This is built on Godot: https://godotengine.org/showcase/rpg-in-a-box/

Seeing stuff like this makes me so excited! Partly because I love game engines and making games, and partly because it becomes more evidence to me that programmers will really like my project when I finally release it! Hopefully next Monday!

Related:

RPG in a Box: A grid-based, voxel-style game engine built on Godot - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37502218 - Sept 2023 (21 comments)

They should take advantage of viral marketing: "I heard you like game engines, so here's a game engine in a game engine."

I wonder how it compares to RPGMaker.

My first thought on seeing the RPG in a Box homepage is that the graphics don't really do anything for me. Maybe it's just nostalgia having grown up playing Final Fantasy games for SNES, but when it comes to graphically simple games, I find that pixel art graphics resonate much more with me. So I would probably lean more toward RPG maker if I wanted to make an RPG.

But then I had a look at the community showcase [1], and it's really impressive what people are doing. I've played a lot of Minecraft, and have experienced genuine awe and terror in those environments. And some of the community showcase screenshots definitely give me that same immersive feeling that I get in Minecraft, and which pixel art games don't really offer.

So I guess my advice is to maybe highlight more of the community creations on the homepage as well as first-person worlds.

Anyway, any tool that encourages and enables creativity is awesome. This is very cool!

Edit: Just had a look in the forums and it looks like you can do pixel art games in this engine, too. [2]

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/rpginabox/comments/1hqx3h4/im_so_gr...

[2] https://rpginabox.com/forum/d/547-the-twilight-isle/8

Five megabytes for the acorn64 rotating box, because it’s a GIF. And a bad GIF that can’t play at its intended speed for most of its rotation, and so has speed jitters (without delving: I presume it’s due to format limitations, as it looks to be using more than 256 colours; see also https://www.biphelps.com/blog/The-Fastest-GIF-Does-Not-Exist). Ugh. `ffmpeg -i acorn64.gif acorn64.mp4` shrinks it to under 350kB, looking about the same except that it now plays smoothly. And will use a lot less power.

(I noticed this because the page was loading unreasonably slowly for unclear reasons. In cases like this, a GIF <img> has a worse failure mode than <video>.)