e-coli-chemotaxis/
116•jsomers•1d ago•4 comments

OpenAI algorithm for the FFT is less a breakthrough and more a malicious exploit

https://www.argmin.net/p/faster-fourier-transforms
21•mochomocha•1h ago•4 comments

GLM-Legal

https://z.ai/blog/glm-legal
473•ilreb•11h ago•266 comments

A Modern Web App in C

https://prophitt.me/writing/a-modern-web-app-in-c
434•prophittcorey•11h ago•177 comments

Intel D270 GPU AI Accelerator–Up to 480 GB LPDDR5X

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/discrete-gpus/data-center-gpu/d-series.html
103•hurricanepootis•6h ago•44 comments

Who is vfmaddrnd231pd?

https://purplesyringa.moe/blog/who-is-vfmaddrnd231pd/
134•pngmangi•6h ago•15 comments

China Overtakes U.S. For First Time as Top Spender on R&D in 2024

https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/science-nature/science/20260908-347742/
59•mushstory•1h ago•42 comments

Hackers activate automatic defrosting in supermarket fridges across Europe

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/unprecedented-cyberattack-cripples-supe...
497•Zeekaas•15h ago•693 comments

Janas: Run LLMs larger than RAM by streaming experts from SSD

https://github.com/prabanta-dev/janas
61•khalidkhair•5h ago•25 comments

Auto Research: Integer multiplication below n log n

https://app.getsupers.com/auto-research
30•swesnow•1d ago•6 comments

Making big downloads resumable in Firefox

https://lunarwatcher.codeberg.page/til/firefox/resumable-big-downloads.html
119•speckx•8h ago•43 comments

AI Models Can Provably Hide Arbitrary Capabilities

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13928
14•sbulaev•1h ago•1 comments

Turn a WiFi 7 Router into a 320Msps Software Defined Radio Receiver

https://github.com/h0m3us3r/w1700k-sdr
290•djfergus•15h ago•77 comments

Launch HN: Agent37 (YC F26) – Low-cost agent sandboxes for running agents

120•vishnukool•11h ago•79 comments

Phreak.ing – Internet Phone Switch

https://phreak.ing/
92•rickcarlino•6h ago•27 comments

Writing a Demoscene Intro for the ZX Spectrum

https://www.markround.com/blog/2026/zx-spectrum-intro
92•zdw•8h ago•10 comments

Citroen revives the 2CV for an electric age

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c620r33plgppo
278•scrlk•15h ago•326 comments

NAZA: Netanyahu orders identification and prosecution of film's interviewees

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/oct/12/naza-netanyahu-orders-identification-prosecution-int...
37•hebelehubele•57m ago•2 comments

Solar panels that plug into your wall

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/balcony-plug-in-solar-panels-renewable-energy
142•speckx•13h ago•130 comments

Blood cells from 80-year-old donor become stem cells with molecular age under 20

https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70751
118•arunc•4h ago•74 comments

Secret of Orange Cats Revealed After 60-Year Search

https://www.sciencealert.com/secret-of-orange-cats-finally-revealed-after-60-year-search
245•bookofjoe•2d ago•177 comments

Codex CLI installs a persistent, self-updating background daemon by default

https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/48195
490•whimblepop•9h ago•253 comments

The Making Of Super Mario 64 – full Giles Goddard interview (2001)

https://pixelatron.com/blog/the-making-of-super-mario-64-full-giles-goddard-interview-ngc/
235•gregsadetsky•2d ago•88 comments

Show HN: Brickbrag – A multiplayer brick-building world in the browser

https://brickbrag.com/
41•neuling•6h ago•13 comments

Kevin Kelly's 2016 AI Predictions, 10 Years Later

https://taylor.town/kk-ai-2026
154•surprisetalk•12h ago•51 comments

Show HN: An experimental pattern-first DAW that supports MCP

https://github.com/andrewfader/blokkily
27•androsynth89•4h ago•15 comments

Leaving Tech

https://ryanbigg.com/2026/10/leaving-tech
114•jonahx•1h ago•91 comments

Muse Wonder

https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wonder
558•meetpateltech•11h ago•308 comments

