frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: boringBar – a taskbar-style dock replacement for macOS

https://boringbar.app/
110•a-ve•1h ago•61 comments

Show HN: Oberon System 3 runs natively on Raspberry Pi 3 (with ready SD card)

https://github.com/rochus-keller/OberonSystem3Native/releases
112•Rochus•6h ago•14 comments

Show HN: Claudraband – Claude Code for the Power User

https://github.com/halfwhey/claudraband
15•halfwhey•2h ago•0 comments

Show HN: T4 – a versioned datastore with branching and time-travel (S3-backed)

https://github.com/t4db/t4
5•amakhov•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pardonned.com – A searchable database of US Pardons

476•vidluther•1d ago•259 comments

Show HN: ReverseYC

https://rocketplace.org/reverseyc
2•remarketme•5h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Formal – Formal verification for AI-generated code using Lean 4

https://github.com/yamafaktory/formal
4•yamafaktory•5h ago•4 comments

Show HN: ApplePy – Embed and Call Swift from Python (Like PyO3, but for Swift)

https://github.com/jagtesh/ApplePy
2•sheepscreek•5h ago•2 comments

Show HN: Telegram feed reader using DNS TXT records for Iran's Internet shutdown

https://github.com/sartoopjj/thefeed
2•znano•5h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Real-Time OLAP Infrastructure

https://modolap.com
4•ronfriedhaber•6h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Chunk – macOS menu bar time-blocking app with Claude AI integration

https://www.chunkapp.net
2•dudleyspence•6h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Bullseye2D – A Dart library for cross-platform 2D games

https://github.com/bullseye2d/bullseye2d
4•joemanaco•10h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Android AI agent-assistant operating your apps (no adb,PC,root,etc.)

2•sshnaidm1•7h ago•2 comments

Show HN: FluidCAD – Parametric CAD with JavaScript

https://fluidcad.io/
151•maouida•2d ago•36 comments

Show HN: Uncook, the Social Network for Food

https://uncook.xyz
3•moffers•7h ago•2 comments

Show HN: Minnow – minimal now pages via chat

https://minnow.social/
3•freshman_dev•7h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Toy Python Lisp interpreters based on the 1960 McCarthy paper

https://github.com/jhud/lisp
3•disconnection•9h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Waffle – Native macOS terminal that auto-tiles sessions into a grid

https://waffle.baby
36•olleeolleeollee•1d ago•11 comments

Show HN: A WYSIWYG word processor in Python

https://codeberg.org/chrisecker/miniword
84•chrisecker•2d ago•37 comments

Show HN: Eve – Managed OpenClaw for work

https://eve.new/login
69•zachdive•2d ago•38 comments

Show HN: A Better Internet

https://tomclancy.info/pages/abi-a-better-internet.html
9•tclancy•23h ago•3 comments

Show HN: macpak (Homebrew Wrapper for macOS)

https://github.com/kavindujayarathne/macpak
3•atkavindu•11h ago•2 comments

Show HN: I built a Cargo-like build tool for C/C++

https://github.com/randerson112/craft
171•randerson_112•3d ago•166 comments

Show HN: Marimo pair – Reactive Python notebooks as environments for agents

https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo-pair
138•manzt•5d ago•34 comments

Show HN: CSS Studio. Design by hand, code by agent

https://cssstudio.ai
169•SirHound•3d ago•106 comments

Show HN: Keeper – embedded secret store for Go (help me break it)

https://github.com/agberohq/keeper
63•babawere•2d ago•33 comments

Show HN: Minimalist template for scientific and academic resumes

https://github.com/pmichaillat/latex-cv
3•reomgdfsrtr•15h ago•2 comments

Show HN: Moon simulator game, ray-casting

https://mooncraft2000.com
114•JKCalhoun•6d ago•25 comments

Show HN: Druids – Build your own software factory

https://github.com/fulcrumresearch/druids
64•etherio•3d ago•15 comments

Show HN: Brutalist Concrete Laptop Stand (2024)

https://sam-burns.com/posts/concrete-laptop-stand/
786•sam-bee•5d ago•238 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: boringBar – a taskbar-style dock replacement for macOS

https://boringbar.app/
108•a-ve•1h ago
Hi HN!

I recently switched from a Fedora/GNOME laptop to a MacBook Air. My old setup served me well as a portable workstation, but I’ve started traveling more while working remotely and needed something with similar performance but better battery life. The main thing I missed was a simple taskbar that shows the windows in the current workspace instead of a Dock that mixes everything together.

