frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed

https://www.kimi.ai/blog/kimi-k3-1-pro
758•Jowsey•10h ago•469 comments

Evolving Threat: http2shell is an RCE in node, Python, and more

https://nitter.click/AikidoSecurity/status/2113759110625906950?__galadriel=lPmlGl9id4oAd5UeBwMhlY...
106•cowlevel•3h ago•53 comments

Apple Music 404 Not Found

https://music.apple.com/this-url-doesnt-exist
620•frizlab•14h ago•203 comments

Twelve Years of Distributed SQLite

https://philipotoole.com/twelve-years-of-distributed-sqlite/
16•otoolep•1h ago•0 comments

CVE Tracker

https://cve.0xosprey.com/
117•Group_B•5h ago•52 comments

Dessa: the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built

https://block.xyz/dessa
271•dsr12•7h ago•111 comments

Local Wikipedia: Wikipedia, but only for things a half hour walk from you

https://edjefferson.com/localwiki/
1279•sohkamyung•1d ago•226 comments

Today, we hacked what we'd set out to hack: the iPhone

https://blog.calif.io/p/iphone
770•pavel_lishin•10h ago•520 comments

Bringing uv and ty together

https://astral.sh/blog/uv-ty-integration
42•Ravencentric•3d ago•12 comments

The Real Kevin Bacon

https://pudding.cool/2026/10/kevin-bacon/
257•xnx•3d ago•72 comments

Canadians are running out of time to oppose Bill C-22

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/10/canadians-are-running-out-time-oppose-dangerous-c-22-survei...
346•hn_acker•1d ago•180 comments

C vs. C#: racing VLC's Gaussian blur

https://martinfinkel.com/blog/gaussian-blur-c-vs-csharp/
25•martz•2d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer

https://corgi.computer/
46•eiopa•7h ago•8 comments

Now Google says it might use your Gmail and Google Photos data to target ads

https://www.theverge.com/tech/1017600/google-personal-intelligence-privacy-policy-ads-update
301•JustSkyfall•7h ago•159 comments

The past, present, and future share a show floor at Pinball Expo 2026

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/10/the-past-present-and-future-share-a-show-floor-at-pinball-...
9•civicpivot•2d ago•1 comments

A Bicycle Journey Across Brazil to Find a Vanishing Savanna

https://e360.yale.edu/features/2026-film-contest-second-place-cerrado
35•throwaway2037•2d ago•8 comments

Air Purifiers as White Noise Machines

https://www.jefftk.com/p/air-purifiers-as-white-noise-machines
78•luu•9h ago•99 comments

Alzheimer's breakthrough: 2 hrs of sleep restored without clearing brain plaques

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/10/261018084421.htm
27•amichail•1h ago•2 comments

Rise of collagen-eating microbes may help explain gaps in the fossil record

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/rise-of-collagen-eating-microbes-may-help-explain-gaps-in-the...
19•gmays•3d ago•0 comments

Rune 1.3: adds TypeScript, a Helix editor, Kitty graphics and OSC-7501

https://rune.build/blog/rune-1-3-release
41•ernestrc•7h ago•9 comments

No Source Code? No Problem

https://queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/945131.945155
38•ibobev•6h ago•31 comments

A whirlwind tour of systemd-nspawn containers (2025)

https://quantum5.ca/2025/03/22/whirlwind-tour-of-systemd-nspawn-containers/
36•ibobev•6h ago•7 comments

Mark Zuckerberg Pushed Meta to Shield Him from California's Proposed Wealth Tax

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/21/technology/mark-zuckerberg-meta-california-wealth-tax.html
39•JKCalhoun•1h ago•43 comments

DNS: A Replacement for Finger

https://altchan.org/sh/42
30•Bender•8h ago•22 comments

Animations for System Builders

https://brooker.co.za/blog/2026/10/23/animations.html
43•KraftyOne•10h ago•3 comments

Securing our frontier model training environment

https://openai.com/index/securing-our-frontier-model-training-environment/
83•pretext•7h ago•98 comments

Reforming English Spelling

https://blog.oup.com/2026/10/reforming-english-spelling/
30•jruohonen•11h ago•88 comments

Show HN: Impossible Machines: declaratively program the physical world

https://www.impossiblemachines.xyz
69•bhaprayan•1d ago•17 comments

Show HN: Swurf – Swipe through the real web

https://swurf.org/
63•webtjb096•20h ago•29 comments

LISP Comes of Age (1980)

https://microship.com/lisp-comes-of-age/
63•so-cal-schemer•1d ago•17 comments
Open in hackernews

