And if you think housing prices are bad in the US, you should look at the rest of the developed world.
Renters will always exist, and some will be unable or unwilling to adhere to the contract they signed. Like all contracts, there are penalities for non-compliance (on both sides).
> $15 or 5% of rent, whichever is GREATER. 5-day grace period. One-time fee per late payment.
But this site seems to say the legal maximum is whichever is lower (i.e., it won't go above $15).
I see all the bugs here about how it minimizes fees by reversing a particular comparison, and for a second I got excited -- maybe it's a subversive site? But no, just AI blunders.
On one hand, you did agree to the payment schedule when you signed the lease, but on the other hand, tacking on fees to someone who is already struggling to pay, to support mainly parasites responsible for creating a lot of the issues facing young people, is also not great.
That's just the reality of sending bills or invoices. Half the time it's not about malice, just no reason to bother being timely.
The cases of abuse are so egregious precisely because most people were just normal well meaning people doing their best to meet their obligations.
hrgdevBuilds•3h ago
Rent laws vary widely: some states set a fixed dollar cap, others a percentage, and a few use only “reasonable” language that’s open to interpretation. Many renters and landlords have no easy way to check what’s actually allowed without reading the statutes themselves.
This project compiles those laws into an instant calculator. Enter rent amount, due date, payment date, and state — it shows the lawful late fee limit, grace period rules, and citation.
It started as a curiosity after seeing conflicting answers online. The goal is transparency, not advocacy; all data is drawn from current state statutes.
The app is lightweight, built in Replit, and runs entirely client-side. I’d be interested in feedback on legal interpretation consistency, data sourcing, or UI clarity.
candiddevmike•2h ago
I'd love to see some kind of 50 state tenant resource center, geared towards providing tenants with advice and legal resources.
axus•2h ago
limagnolia•2h ago
ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
Every now and then, some municipality claims that it will be "fighting illegal apartments," but they die quick deaths. If they got serious about it, the homeless population would explode, and a lot of folks would leave the state.
Also, I believe that most of the rules that apply to apartments, come from municipalities, not states.
gruez•1h ago
What does this mean in practice? Courts won't enforce late fees or unpaid rents? Landlords can't evict bad tenants? Renters can terminate leases without any penalty?
ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
Landlords get in a lot of trouble, for renting illegal apartments.
I have friends that rented apartments, and had Pacific Heights-type[0] problem tenants.
The COVID era was a horror. Many tenants just stopped paying rent entirely.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Heights_(film)
pixelatedindex•30m ago
Do you have a source for this because I’m not convinced. Maybe a small portion do but the majority face no penalties. When I was in college the number of questionably legal homes for rent was insane, but I didn’t have time to go after them. A friend of mine did and won, but it required a lot of time. Most of the time the landlord does what they want and the renters don’t have the resources to go after them.
You make it sound like it’s the renters who take advantage of the landlords but most of the time it’s the landlords who do whatever they want. The ones who stopped paying rent probably were doing so legally because a lot of them were forced to not work.
bombcar•28m ago
Landlords naturally (e.g., by the nature) have the upper hand because they have the desired thing - the rental.
Tenants often have the legal upper hand, but the whole job of the landlord (even good ones!) is to work out which tenants know how to play the game and not rent to them.
hrimfaxi•1h ago
ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
Most folks don't want to saw off the branch they are sitting on, though, so they play nice.
Spooky23•1h ago
terminalshort•38m ago
bombcar•30m ago
jermaustin1•2m ago
They do that enough times, and all of a sudden now speeding is legal because no one was charged with speeding, but with "driving with an invalid instrument".
This would basically get rid of the "easy plea downs" and basically make fighting against the book the norm.
IRL example:
I once pulled out of my driveway and passed a stopped school bus (with lights on, but no stop signs extended) on a divided highway (barrier between my side of the road and theirs), a cop saw me do that, went around the barrier and pulled me over a couple minutes later. I was charged with something that was going to instantly take my license away.
I went to my local courthouse on the designated day, the prosecuter brought me in and told me he would drop the charges to failure to stop at a stop sign. I said I didn't pass a stop sign, and that the bus didn't have them extended, just stopped with lights on, across a highway from me.
Prosecutor said, that I'm allowed to argue that in front of a judge along with paying some large sum, and potentially lose my license, or take a point, and pay $150 today and be done with it.
I chose the latter.
jjmarr•23m ago
ryandrake•1h ago
eadmund•54m ago
Everyone also wants to pay as little as he can, too.
Fortunately, as long as there are many buyers and many sellers, the market tends to find efficient prices. When there is a monopoly or a monopsony, though, prices get out of wack.
Bjartr•46m ago
Not everybody everybody. Some people want to charge/pay/receive the maximum reasonable amount. Where "reasonable" is informed by social norms. The existence of so many amoral corporations, and sociopathic individuals running them, has absolutely skewed social expectations though.
Such people are certainly less common, but they do exist (anecdata of one, me)
Homo economicus does not actually exist.
walkabout•36m ago
Tons of kids aren’t taught that, some of them start businesses, and they may struggle to make ends meet (or at least to thrive like they could be) because raising prices to market rates feels so unfair to them that they won’t do it unless prodded to and told it’s ok by someone else (and they still might not)
I definitely am not convinced market-rate-is-ethical-and-fair is natural thinking for most people, or the kind of thing they want to do.
(I’ve been the one telling people they should raise prices and I still can’t shake the feeling that it’s kinda wrong…)
sojsurf•12m ago
If you don't increase your prices with inflation, your business will not be sustainable in the long term.
Fraterkes•1h ago
terminalshort•48m ago
limagnolia•2h ago
limagnolia•2h ago
corndoge•1h ago
gruez•1h ago
[1] Replit bills itself as "an AI-powered platform for building professional web apps and websites."
zahlman•1h ago
Scoundreller•44m ago
gruez•41m ago
tl;dr: they pivoted from offering services adjacent to "learn to code" (among other things) to vibecoding
pton_xd•1h ago
Needs a higher-powered AI, I'd say.