I built boringBar so I would not have to use the Dock. It shows only the windows in the current Space, lets you switch Spaces by scrolling on the bar, and adds a desktop switcher so you can jump directly to any Space. You can also hide the system Dock, pin apps, preview windows with thumbnails, and launch apps from a searchable menu (I keep Spotlight disabled because for some reason it uses a lot of system resources on my machine).

I’ve been dogfooding it for a few months now, and it finally felt polished enough to share.

It’s for people who like macOS but want window management to feel a bit more like GNOME, Windows, or a traditional taskbar. It’s also for people like me who wanted an easier transition to macOS, especially now that Windows feels increasingly user-hostile.

I’d love feedback on the UX, bugs, and whether this solves the same Dock/Spaces pain for anyone else.

P.S. It might also appeal to people who feel nostalgic for the GNOME 2 desktop of yore. I started my Linux journey with it, and boringBar brings back some of that feeling for me.

Comments

johng•1h ago
Wow this looks really neat. I am going to have to give it a try.
mynameisvlad•1h ago
I use uBar for this: https://ubarapp.com but this looks like a nice lightweight alternative!
hmokiguess•1h ago
uBar looks amazing as well, and it’s not a subscription, I really like boringBar but can’t justify a subscription tho
starkparker•1h ago
https://lawand.io/taskbar/ as well

and https://noteifyapp.com/activedock/, which is less extreme but has a start menu-like launcher option

Both have one-time/lifetime purchase options. Taskbar is $25 one-time with a free but expiring older version. ActiveDock's one-time prices are $15 (1 year of updates, but usable forever) and $60 (lifetime updates).

PeanutOS•6m ago
Another alternative is https://hypercritical.co/switchglass/ ($10 upfront) really well done.
nguyenkien•1h ago
Both are under 10MB, So I don't think there would be much difference.
temp0826•1h ago
Looks great. Subscription? Big ol nope.
eric-p7•1h ago
Imagine paying a subscription for your task bar.
Contexting•1h ago
Was looking for this exact solution.
selfawareMammal•1h ago
Cant see how this app would fit into a subscription.
bradley_taunt•1h ago
Looks excellent but I can’t wrap my head around how this is a subscription. Pricing the app even at a higher range ($40-50), one—time payment makes way more sense.

You could even require paying for “upgrades” for major updates in the future. (Similar to that of Sketch or some apps made by Panic)

alsetmusic•1h ago
Wow, this looks very clean. I'm not the target audience, but if I was looking for a tool in this category, this would be highly attractive to me. Very subtle design that isn't distracting or busy. Well done!

Edit: Ok, feedback. Please know that I'm a junky for independent Mac apps that I find interesting. This is interesting to me.

This feedback is entirely meant to be constructive. I like the app so far and I want it to succeed. Also, as someone who is deeply familiar with the platform and the third-party software ecosystem, my hope is that I can help communicate the things that would make if feel intuitively correct to a majority of Mac users. What I mean is that I'm a nerd who thinks a lot about the platform and the choices devs make that are nuanced and subtle. I hope you find it useful.

1. Practically invisible on a background that's dark / black. The photo on my desktop background is black at the bottom and this thing is therefore invisible. I don't know the best way to address that. Maybe it should sample the colors behind it and default to a light mode at first launch?

2. Frosted glass only changed one tab / chip (the active focus one) and the rest remained black and invisible. Not sure if that's deliberate or not. I expected the whole thing to change. I do see that window thumbnails are now frosted (didn't try thumbnails before toggling).

3. Needs kbd nav. I hovered to get thumbnails and tried arrow keys. No effect.

4. Thumbnail selections would benefit from a border or other visual indicator. Having only traffic light window controls to show which is active isn't sufficient.

5. As I continue to poke around, disabling frosted glass to view thumbnails in dark mode didn't change the glass background for thumbnails. Again, I didn't check thumbnails before switching frosted glass on. I don't know if that's supposed to work that way or not. Seems wrong to me, but I don't know the intent.

6. Delay for hover to invoke tooltips or thumbnails is too long. It feels sluggish. However, the snappy responsive drawing of new content when sliding from one app's thumbnails to another is very nice and impressive. It'd be easy for that to suck, so well done.

7. Time opening / drawing the app menu after first click is too long. I have a bajillion (394) apps installed, might be why. Should be as fast as clicking the Apple Menu regardless of how many apps need to be listed. Wait, now I just clicked it again to check if it is faster after the first time. Looks like the app cached whatever info it had to pull the first time cause it's properly snappy. Maybe pre-fetch that info on first launch so it isn't slow on the first click.