Mark Zuckerberg Pushed Meta to Shield Him from California's Proposed Wealth Tax

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/21/technology/mark-zuckerberg-meta-california-wealth-tax.html
39•JKCalhoun•1h ago

Comments

JKCalhoun•1h ago
https://archive.ph/2Dyp0
gnabgib•1h ago
Comments:

Guardian: Meta strikes deal with Zuckerberg to protect him from California wealth tax (39 points, 2 days ago, 33 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50193581

Wired: Mark Zuckerberg Agrees to Stay in California Despite Billionaires' Tax Measure (5 points, 2 days ago, 3 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50188801

Telegraph: Meta strikes deal to protect Zuckerberg from California billionaire tax (9 points, 2 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50191129

WSJ: Mark Zuckerberg Threatened to Leave California. Meta’s Board Cut Him a Deal (4 points, 2 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50193052 (30 points, 1 day ago, 40 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50199284

jprd•1h ago
I guess only pirate billionaires born on 3rd base can imagine being this craven and petty.

My man renamed the damn corp to "Meta" and proceeded to YOLO nearly triple digit billions USD on fire, shamelessly pivots to AI like all the other bros, while holding a solid majority of voting stock, and now we have to listen to him and his pals complain they might have to give something back.

Gross.

Handy-Man•1h ago
Well then, you haven’t really read what the situation is, have you?

He is going to pay, he just didn’t want to sell his normal shares, so he doesn’t lose his voting control. So instead, they are creating new class of shares that he can sell to pay the taxes.

winfredJa•1h ago
if they are creating new class of shares, are they giving him this extra money from shareholders?
bonsai_spool•55m ago
They did a stock split
ralph84•1h ago
If you don't like the stock don't buy it.
shimman•59m ago
What if society doesn't like the company? We should be able to destroy it.
triceratops•1h ago
Alternative headline: "Man asks for raise because his taxes went up"

FWIW I think this is better than avoiding the tax.

gexla•1h ago
Is this hyperbole? Or did you actually look into details? I'm curious about your understanding of what happened here. I believe this is an exchange of share types, but I could be mistaken.
triceratops•53m ago
They gave every shareholder a non-voting share for each share they own. Effectively a stock split. Zuck can sell his non-voting shares to pay the tax without losing control of the company.

In some sense Meta has doubled the voting power of Zuckerberg's shares. Previously he had X shares with 10X votes. Now he has 2X shares, can sell half of them for close to the market price, and still keep his 10X votes.

gexla•48m ago
Where did you get this information? We know how this works. This is a public company. This all happens in the open.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000162828026...

triceratops•46m ago
Your SEC link says the exact same thing.

"The board establishes a new Class C share type with no votes. It also announces a one-time dividend of a Class C share for each Class A and B share outstanding".

Please tell me what I got wrong.

aprilthird2021•1h ago
But they aren't "shielding" him really. They are just making it possible for him to pay the tax by selling shares in the company without giving up voting shares...

I mean maybe that is "shielding" but it's not like they are getting him out of paying the tax if it passes

idiotsecant•48m ago
The point of the law is to reduce the power of billionaires. Billionaires Using their power to change the rules and systemically avoid loss of power using a mechanisim available to literally nobody else is pretty much the antithesis of this idea.
triceratops•47m ago
I thought the point was to raise tax revenue from the people whose wealth increased the most.
rayiner•29m ago
The tax will probably raise negative revenue but that will be fine because revenue was never the point of it.
irishcoffee•45m ago
The point of the law was to generate money for the state to fund the same mistakes France and GB are currently reeling from. Reducing power had nothing to do with it.
Infernal•40m ago
Cui bono?
gexla•53m ago
We don't have to post hyperbole or speculation (there's social media for that.) This is a public company, we can read public documents such as...

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000162828026...

NOTE: Look for "Founder Alignment Agreement" in the above doc as an example if you're doing a quick scan.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000162828026...

https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-deta...

digitaltrees•53m ago
Public companies shouldn’t be allowed to have super majority shareholders that rule like a king.
CamperBob2•51m ago
If the stockholders are OK with it, who's to say otherwise?

