frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

ETH Zurich and EPFL to release a LLM developed on public infrastructure

https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2025/07/a-language-model-built-for-the-public-good.html
216•andy99•3h ago•29 comments

jank is C++

https://jank-lang.org/blog/2025-07-11-jank-is-cpp/
140•Jeaye•4h ago•45 comments

OpenAI's Windsurf deal is off – and its CEO is going to Google

https://www.theverge.com/openai/705999/google-windsurf-ceo-openai
52•rcchen•22m ago•16 comments

Upgrading an M4 Pro Mac mini's storage for half the price

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2025/upgrading-m4-pro-mac-minis-storage-half-price
256•speckx•7h ago•161 comments

Andrew Ng: Building Faster with AI [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNJCfif1dPY
114•sandslash•1d ago•31 comments

Bill Atkinson's psychedelic user interface

https://patternproject.substack.com/p/from-the-mac-to-the-mystical-bill
336•cainxinth•10h ago•181 comments

Astronomers race to study interstellar interloper

https://www.science.org/content/article/astronomers-race-study-interstellar-interloper
82•bikenaga•6h ago•42 comments

Activeloop (YC S18) Is Hiring AI Search and Python Back End Engineers(Onsite,MV)

https://careers.activeloop.ai/
1•davidbuniat•56m ago

Show HN: RULER – Easily apply RL to any agent

https://openpipe.ai/blog/ruler
32•kcorbitt•4h ago•4 comments

Lead pigment in turmeric is the culprit in a global poisoning mystery (2024)

https://www.npr.org/sections/goats-and-soda/2024/09/23/nx-s1-5011028/detectives-mystery-lead-poisoning-new-york-bangladesh
253•perihelions•6h ago•126 comments

Repaste Your MacBook

https://christianselig.com/2025/07/repaste-macbook/
136•speckx•9h ago•85 comments

Pa. House passes 'click-to-cancel' subscription bills

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2025/07/pa-house-passes-click-to-cancel-subscription-bills-as-court-throws-out-federal-rule.html
171•bikenaga•5h ago•60 comments

I'm more proud of these 128 kilobytes than anything I've built since

https://medium.com/@mikehall314/im-more-proud-of-these-128-kilobytes-than-anything-i-ve-built-since-53706cfbdc18
66•mikehall314•2h ago•18 comments

At Least 13 People Died by Suicide Amid U.K. Post Office Scandal, Report Says

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/10/world/europe/uk-post-office-scandal-report.html
498•xbryanx•10h ago•428 comments

In a First, Solar Was Europe's Biggest Source of Power Last Month

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/solar-biggest-power-source-europe-june-2025
157•Brajeshwar•5h ago•92 comments

Monorail – Turn CSS animations into interactive SVG graphs

https://muffinman.io/monorail/
16•stanko•3d ago•2 comments

Air India Flight 171 Accident Preliminary Report [pdf]

https://aaib.gov.in/What%27s%20New%20Assets/Preliminary%20Report%20VT-ANB.pdf
28•ummonk•1h ago•22 comments

Show HN: Pangolin – Open source alternative to Cloudflare Tunnels

https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin
434•miloschwartz•1d ago•97 comments

LLM Inference Handbook

https://bentoml.com/llm/
277•djhu9•19h ago•14 comments

Show HN: Vibe Kanban – Kanban board to manage your AI coding agents

https://github.com/BloopAI/vibe-kanban
137•louiskw•6h ago•89 comments

OpenFront: Realtime Risk-like multiplayer game in the browser

https://openfront.io/
175•thombles•15h ago•44 comments

The ChompSaw: A benchtop power tool that's safe for kids to use

https://www.core77.com/posts/137602/The-ChompSaw-A-Benchtop-Power-Tool-Thats-Safe-for-Kids-to-Use
271•surprisetalk•4d ago•187 comments

Google nerfs Pixel 6a batteries following fire hazard

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/07/a-mess-of-its-own-making-google-nerfs-second-pixel-phone-battery-this-year/
27•fffrantz•3h ago•27 comments

Overtourism in Japan, and how it hurts small businesses

https://craigmod.com/ridgeline/210/
172•speckx•8h ago•329 comments

Introduction to Digital Filters

https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/filters/
3•ofalkaed•2h ago•0 comments

The day someone created 184 billion Bitcoin (2020)

https://decrypt.co/39750/184-billion-bitcoin-anonymous-creator
76•lawrenceyan•17h ago•82 comments

Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY does not scale

https://www.recall.ai/blog/postgres-listen-notify-does-not-scale
545•davidgu•4d ago•277 comments

