https://old.reddit.com/r/bayarea/comments/1nnia94/earthquake...
It's fun to think about it - some Japanese people would move to CA just because of the more stable geology.
As a result, [modern] Japanese construction is incredibly resilient.
I've never been in Tokyo, during a strong quake, but I'm told the skyscrapers wave around like drunken dancers.
~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Andreas_Fault#The_next_%22...
I question their research skills. I would avoid California if geology was my main motivator.
San Andreas sounds like nothing by comparison, especially since it doesn't pose as much of a tsunami risk.
This quake is a tad more notable than rain in LA in the summer. In other words, not very notable. That doesn't make it zero, just very low.
I'm pretty sure this is the closest epicenter to SF I've seen too (at least one that was noticeable)
4.3 will certainly get your attention if you're relatively close-by... but yeah, worth a "did you feel that?!" on the local news and not much more.
sedatk•2h ago
subharmonicon•2h ago
SllX•2h ago
huevosabio•1h ago
Luckily it was short.
rbanffy•1h ago
marcosscriven•1h ago
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2000/sep/25/uknews
idiotsecant•49m ago