I do think it would be a good idea to look at additional regulation regarding the public companies that pension and major index funds can invest in. I'm not crazy about being forced to own Musk properties just because I hold an S&P index, for example.

nothercastle•50m ago
They don’t have voting rights anyway. They are more like fans than stock holders
woopsn•43m ago
Yes since Zuck controls the board and negotiators he effectively dealt this outcome to himself, to large degree. Obviously "the shareholders" in a general sense have limited interest protecting the dual class structure.
limagnolia•35m ago
They can buy and sell the stock. If they weren't okay with it, they could not buy, or sell if they already own.
triceratops•48m ago
Shareholders are morons*. That's why the SEC was established in the first place.

*Source: am a moron.

minimaxa•52m ago
Not a big fan since we now only get 2 links a month,

But it would have been easier to relocate to the border in Tahoe than fill out mountains of paperwork; he lives on an estate in a Maui bunker anyway, not spoilt for housing options...

Not very good with building technology; he lost 80 billion on a nonexistent metaverse fail. Is that now a tax loss?

paaloeye•28m ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50217588
TacticalCoder•47m ago
I understand it's a move to keep his voting shares but... Why would the board care if the Zuck was to sell his big house in California? What was the threat to Meta/the board?
lotsofpulp•45m ago
The board doesn’t care. Zuckerberg has total control of Meta, so if he wants to increase his pay for whatever reason, he can.

That is all this is, a guy giving himself a pay increase, which almost everyone would if they could.

throwaway9876g•40m ago
He owns enough shares that there would be a significant change in the supply/demand ratio when California forces him to sell to meet his tax burden. That would tank the stock price because way too much supply when he tries to sell.

So basically meta stepped in to say they'd pay a portion of zucks tax burden to protect the supply/demand ratio of the stock, which protects the overall market price of Facebook stock and the valuation of the company as a whole.

Wealth taxes are inherently stupid in our modern financial system and this is a clear example of why.

whatisthiseven•29m ago
We tax houses every year, which is a wealth and land tax.

It isn't stupid. Multi hundred billionaires shouldn't exist. Then this wouldn't be a "problem".

throwaway9876g•23m ago
Yeah, the existence of billionaires is a problem. But then again, so is the existence of millionaires and thousandaires.

Honestly if any one has more than $999 the government should take it from them.

idiotsecant•51m ago
What if I don't like the human
rayiner•23m ago
“Born on third base.” You make him seem like minor nobility. His dad is a dentist and his mom is a psychiatrist. Kids with a background like that are a dime a dozen.
gexla•31m ago
You changed your post. You mentioned Levine. I don't know what else you changed. But Levine posted this in his article. I don't know where you're getting the part where he can sell half his shares.

"If Zuckerberg needs to pay taxes, he can sell his new zero-vote shares to raise money without diluting his voting rights. Not too many: He can “immediately sell or transfer up to 20% of the shares of Class C common stock that he receives in the Dividend, representing 10% of his overall economic stake in the Company, for any reason,” but the board “negotiated for and obtained Mr. Zuckerberg’s agreement that 80% of the shares of Class C common stock that he receives in the Dividend be subject to the Stapling Condition,” under which he can’t sell those no-vote shares without also selling some high-vote shares. The basic deal remains intact — he needs to own a meaningful chunk of shares to keep voting control — but there’s a liquidity buffer for taxes."

irishcoffee•35m ago
Squishing the budget deficit for 1 cycle in 2 years.
xboxnolifes•18m ago
No law is going to prevent billionaires overnight. At the stage we're in, any political change needs to aim for decades in the future.
wmf•30m ago
As a moron, are you allowed to decide that Zuck knows how to run Meta better than the shareholders?
nickff•28m ago
The SEC is very good at creating complexity, but has been terrible at protecting shareholders. The SEC has failed to detect and prosecute almost every massive fraud, including Madoff and Enron (despite being tipped off in both cases).
mayneack•30m ago
Why have any regulations for corporate governance?
bix6•29m ago
Who’s to say the stock holders are ok with it? See SpaceX as an example. Anybody with a brain who wasn’t in on the take wouldn’t accept those terms but they got forced on the general public anyways.
jdale27•10m ago
How do you imagine it working, this regulation whereby an index designed to track the 500 largest companies is required to exclude some of those just because they happen to be run by a guy you dislike?
bickfordb•26m ago
Your description of the scenario does not seem to be accurate. He is being gifted a new class of stock so that he does not need to relinquish control of the company for no apparent good reason. I'm indirectly a shareholder of this company through the major stock index inclusion, and I have not been similarly been gifted the same. I hope he pays his CA taxes fairly and as shareholders we are made whole by this chicanery.