https://archive.org/details/radio_electronics_1985-05/page/n...
Transactor Magazine volume 7, issue 4 (1987 ) had an article on interfacing it to a C64:
https://archive.org/details/transactor-magazines-v7-i04/mode...
https://colorcomputerarchive.com/repo/Documents/Magazines/Ho...
>By moving the joystick (a mechanical linkage), you select one of a series of rotating cams that connect a gear to the power shaft. This is probably the worst design possible for modification to electronic control.
At the time I was disappointed that it didn't use (non-existing) motors already in the Armatron but looking back at it with an understanding of the mechanical design, it's easy to see why they went with that decision. The only other choice would have been to connect to the joysticks themselves. The added motors probably improved the operation quite a bit.
It was like the sound of a pile of silverware dumped into a garbage disposal played at full volume over an AM radio.
Great controls, though.
> “I didn’t have a period where I studied engineering professionally. Instead, I enrolled in what Japan would call a technical high school that trains technical engineers, and I actually [entered] the electrical department there,” he told me.
I think this approach is sorely needed again, in the US at least.
I did go to study CS after high school (despite getting a job midway through my senior year), but I still draw on the things I learned in high school every day. It was great. Gave me a lot of practical foundations.
This toy probably equally inspired kids to go into robotics, or to design automotive transmissions.
brudgers•1d ago