How is it working for you in Garmin for sleep tracking? I tried it a few years ago and loved it at first, but then noticed how incorrect sleep data was.
It's been working great. The Claude morning brief compares my sleep, HRV, training status, calendar, and weather and then tells me when and how hard to workout that day.
See also: the OG App : https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/27/og-app-promises-you-an-ad-...
This is why I don't understand why MCPs (or in other words open documented APIs right?) are being pushed so much.
What's the value in e.g. Amazon opening up their APIs to competitors, lowering the cost of scraping their data? Or allowing their consumers to more easily analyze dynamic pricing? Isn't the whole point to steer people towards closed proprietary apps that work in walled garden that prevent reverse-engineering and any kind of modification?
Not a great example considering how easy it is to get Amazon data from both official and unofficial APIs (which is very cheap at scale)
Its funny because I literally just used it, opened HN, then saw this post
The web and mobile based workout builder has a terrible UI if your workout changes between sessions so I've lifted some features from an app called liftosaur and got it to send activities to my watch. Unfortunately Garmin don't seem to care very much about strength training, so are missing a lot of pretty key exercises from their list, with no ability to create custom ones
For example, if you want to track your maintenance calories (TDEE, total daily expenditure), Garmin isn't going to be much useful.
m463•1d ago
Honestly I've been wondering if in the near future I can basically have a big machine and some sort of "ingest" program.
Then keep connect my devices to it, where it will backup all the data, and mine the backups for information I want.
Mine my iphone backups for text messages or contacts
mine all my devices for photos or videos
mine my watch or bike computer or gps or whatever else for where I've been and how I've exercised.
instead, everyone wants your data and imposes themselves in the middle.
exabrial•1d ago
m463•1d ago
but a lot of these folks are uploading everything to garmin connect and letting it have your data and do the work.
jawilson2•18h ago
djantje•30m ago
gadders•27m ago
cgsmith•1d ago
zknill•1d ago
Strava (and I assume to some extent Garmin) apply some smoothing to these raw GPX traces to try and improve the path, or remove some of the noise.
You'd be missing out on this post-processing by taking the data raw. Ofc you can implement something similar yourself, but I wanted to point out that these platforms are doing a little bit more than just displaying the GPX trace.
szszrk•21m ago
I wander often on many smartwatch/sport tracking forums/subreddits, and it's fairly frequent that people ask how to deal with smoothing and get back raw data. Some love how Garmin smooths out a race track run for them and make gps trail stick perfectly to a lane. Some pull their hair out seeing their lake run being smoothed out to make it look like they jumped over fences and private properties.
I often find my garmin traces confusing as well, it's not objectively better.
kyzrfranz•27m ago
https://claude.ai/artifact/162zJUVejDdrAAw6yz9ETs
fyi - most of the functionality already working, but the key factor is how to get the data from the vendors.I currently rely on run-gap but i realise this is not a long-term solution. Last time i have checked intervals icu api I just couldn't stop throwing up for a few days -but this might be better in the mean time.
long term solution is to have something like rungap, server side without the ridiculous fees some of the vendors charge (terra, rook,...)
if anybody wants to test what I currently got, or just has some feedback - let me know.
gadders•12m ago
They charge an absolute fortune.
levocardia•9m ago