AI is a tool and using it well takes skill

https://yyhh.org/blog/2026/10/ai-is-a-tool/
269•layer8•6h ago•228 comments

Show HN: Atticus – Hold-to-talk voice assistant for macOS that runs on Claude -p

https://github.com/SaarthurR/atticus-mac
83•SaarthRanka•1d ago•13 comments
Open in hackernews

China Overtakes U.S. For First Time as Top Spender on R&D in 2024

https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/science-nature/science/20260908-347742/
57•mushstory•1h ago

Comments

excannuk•49m ago
And increasingly so. R&D requires excess wealth, the US has a structural deficit it cannot plug growing faster than inflation.
yahthatsart•40m ago
The way the US is aggressively footgunning itself, while China (and others) win by default is so frustrating. The US could have invested in clean energy, in social programs to help towns experiencing economic depression.

Like, it's really not that hard. Yes, we'd have to squeeze the richest people and share a little more equally. But not even that much. Like, the rich would still be astonishingly wealthy.

It's just... devastating to see oligarchs who can't just accept being slightly less oligarchic resulting in the collapse of an entire country.

lukeify•33m ago
Political polarisation is also at a point where it's become sports team-esque. People are willing to go to further extremes to dunk on the other side, even if it means the stadium is becoming increasingly messy.
bruce511•29m ago
It's easy to blame the rich here. And certainly they are the ones doing the damage and reaping the rewards.

But a third of Americans approve of the current administration. Around half of the people who voted, voted for this administration. And a lot of the footguns you refer to were gleefully part of the campaign.

If you want to apportion blame you might include moderate voters who may not approve of the status quo, but alas are so partisan that they cannot vote for the other side.

With more elections imminent, it remains to be seen if it's really the oligarchs fault, or if the root fault is the real source of power.

knowaveragejoe•19m ago
It's less a masterstroke of the rich, and more the media environment the various voter blocs you mentioned are soaking their minds in 24/7
StilesCrisis•6m ago
That media environment was in fact the masterstroke.
bradthebeaverfa•18m ago
Social programs are the polar opposite of how the US should be spending its money if it wants to outcompete China. Social programs both reduce the incentive for Americans to work while also depriving research/infrastructure projects of funding.
kelseyfrog•11m ago
That is why China is losing to the US. China massively more social programs than the US and it has reduced their economy to shambles because no one has incentive.
Buttons840•11m ago
Doesn't China have better social programs? They have universal healthcare.
bradthebeaverfa•5m ago
No? Chinese people have to work 6 days a week for a lower quality of living than a minimum wage American.
jpgvm•9m ago
Pretty much everywhere has proved that ensuring people have a place to shelter and eat doesn't stop them from wanting to do something with their lives. It's the oldest and most wrong talking point from this debate.
Buttons840•8m ago
If it is about "incentivizing people to work" and getting warm butts in chairs or out swinging hammers... well, how are we going to compete with a country that has 4x the number of warm bodies?

We can't compete with China via the number of people we have working.

We need to build a functioning society instead of a group of rugged individual capitalists who only come together when we need to help out the wealthy with a bail out or tax break.

Buttons840•17m ago
The oligarchs don't care. If they can make a buck ruining the US, they will, and then they'll move to another country whenever it's convenient for them and do it all again. Borders don't really exist for them.
jimbokun•9m ago
Our current President first and foremost among them.
rgbrenner•9m ago
and yet the oversupply of investment funds looking for projects created the current AI boom here in America, not China.

China “leads” but only in iterating on things already invented.

but we never ask what’s wrong with china that they spend so much on r&d but fail to invent novel things.

zetazzed•37m ago
I'm ready to blame the current admin, federal funding cuts, and cuts to immigration, but we all do need to check that the year for this change is clearly 2024... (But I am also ready to be even more depressed by 2025 stats!)
gyomu•31m ago
If China is to the 21st century what the US were to the 20th century - economically, scientifically, industrially - what should I do as a US citizen working in tech, besides signing up my kids and myself for Chinese classes?
rr808•28m ago
That's the problem right. Learning Chinese wont help you, China is a closed shop, no immigrants, no sharing work with anyone outside the country, no employing people outside China, no cooperation with any other country really; just keep buying their stuff.
JimTheMan•25m ago
I mean, have you worked with the Chinese? They're not like that at all.