8. The thumbnails for minimized browser windows are awesome! Much nicer than using the thumbnails from Dock windows / tiles. I like that so much that I would consider working this into my workflow despite not needing it otherwise. I probably wouldn't do so, but I like it a lot.

9. The desktop / spaces switcher should probably also have thumbnails showing the content of each space.

10. There should be a toggle that closes a window from the thumbnails. I see that right-click has an option to do so, but there should be a left-clickable toggle in one of the corners. I'm gonna go against typical MacOS idioms and recommend experimenting with putting that toggle at the bottom of the thumbnail because they're so tall relative to the taskbar height. It might be wrong when you test it out. It's one of those things that I think either it feels right or it doesn't. My first instinct, however, is that it ought to be in the upper-left corner.

At the end of the day, I like it. I'm not the target audience, as mentioned above. But I know there are a lots of people who are the intended audience and I want them to have nice tools. I hope this makes some people happy. I'd be happy to provide additional feedback on a future build if the above is considered useful. Email in profile. Fingers crossed this doesn't come off as critical of the app. I like honest and direct feedback and I hope I haven't bummed you out cause that's not at all the intent.

a-ve•7m ago
Wow - thank you so much for the feedback. Let me go through this.

1. That might be a good idea. Do you think adjusting the size of the bar from the settings makes it any better?

2. That seems like a bug. There's glass theme for Tahoe - but I think restarting boringBar might help here. I'll check it out.

3. Fair. I did not think of this use case.

4. Thumbnails have a blue hue for active windows as of now. Could you please let me know how this could work better?

5. Right now the Tahoe glass/frosted switch only works on the bar. A glass revamp is in the works for people who like the Liquid Glass design language.

6. I faced the opposite issue to this during my testing - the thumbnails opened up fairly quickly in my case. I'll take note of it and will fix it in later versions.

7. Correct - first time is slower because of the excessively large number of apps. I'll try to reproduce this.

9. Good idea. Will implement this as well.

10. If you hover on the thumbnail window the close and minimize buttons will show up. Are you talking about the ability to quit the app and all of its windows entirely?

sonofhans•1h ago
I am the target audience for this, from a UX and tech perspective. It addresses a problem I have and for which I periodically audition solutions.

A subscription for a menu bar, though, kills it for me. I have apps on Macs that are over 20 years old. Some of those companies don’t exist anymore. I’m not going to risk paying $100 for a decade of your app and hope that your company, or your goodwill, stays around that long.

cactusplant7374•1h ago
It's a tiny market. Why would they bother if only 10 people will give them $10?
SyneRyder•1h ago
Apparently not that tiny, if a competitor has the same product priced at $30 and is currently on to version 4 after 12+ years in business!
cactusplant7374•49m ago
They can set whatever price they want. And in business... for a micro saas? Is that just... waiting?
comboy•32m ago
I have the same bias as the parent. I'd rather pay $50 one time than $9 a year even if I throw it away after 4 years.

But the main reason I wouldn't install it despite being happy customizing linux is that it's yet another black box I need to trust and that knows way too much. It's really insane how much you need to compromise your security on macos to have a decent developer experience.

a-ve•55m ago
I think that’s a fair question.

My thinking is pretty simple: most people will probably choose the basic 2-device plan, which works out to about $0.85 per month. For an app like this, I think that is a reasonable price.

Another reason is that a lot of Mac apps charge a one-time fee upfront, but then require paid upgrades later. In practice, that often ends up being similar to paying for a few years of ongoing support anyway.

I also think a low-cost subscription sets a clearer expectation that the app will continue to be maintained and kept working as macOS changes. For software like this, where OS updates can easily break things, that felt like the more honest model.

a-ve•52m ago
Adding on to this, apps that hook into window management and multi-monitor behavior can break in subtle ways over time. I ran into some of that with uBar on my setup, especially around multi-monitor use and waking from sleep, and I wanted boringBar’s pricing to match the expectation of continued support and fixes.
theowaway213456•24m ago
I 100% understand why you are using a subscription-based model. It makes sense, and I agree it's the most honest model given that you have to continually support it and you don't want to have to either over-promise on extended support, and offer refunds if you can't fulfill that promise.

I just hate managing subscriptions.

If you gave me the option to require manual subscription renewal, rather than auto-renewal, I would 100% buy this right now. Basically allow me to purchase for 1 year then click a button to confirm that I'm still getting value out of the product. If I don't click that button then you should assume I'm no longer interested and cancel my subscription.

