Doesn't seem to be a lot of options for self-hosted/open-core project management software. The existing ones looks pretty bad, and don't come anywhere close to Jira level functionality.
In my experience that's probably a good thing. I've moved from a company using Phabricator to one using Jira. Phabricator had exactly everything we needed and was very nicely designed and worked really nicely.
Jira has everything you need plus loads of other stuff that project managers feel like they need to add. Oh and they'll never clear anything up or fix any config bugs because they don't actually have to ever use the "report bug" form so who cares if there are 100 fields and half of the mandatory ones are hidden in "More fields"? 5 different states for "TODO"? Eh who cares. 3 different ways to say which team a bug is in? Better fill them all in for every bug.
It's better to be missing features than to have features that project managers can configure.
(obviously lacks really fine-grain customization that would be found in other jira alternatives)
https://www.atlassian.com/enterprise/data-center
They also offer Government Cloud.
Edit: I looked again and even your pricing pages have no price. I understand that you may want to restrict yourself to rich companies, but I don't understand the point of posting on HN if that's the case.
That being said, we don't recommend the air-gapped version for personal use. Instead, you can use our open-source Community Edition here: https://github.com/makeplane/plane — you can self-host it and disable telemetry entirely.
If they said "implement a backdoor for us or all your non-airgapped customers lose access tomorrow", are you sure the company would be able and willing to say no?
This includes Projects + Wiki. More here: https://docs.plane.so/core-concepts/pages/wiki
Here's a blog on how you can switch between products within Plane, https://plane.so/blog/introducing-apprail-plane-new-navigati...
This is an AI writing tell: "It's not just x—it's y."
Know who else uses punctuation? People who write. In fact, that's where the AI got the idea.
(Your regular annoying notice that FIPS-compliant crypto is, if anything, marginally less secure than non-FIPS crypto; not that it matters in any material way, just, it's not a flex.)
It has support for spaces, real-time collaboration, a rich-text editor, built-in diagrams support and more.
We launched on HN 1 year ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40832146
There are no communication cables between the host system and the wider world.
* air-gap malware can be designed to communicate secure information acoustically, at frequencies near or beyond the limit of human hearing.
* In 2014, researchers introduced ″AirHopper″, a bifurcated attack pattern showing the feasibility of data exfiltration from an isolated computer to a nearby mobile phone, using FM frequency signals.
* In 2015, "HELLONE", a covert signaling channel between air-gapped computers using thermal manipulations, was introduced. "BitWhisper" supports bidirectional communication and requires no additional dedicated peripheral hardware.
* Later in 2015, researchers introduced "GSMem", a method for exfiltrating data from air-gapped computers over cellular frequencies. The transmission - generated by a standard internal bus - renders the computer into a small cellular transmitter antenna.
viharkurama•6h ago
The interesting part: our air-gapped deployment actually runs faster than our SaaS version. Turns out when you eliminate all network latency, things get snappy.
This post covers the technical challenges we solved (supply chain trust, 2GB bundle size, offline licensing) and why regulated industries need alternatives to cloud-only tools like Jira.
vosper•5h ago
But Jira is not cloud-only?
https://www.atlassian.com/enterprise/data-center
magicalhippo•4h ago
In any case it was clear it's not for small shops like us.
That said, air-gapped is a hefty requirement, so perhaps those customers are predominantly large?
viharkurama•4h ago
magicalhippo•4h ago
We do the similar with our B2B product (in an entirely different niche). We have everything from single-person companies up to very large ones. Similarly we set price based on use-case and requirements.
bpt3•4h ago
$51k for the smallest license they offer.
I still run an old version on an air gapped network and will continue to do so until we're forced to change for some reason. It's not a hefty requirement; we run it for a team of < 10 developers on a small VM and it just works.
magicalhippo•4h ago
bigfatkitten•3h ago
There are lots of very small classified networks out there with only a few dozen users.
