I managed to get 2 devices communicating across town at least ! (After having antenna issues)
At frequencies this high, you’re realistically limited to near line of sight paths.
Shame, but at least now I understand why, thanks :)
> you’re realistically limited to near line of sight paths
Wonder exactly how far one would be able to get up to reach 1,000km line of sight, assuming you put both points equally far up. Guessing it's the curvature of the earth that gets in the way at that distance?
[0] https://www.hackster.io/news/fossasat-1-an-open-source-satel...
This is just too crazy, thanks a lot for sharing these links! :)
What's the E2E latency on that, for curiosities sake :)
exabrial•6h ago
Beware of what nailed the Meshtastic people: These chips don't have temperature dependent crystal oscillators. Transmitting more than a few milliseconds causing a temperature rise, throwing the clock off, causing transmission warpage, causing timing errors, causing transmission failures.
Neywiny•5h ago
exabrial•3h ago
bigfatkitten•5h ago
Cheap modules have cheap crystals, better ones have a TCXO.
ShakataGaNai•4h ago
For the detailed run down, see https://cdn.sparkfun.com/assets/f/f/b/4/2/SX1262_AN-Recommen... page 14
> In the case of an SX1262 operating at +22 dBm in the US 902 – 928 MHz band, the frequency drift measured during the maximum LoRAWAN™ packet duration stays below the maximum limit, provided thermal insulation is implemented around the crystal during PCB design.
> At extreme temperatures (below -20 °C and above 70 °C), it is recommended to use a TCXO.
> For any other frequency bands corresponding to longer RF packet transmissions at +22 dBm, it is recommended to use a TCXO.
buckle8017•43m ago
As used in the meshtastic devices this chip does actually fail doing normal Lora transmission under reasonable conditions.
I know because I've seen the exact failure.
oakwhiz•1h ago