(I don't like using my mac but sometimes I have to use it for work, and I wish I had this.)

a-ve•22m ago
Fair point. The billing part of it is managed via Stripe - I'll put up the update/cancel subscription part on the Customer Billing panel soon.
oa335•1h ago
I would pay $10 one time for this; a subscription seems excessive to me.
dd8601fn•57m ago
100%. A subscription is instant death for this.

The good news is someone definitely will (or perhaps already has) done this without one.

nxpnsv•1h ago
I am using BoringNotch, which is great. Is this somehow related?
randomeel•21m ago
No , boring notch is a Dynamic Island like utility and it also hasn’t been updated since November , I suggest you to try out atoll which is a fork of it and pretty great .
APock•1h ago
Of coarse its a subscription...
SyneRyder•1h ago
While I don't use a Mac as my primary anymore, I'm surprised I like the look of this! It actually looks quite Mac-like as well.

Subscription is a big nope here, though. Especially for Mac software, I'd expect something where you pay for one major version, that is guaranteed to works on specific macOS versions, and gets minor bugfix updates too. But maybe the next macOS version requires a newer major version update to run, in which case you pay an upgrade fee to buy the next major version - or maybe the next major version has new features you might want to upgrade to as well.

My old Macs are stuck on 10.13, and I see Ubar mentioned elsewhere in this thread and that it's still compatible with 10.13. I might consider the $30 one off price to buy Ubar and keep it forever, but I wouldn't do a $10 subscription.

BoorishBears•45m ago
Please don't overindex on this comment OP, $10 a year is completely reasonable and the status quo they describe has killed so much software for so little benefit

It's a subscription with extra steps and worse retention.

18182939393939•18m ago
This reminds me of when I got my Vaxx subscription after the 5th booster.
einherjae•12m ago
Why not offer both?

I personally dislike subscriptions to the point where I’d gladly pay more to own, and as this thread shows, I’m not alone.

So why not offer both?

vunderba•12m ago
Agreed. The idea of having to pay for non-cloud based software in perpetuity forever, and having it stop working the very second I discontinue paying is a hard no for me.

OP, go with the JetBrains model. You can still offer a monthly subscription, but also provide an annual option where you pay up front for a year. After that year, it reverts to a fallback license for the specific version that was current during that period. It’s a good approach.

genbugenbu•1h ago
I love that you've made this, but in a world of never ending subscriptions, a subscription to a taskbar is just not something I (or many I imagine) can justify - no matter how low the price.

We really have entered the age of everything being a subscription.

blueaquilae•1h ago
Is there some more expensive tiers to change the color or do I need to pay a premium?
ssenssei•58m ago
it looks great, looks clean, seems like people want it.

nobody's paying a subscription for a taskbar. The business model here is a one time sale.

aftergibson•57m ago
Looks nice, I'm forced to use OSX at work, but it's a hard no for another subscription.
reacharavindh•56m ago
+1 to amplify the voice that hates a subscription to a taskbar. If it was €15 one time I would’ve instantly bought it.
amarant•56m ago
Ah, good old Apple, where for only $9.99 a month, you can experience what Linux offered for free 15+ years ago.
cosmic_cheese•31m ago
Not really true if what you want is a full macOS-style desktop experience with a few choice features from elsewhere bolted on. Linux desktops are predominantly Windows-style or minimal tiling thing, with the exceptions (GNOME, Pantheon) bearing only surface-level Mac aesthetics and being more comparable to superpowered tablet OS experiences.
gunapologist99•17m ago
MacOS is neutered for any advanced or even power user compared to practically any Linux desktop experience. Trying to just resize or remove a window should convince you of that instantly.
amarant•9m ago
Can you expand a bit on what you mean by "Superpowered tablet os"?

I'm tend to think of it as a server os with a DE, but as a backend developer I'm probably biased.

fii•55m ago
Subscription on something like this is goofy, and extra subscription per seat even for personal is goofier. For free, I can use Alfred/Raycast, Aerospace, and either sketchybar or zebar and have all this functionality executed even more skillfully and ergonomically. If you want to throw money into it, Alfred power pack is £34 and supports a great company with a lifetime purchase.