Recovering from AI addiction

https://internetaddictsanonymous.org/internet-and-technology-addiction/signs-of-an-addiction-to-ai/
232•pera•10h ago•252 comments

AI agent benchmarks are broken

https://ddkang.substack.com/p/ai-agent-benchmarks-are-broken
166•neehao•8h ago•78 comments

Batch Mode in the Gemini API: Process More for Less

https://developers.googleblog.com/en/scale-your-ai-workloads-batch-mode-gemini-api/
156•xnx•4d ago•52 comments
Open in hackernews

Pa. House passes 'click-to-cancel' subscription bills

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2025/07/pa-house-passes-click-to-cancel-subscription-bills-as-court-throws-out-federal-rule.html
171•bikenaga•5h ago

Comments

toomuchtodo•5h ago
With the recent federal block of click to cancel, states implementing this will be the way to go.

> Both bills passed the House with broad bipartisan support. If the legislation is agreed to by the state Senate and signed by Gov Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania would join several other states that have moved to create such laws over the past year since the FTC began working on its now-defunct rule.

> New York, California, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Virginia have all enacted state-level policies that include provisions similar to Ciresi and Borowski’s bills.

If you live in a state that has not passed such legislation, I would encourage you to hound your reps until they do. 45 states to go.

swesour•5h ago
> Tennessee

Rare red state w.

ProllyInfamous•4h ago
I live here. We actually have fairly decent consumer protections... at least against product misrepresenation.

For example, our state constitution prohibits products being sold in containers which misrepresent the amount of their contents (albeit, it still happens).

Conversely, we also founded the pay-day-loan industry, which is just disgraceful (about a dozen states have banned entirely). Only passed because Allan Jones ("father of payday loans") donated $30,000 to PACs in the mid-90s.

I'm currently looking for greener pastures, up-to-and-including expatriation. This state overall has politicians' heads so far up their own...

toomuchtodo•4h ago
> I'm currently looking for greener pastures, up-to-and-including expatriation.

https://hiring.cafe/ might be of help, no affiliation, just want to help everyone who wants out get out. Same with https://old.reddit.com/r/AmerExit/ on the expat front.

amendegree•5h ago
Just to be clear the block was due to a procedural issue and I wouldn’t at all be surprised to see this sorta thing have bipartisan support at the federal level, seeing as it enjoys bipartisan support at the state level in every jurisdiction it is attempted. The main hurdle at the federal level would be getting it out of committee.
sokoloff•2h ago
FTC can still do it without the legislature. They just have to follow a more rigorous process in rule-making.
fumeux_fume•40m ago
The FTC under the current administration has zero interest in pushing this forward
janalsncm•1h ago
To add some color to the regulatory issue as I understand it, the court ruled that the impact of this rule would be over $100M so they’re required to assess cost/benefits of alternatives and submit them during the public comment period.

I don’t even know what the alternative would be apart from doing nothing. Making it more of a pain for consumers to cancel is zero sum on first order analysis (if I lose a dollar because I can’t cancel the company gets a dollar) but at a second order makes our economy less dynamic by entrenching incumbent companies and making it harder for consumers to allocate their money towards better alternatives.

If a company can trap your money in a labyrinth of process they don’t have to compete on quality or price. Simple as that.

vlovich123•1h ago
I’m always amazed how willing the courts are to block actions like this on vague technicalities but are then so deferent to police violations of civil liberties where even a violation can still upholds the original judgement against that person and only applies going forward.
janalsncm•15m ago
The process is broken. If there was an issue with no alternatives being specified, the right time to bring that up was during the public comment period when there weren’t any alternatives. Not after, imo.

I get that process needs to be followed but this is allowing unnecessary gamesmanship.

Retric•11m ago
You never hear about the millions of perfectly reasonable rulings every year.

The stuff based on vague technicalities that result in something you agree with isn’t memorable, so it’s the vague technicalities you disagree with that’s memorable.

bee_rider•1h ago
Do lawmakers want a dynamic economy? I guess that would make it harder to keep track of whose “lobbying” checks have cleared.
AngryData•1h ago
I don't see how it isn't blatant judicial corruption that big business gets special legal considerations because they might not earn as much money.
dfxm12•1h ago
When you look at what is happening in Washington, it is disingenuous to say something was blocked because of a procedural issue. It was blocked because the party that controls all three branches of the Federal government didn't want it to pass.
AnimalMuppet•1h ago
No, it was exactly blocked because of a procedural issue. Despite the fears of many, Trump is not yet a dictator, and the Republican Party is not in total control. Judges rule in ways that they don't like all the time.