They love money so much, you could swear they're American!

minraws•21m ago
Everyone loves money but socially and culturally China is a lot more closed compared to US, much more so than what people are used to atleast.

US was arguably the most open country on the planet in terms of acceptance of ideas and cultural diversity especially in 20th century.

But I also don't think people need to be very worried but still we haven't had monocultures on the top or close to the top of power hierarchy for several decades so it's going to be uncomfortable for a lot of people.

For instance China is heavily censorious of LGBTQ and very likely against the Idea they haven't banned it outright yet thankfully. But then again lots of countries are in a similar boat.

But the biggest difference is China can easily back slide without possiblity of return on any metric because it's not a democracy.

bruce511•
martythemaniak•29m ago
Assuming the expected thing happens and Trump gets shellacked in the midterms, do Americans think this will have some impact (ie reverse or accelerate) the current trend of cuts to science, cracking down on foreign students, cuts to NIH, HHS etc? Those being big recent change in this area.
bruce511•24m ago
I'm not American, but since those things are being done by the executive branch, with the approval of the Supreme Court, I'm not sure changes in congress will make much of a difference.

Short of impeachment (reasons for which are not in short supply, but which seems unlikely) there's not much congress can actually do to change things. 60 votes is a tough threshold to reach.

davidw•24m ago
It might stop the bleeding, but it won't repair the damage, is how I think of it.

I'm 50, and I am thinking basically "the rest of my life" is what it will take to start fixing some of this stuff, if it's even possible.

glimshe•20m ago
Even in the worst case scenario for Trump, the Democrats won't have a veto-proof majority. Trump will need to negotiate much harder and make concessions, but will largely keep doing what he was elected to do.

Also, the current projections don't point to a major Democrat victory. On average, midterms flip 27 seats. This midterm will likely flip 20-25 seats: a clear victory, but below average. A major victory would be like the 2010 against Obama (almost 70 seats flipped).

jimbokun•7m ago
jdw64•28m ago
It's true that China is remarkable, but the concern is that China is too large. Basically, these cutting-edge industries require industrial chains to be connected across different countries, but China can do almost everything within its own borders. China's greatness is greatness, but if China becomes highly developed, will this kind of technological development spread to neighboring countries?

U.S. industry, for one, spreads to many countries through outsourcing. But China can consume outsourcing within its own borders. If that happens, what will become of it?

satvikpendem•15m ago
I don't understand the complaint, China will just continue progressing while the rest of the world falls behind. It'd be the same as it has always been in Chinese history, in terms of isolationism.
Daishiman•6m ago
It's amazing how people think this is true when by every known metric, people who are given a minimally comfortable life almost always end up being far more productive members of society than those who are not.
csnover•4m ago
Social programs to help towns experiencing economic depression would inject money, training, education, etc. which would create opportunity for new growth and development in areas with a low cost of living. When people are too busy just trying to survive, they are not going to be working on inventing the next big thing, and they certainly are not going to support tax dollars going toward investments for tomorrow.
11m ago
"Was" being the operative word there. It's been a long time since new (foreign) ideas were accepted, and the resistance to cultural change has been ever present.

American culture is capitalism, and that isn't changing, just getting more extreme. Equally American culture is "white European" and the resistance to change there (racially and culturally) is woven into US history.

xqcgrek2•22m ago
Neither. Align yourself with the AI that will be running the show and hope it adequately feeds you.
bilbo0s•17m ago
This is the real answer.

But noone is gonna want to hear it.

k12sosse•11m ago
Move to a cabin in the woodlands and teach them how to work on engines, and animal husbandry.
He will continue to ignore Congress and the current laws on the books, probing the limits of what the Supreme Court will allow him to get away with.

He hasn’t bothered to work with a Republican Congress to pass laws. He certainly won’t bother with a Democratic or split Congress.

bradthebeaverfa•7m ago
Democrats winning the midterms would moderately accelerate this. They won't have a veto-proof majority so they won't be able to enact any of their policies; however, they will be able to prevent Trump from making any improvements. They have shown countless times that harming Trump is more important to them than the good of the country (ex: they're openly cheering for Iran), so you can bet they will have no interest in advancing any sort of new research that has Republican support.