There are a lot more user communities course that aren’t necessarily airgapped, but where they have special compliance requirements that pretty much mandate self hosting (or at least bring-your-own cloud.)
jasondc•4h ago
bpt3•4h ago
To be more specific, they killed off the legacy Jira Server and now only offer these enterprise versions of Jira and the rest of the suite if you won't move to the cloud.
thaack•4h ago
magicalhippo•4h ago
Same experience with JIRA. I read all these negative comments here and elsewhere about how slow and clunky JIRA was, and I couldn't relate at all.
Then I realized all those who complained was using JIRA Cloud and we were using on-prem, and it all made sense.
We've since moved to JIRA Cloud ourselves, and I understand now.
We moved and none of the new places had any viable computer room, so literally had to put the rack in a closet And well, that ain't cutting it for physical access control these days. Thankfully we have very simple flows without any BS, so not too many 1-5 second clicks to get things done.
IshKebab•4h ago
Even Atlassian doesn't use Jira cloud. Btw it's not "JIRA".
magicalhippo•4h ago
That would explain a lot.
> Btw it's not "JIRA".
When did they change this? I'm fairly certain[1] it used to be JIRA.
[1]: https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira061
eastbound•4h ago
joeldo•4h ago
tomrod•2h ago
JIRA stands for JIRA Isn't Really Awesome.
mikestaas•2h ago
tomrod•2h ago
michaelt•1h ago
1. Unless major customers are actively closing their accounts due to the poor performance, improving performance isn't a priority.
2. The people who pay for it aren't the people who use it, so the performance can get very, very bad before customers start closing their accounts.
uxp100•4h ago
tikkabhuna•3h ago
nitwit005•2h ago
Usually with these tools, the performance problems magically vanish if you disable all the integrations people have set up. My company is constantly denial of service attacking Jira with Github updates, for example.
Edit: typo
makeitdouble•1h ago
Also big enough corps give underpowered machines to the mass of employees (anyone not a dev, designer or lead of something) so latency is just life to them.
zelphirkalt•4h ago
mschuster91•3h ago
Jira on-prem was dog slow, yes, especially if it didn't live on the same server as the database. But Jira Cloud? It isn't much faster than that! It's a piece of hot mess. Loading placeholders everywhere. Really I have absolutely zero idea what Atlassian is doing, but I know for sure optimizing for performance is not amongst the things they are doing.
echelon•2h ago
The dialogues and context menus took forever to show and page navigation was beyond painful.
We had dedicated engineering for maintaining our Jira and Bitbucket, and they still fell over. We eventually moved back to GitHub. (Our usage went from GitHub on-prem pre-MS -> Bitbucket on-prem -> GitHub cloud post-MS.)
I hate Jira regardless of where it's deployed. It's a beast.
firesteelrain•1h ago
Well except Bamboo. It’s terrible
time0ut•1h ago
jeron•4h ago
Notion, take notes
yodon•4h ago
viharkurama•4h ago
Msurrow•4h ago
bobmcnamara•3h ago
Feds are DMCA immune, so no real recourse.
bigfatkitten•3h ago
bobmcnamara•1h ago
atonse•3h ago
Usually you do have recourse via procurement channels and reps. If you file a complaint with that agency stating that they’re using a license without paying for it, it will result in at least an investigation.
michaelt•1h ago
I wouldn't. I'd hire some Peter Gibbons type, who only does about 15 minutes of real, actual work in a typical week. Then I'd tell them they can finish early if all their pending cases are closed.
bobmcnamara•1h ago
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2008/08/air-force-cracks...
bobmcnamara•1h ago
Hopefully this was fixed, but this was the standing precedent at the time.
unethical_ban•35m ago
fc417fc802•2h ago
> probably be much cheaper than building and maintaining an air-gapped licence solution
I think this is an unwise attitude to take. There's something to be said for a simple picket fence. Even though someone could easily hop it if they wanted to, they lose plausible deniability and in most cases that's all that really matters at the end of the day.
unixhero•2h ago
isatty•1h ago
This is the least surprising thing I’ve read all day.