This keeps coming up because Trump tries to act like a dictator and just order things to be the way he wants, and it doesn't work that way. There are procedures that the Federal government has to follow; it can't just ignore them and get things done right now. And in fact, the government being forced to follow procedure is a very good thing, even if it's something we want the government to do. It's one of the things standing between where we are and a dictatorship.

Supermancho•59m ago
More than that, it was a good ruling. Judges not rubberstamping non/lowball estimates rather than the mandating max costing, is toward the public good.
relaxing•29m ago
Ah yes, the old “ruling against the public good is actually toward the public good” argument.
jfengel•51m ago
I'm afraid I don't really buy that. The court didn't have to seek out this procedural issue. The rules are complex enough to justify any decision you wish. They simply decided by fiat that this case was worth more than $100 million, and overruled the subject matter experts.

It appears that they make their decision, and then justify it. That may not actually be the case -- but if it isn't, the outcome is indistinguishable.

It's true that they're not always favoring the President. But he is increasingly concentrating his power, and it favors him more and more.

stronglikedan•3h ago
> With the recent federal block of click to cancel, states implementing this will be the way to go.

State's rights is just about always the best way to go. It's nice to see the power being returned to the people.

toomuchtodo•3h ago
Usually, it’s only “states rights” when conservatives want something. To be determined if this sticks as it rolls out to more states, or the federal government attempts to infringe on state authority. No different than the Missouri governor overriding voters and repealing voter-approved paid sick leave and minimum wage law, Ohio conservatives attempting to override voters on reproductive healthcare, Florida raising the bar for ballot initiatives, Texas gerrymandering efforts currently in progress, etc.

“Maybe you do not care much about the future of the Republican Party. You should. Conservatives will always be with us. If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. The will reject democracy.” -― David Frum

https://www.google.com/search?q=hypocrisy+of+states+rights

babypuncher•2h ago
Don't forget what happened in Utah last year.

In 2018, voters passed the Better Boundaries ballot initiative, requiring our legislature to adopt non-gerrymandered congressional maps. In 2020, the legislature passed a law that effectively ignored the results of the initiative, and they drew even more gerrymandered maps after the census.

We sued the state, and last summer our Supreme Court unanimously agreed that, per the state constitution, the legislature does not have the power to unilaterally gut laws passed by ballot initiative after the fact.

So the legislature haphazardly put together their own ballot initiative that would have amended our constitution to give them the authority to ignore the results of ballot initiatives. This was put on our ballots, but our Supreme Court came through unanimously again, saying that the text of the initiative was grossly misleading and that they did not meet the constitutional requirement to notify the electorate far enough in advance of election day. This initiative was on our ballots as they had already been printed, but the results were not counted per the Supreme Court's order.

My state government is still fighting tooth and nail to kill Better Boundaries before the 2026 election. None of these lawmakers give a single shit about the will of the people.

heymijo•1h ago
Beat for beat what has happened in Ohio. Same for enshrining abortion rights in our state constitution. The state legislature is hostile to the will of the people.
xyst•3h ago
Didn’t think `states rights` bullshit reasoning would be found in HN.

Same thought process the American south used to justify slavery and precedent into the American Civil War.

ecshafer•3h ago
States rights exist in the United States, regardless of if its been used for good or ill. The United States is a federation, and States Rights ARE a thing. States Rights are also used for professional licenses and insurance regulations, jumping to slavery is absurdism.
toomuchtodo•3h ago
> "Slavery and States' Rights" was a speech given by former Confederate States Army general Joseph Wheeler on July 31, 1894. The speech deals with the American Civil War and is considered to be a "Lost Cause" view of the war's causation. It is generally understood to argue that the United States (the Union) was to blame for the war, and downplays slavery as a cause.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_and_States%27_Rights

https://web.archive.org/web/20180427082228/http://www.civilw...

https://news.wttw.com/2022/07/14/states-rights-supreme-court...

This is simply history. Calling it absurdism indicates a lack of historical knowledge. https://xkcd.com/1053/

ecshafer•2h ago
It is absurdism. It is dismissing the 10th amendment because the argument was also used for slavery. No one is thinking that states rights wasn't an argument used for slavery. But this is arguing vegetarianism is evil because hitler was.
toomuchtodo•2h ago
I argue it isn’t absurdism when the evidence is clear that the idea of state rights is continuing to be used to subjugate in direct conflict with democracy, versus the actual collective and agreed upon belief of deferring to states rights and putting power closer to the governance of those states.