But I also understand I’m not the target audience for this, and some of my coworkers that wanted a Mac because “it’s a Mac” and now compare everything to Windows would probably use it. I’ll just have to feel bad for their wallets.

applfanboysbgon•53m ago
Remember when we bought software, and owned the right to use it in perpetuity? Good times those were. Now fucking taskbars are SaaS. There is no end to rent-seeking behaviour. In a decade or two, I suppose we will not only be renting the right to use our computers, but also the mouse and keyboard will be time-gated rentals as well. Mousewheel and numpad only available on the Pro subscription, of course.
thehamkercat•23m ago
They're milking the final drops, before LLMs become so good that they'll write something like this in an hour
harladsinsteden•51m ago
One-time fee? I would be onboard instantly. Monthly fee? For what exactly? There is no recurring cost like server space or anything else. Nope, you lost me as a customer. For good.
mikestew•49m ago
“$9.99/year”. <closes tab>

C’mon, man, there’s not even a backend to support. Want more revenue next year? Release a new version that’s a compelling upgrade.

cs02rm0•39m ago
I'm not the target market for a subscription for this, but I found it quite buggy - I had multiple browser windows open and couldn't navigate to more than one. I couldn't navigate to other spaces either (clicking on them did nothing) and scrolling through the apps menu was laggy.

The screenshots on the website look nice though.

jorl17•39m ago
Hi!

Over the years, I've tried several of these dock replacement apps. The one that stuck the longest was uBar (which I used with a setup similar to what you have here, emulating a "windows taskbar".

I've hit issues with most of them that forced me to move back to the normal Dock, but the number one issue has always been around notification badges: they always seemed to break in strange ways.

For example, can your dock show badges for iMessage if the app isn't open? Does it get the updated badge count without me opening it? Say I receive a SMS/iMessage, does it instantly show a counter next to the unopened pinned messages app? None of the other apps successfully did this when I tried them...

I don't know if there are other apps like this, but iMessage was by far the biggest offender. Perhaps system settings too?

P.S.: Congrats on the launch :)

P.P.S.: As others have said, I think a subscription for this will rub many people the wrong way (I am one of them). If I'm paying for a subscription, I expect this to be pretty bug-free and have at least monthly updates. I wouldn't ask this of other subscription-based apps, but for one that replaces a system-level component and wants me to keep paying, you bet I am holding it to a high standard! I've wasted too much money on other replacements and gotten very little value out of that.

a-ve•23m ago
Hi there — I ran into the same issue myself, but sadly I still haven't found a way to show the badge count without opening the app. I'm still experimenting with it.

I expected some pushback on subscriptions, but after trying uBar and running into quite a few issues with it I wanted to build something that feels reliable and polished. I’m pretty much all-in on the Apple ecosystem now, even though I only switched ~6 months ago. My intention is to keep supporting boringBar regularly, as I use it every day myself.

ike____________•38m ago
Take a look to Jotego's (mister FPGA) business model. I was the main maintainer of a distro so I can say that That's not going to work. Also I'm in love with your style.
vivid242•24m ago
I‘d be happy to pay for an upgrade if future macOS changes break the functionality of this - cool - app, which would require the creator to update it. More work, which I would pay for. But not a subscription, sorry!

Plus, I‘d prefer to (but that’s impossible?) install via the App Store, to avoid a black box.

randomeel•23m ago
There are MORE apps that have a better reputation like sidebar , dock fix , active dock (has been around for years and years) , and a subscription does not make sense since most can be done for free like window previews with dock door , group windows by app is free in desktop and dock settings for Mission Control , the native dock can also do many things like notification badges, click to show desktop or use a hot corner or trackpad gesture , pin apps in the dock , there are a billion app launchers , spotlight is built in . Most people will stay away from subscriptions as I have observed in the comment below (Pls be nice I’m new here and I don’t know how to comment properly )
throwanem•21m ago
Show me a side-dockable vertical taskbar, circa Win XP thru 7 style - and a lifetime license for 10 years' worth of the subscription, which you may no longer even support by then - and you will have closed a sale.
vswaroop04•15m ago
Subscription ? Big No
interstice•13m ago
I'll be trying this! I used uBar for a long time, and more recently taskbar as uBar was too buggy to ignore. My main issue with Taskbar currently is that it sits over non windowed fullscreen apps (eg Steam games). Other than that I prefer the design on yours based on a quick look through the page.
ricardobeat•6m ago
> I built boringBar so I would not have to use the Dock

Does anybody really use the dock as a an app switcher? MacOS is built around shortcuts, alt-tab, show spaces, etc. The dock is there for starting apps – which you can also do via spotlight, and as a “favorites” list after you remove all the built-ins.

superjared•4m ago
Just adding to the pile to say that the subscription kills it for me.
neuropacabra•4m ago
Gnome 2 anyone?