Historically, it was slavery. Now it’s immigration, reproductive rights, etc. History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. It’s always about control exceeding genuine governance. Maybe that'll change, but until evidence and outcomes demonstrate otherwise, "the purpose of the system is what it does."

reliabilityguy•1h ago
> the evidence is clear that the idea of state rights is continuing to be used to subjugate in direct conflict with democracy

Can you provide an example of such evidence?

simplify•2h ago
Anything can be used for evil, doesn't mean that thing instantly becomes evil.
armchairhacker•2h ago
Allowing states to regulate subscriptions is different than slavery.

In particular, states shouldn’t have the right to restrict travel. If the slaves had free travel they would just leave for northern states. If people are able to leave to other states (even if it means rebuilding their life), plenty of bad state laws are OK because those affected will do so.

relaxing•17m ago
The 14th amendment says no state shall deprive you of your life or liberty, not a minimum of one state, should you have have the funds and will to move there.
AngryData•1h ago
Could I not make the same argument against you for authoritarian central state rule bullshit? Maybe in some European countries it might actually work alright in their current political climates. But how can you look at the US right now and be like "Yes, we need more centralized and powerful government despite the federal government already wielding far more power than ever before or ever imagined in the past." We have literal centuries full of lessons on why strong authoritarian governments are trash and inevitably result in oppression, corruption, internal conflict, and war.
__turbobrew__•2h ago
> State's rights is just about always the best way to go

Generally agreed. I live in Canada and think we would be much better off if we pushed more legislation away from the feds and to the provinces. The needs/wants of Alberta/Saskatchewan is much different than Quebec for example.

Gun control is a major divisive issue in Canada as gun control is 100% at the federal level, but the preferences of how it is handles varies hugely between provinces, so much so that some provinces are threatening to not enforce the federal laws.

Im fine with the feds managing border enforcement, immigration, and military — and collecting taxes to fund those programs — but other than that they should leave to the provinces.

The other alternative is that everyone is subject to the mob rule of the major population centers which have much different needs/wants then those outside of the centers. Why not just give the population centers what they want and those in rural areas what they want?

mook•2h ago
Gun control is harder to do like that because guns are physical objects and it's trivial to bring them across unmanned borders. Something like subscriptions are much easier to deal with because that can just be based on billing address.
nkrisc•2h ago
That’s good and all for things that begin and end within a single state. Some things really should be done at the federal level. I don’t think a single service I subscribe to is based in the state in which I live.
Spivak•1h ago
Doesn't matter, you get click-to-cancel as long as you're in the state that has the law. Where they are based is irrelevant.
nkrisc•1h ago
It's absurd that such laws would need to be passed 50 times for all US citizens to benefit from it. It should be done at the federal level.

State and local laws should be addressing state and local issues. The pros and cons of a click-to-cancel law don't change from state to state.

0cf8612b2e1e•1h ago
No way this passes in 50 states. I would guess something like 15 states pass an analogous law.

The question: will companies segregate their customers? Everyone gets to click-to-cancel or is there now a dedicated code path just for the lucky few?

We are only here because so many businesses made it a burden to cancel, so I know how I would bet.

dfxm12•1h ago
State's rights doesn't give power to the people. It gives power to mostly gerrymandered state legislatures and to appointed judges.

Click to cancel is popular among the people. It was blocked despite this. If the people had power (as opposed to lobbyists, or big business), this would had passed federally.

kstrauser•2h ago
I confess to a lot of schadenfreude at the powers that be, like the US Chamber of Commerce, who fight against these federal bills and then find themselves fighting 50 slightly incompatible laws. Oh, you thought it was going to be hard to comply with that one, single pro-consumer regulation? Have fun!

See also: a patchwork of privacy laws[0] that are vastly harder to comply with than a national level GDPR-style law would be.

[0] https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/privacy/state-privacy-...

ChrisArchitect•4h ago
Related background:

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44504699

xyst•3h ago
As a software engineer, this means job security, lol.

If a few more states pass similar legislation, the default would be to make it as easy as possible to unsubscribe/cancel.

breadwinner•3h ago
One of the ways to prevent unauthorized charges is to use a virtual credit card. Many credit cards provide a way to create virtual credit card based on your real credit card, for example, Citibank [1] and Capital One [2]. Then if the merchant makes it hard for you to cancel, just delete your virtual credit card.

You can specify any expiration date for the virtual card (with at least 1 month validity). You can also set per-transaction limits on this credit card, which ensures the merchant can't charge more than the agreed amount.

[1] https://www.cardbenefits.citi.com/Products/Virtual-Account-N...

[2] https://www.capitalone.com/learn-grow/money-management/what-...

JumpCrisscross•2h ago
> One of the ways to prevent unauthorized charges is to use a virtual credit card

This prevents payments, not charges. I’ve met two totally separate funds that buy up these claims and litigate them because killing your card doesn’t void the purchase contract. (And your liability keeps actuating so long as it’s not cancelled.)

breadwinner•2h ago
That's true. In addition to preventing payments, you also have to make a reasonable attempt to cancel service.

Recently in the case of Dish Network, I tried to call to cancel service, and the wait time is 45 minutes. There's no way I am doing that. (They don't let you cancel online or via chat, calling is the only option). Instead I contacted state attorney general's office and they made Dish cancel service.

If you can prove that you made reasonable attempt to cancel service then you're off the hook. In my case Dish sent my account to collections (for the 1 month it took to cancel service) and I wrote them back that I am not paying and why. Never heard back from them after that.

JumpCrisscross•1h ago
Sending a letter to the company pretty much always works and provides proof of the attempt to boot.
fuckinpuppers•3h ago
This sucks that it’s not federal. All these separate state regulations just create more burden on the company side to keep up, and we almost had it federally. :(

I am happy to see states still pushing forward. But it’s just so disappointing how much is being taken away for everyone.

scosman•2h ago
The company only has burden if they want to maintain maximally sketchy but legal business practices in every possible locale. Doing the right thing is easy to implement.
bee_rider•1h ago
The companies have lots of money. If they are having trouble following the laws, they can just direct the lobbying they were going to do at passing a universal consumer protection law.
floatrock•1h ago
Creating more burden on the company side to keep up is the point -- feature, not a bug.

Who do you think lobbies against a federal-level pro-consumer bill? Hint: it's not the consumers.

The risk of a huge patchwork of not-completely-overlapping state level bills is one of the few checks consumers have against federal-level regulatory capture: if it's between a single set of federal-level rules vs. a patchwork of state-by-state rules, the profitable move becomes "okay, lets just let them have the federal-level rules."

The failure modes, of course, are:

- a completely-defanged federal rule which is worse than no rule (right-to-repair has continued to suffer this)

- further consolidation: if it's expensive to do business in multiple states, only the companies with the deepest pockets can continue to grow

Personally, though, my money is still on a growing patchwork of state laws will eventually necessitate a good-enough federal law.

ruralfam•2h ago
I have a good many subs or monthly plans. Only one sends me an email notifying me that I will be soon be billed and the amount billed. All the others never provide any notification whatsoever. Can PA also consider a bill that requires notification of billing via email?? I'd bet this rule combined with easy-to-cancel would be of great, great, benefit to the good citizens of PA.
account7213•2h ago
The article says this doesn't apply to entities regulated by the state utility commission, the FCC or specifically gym memberships. That would seem to exclude a lot of the worst offenders.
pclowes•1h ago
I wonder how hard it would be to generate synthetic credit card numbers for each subscription service and then just cancel that "card".

I feel there is a whole cadre of consumer tech that is defensive against corporate taxes/tolls on our time. Eg: auto phone tree navigator, only allowing calls from double opted in contacts etc.

Buttons840•1h ago
Sometimes the company will continue to seek payment and put the missed payments on your credit report.

That should be illegal as well. If people stop paying for a continual service, like a streaming service or a magazine, then the service should just stop; companies shouldn't be able to accrue credit and continue seeking payment, just cancel the service and be done.

If something like a magazine wants a year payment upfront, then let them charge for a full year before the first magazine is delivered.

57473m3n7Fur7h3•1h ago
There are many banks that offer virtual cards. Meaning you can generate unique numbers and individually disable those card numbers.

A related thing is, with Revolut you have disposable cards that are only possible to charge a single time. Unfortunately I have had a bad time trying to use disposable cards. One time I tried it the merchant did a single reversible charge for like a dollar to verify the card and then they couldn’t charge the actual amount so the purchase failed. Another time for a subscription service (I wanted to try their free 30 day trial without forgetting to cancel in time) they apparently got metadata telling them the card was disposable and they refused it so I had to use the non-disposable card number after all.

ge96•1h ago
Interesting I thought it didn't pass (maybe was a different one for the entire country)

Yeah the gym cancellation thing where you have to drive to the location and sign a paper was annoying me/had to do it

Hope they do something similar with cookies where there has to be an option to say no/reject all

apparent•48m ago
> The bills would also not cover gyms – notorious for arduous membership cancellation policies – which are controlled by the state Health Club Act. This could be amended into the legislation, which Ciresi said he was open to.

What possible good faith reason could there be for exempting gyms?

adamm255•41m ago
Good faith LOL
metalman•18m ago
fat people epidemic, and the idea that obesity is deadly, so make it harderfor people to give up on there resolutions
brikym•40m ago
I should be able to cancel from my bank. Use the Visa/MC monopoly for good.