frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Nano Banana Pro

https://blog.google/technology/ai/nano-banana-pro/
889•meetpateltech•12h ago•547 comments

Android and iPhone users can now share files, starting with the Pixel 10

https://blog.google/products/android/quick-share-airdrop/
521•abraham•10h ago•320 comments

FEX-emu – Run x86 applications on ARM64 Linux devices

https://fex-emu.com/
99•open-paren•1w ago•32 comments

Exploring the Fragmentation of Wayland, an xdotool adventure

https://www.semicomplete.com/blog/xdotool-and-exploring-wayland-fragmentation/
47•viraptor•5d ago•23 comments

Why top firms fire good workers

https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/employee-turnover-why-top-firms-churn-good-workers-681832/
34•hhs•3h ago•14 comments

New Glenn Update

https://www.blueorigin.com/news/new-glenn-upgraded-engines-subcooled-components-drive-enhanced-pe...
123•rbanffy•6h ago•61 comments

New OS aims to provide (some) compatibility with macOS

https://github.com/ravynsoft/ravynos
150•kasajian•7h ago•66 comments

Data-at-Rest Encryption in DuckDB

https://duckdb.org/2025/11/19/encryption-in-duckdb
144•chmaynard•8h ago•16 comments

NTSB Preliminary Report – UPS Boeing MD-11F Crash [pdf]

https://www.ntsb.gov/Documents/Prelimiary%20Report%20DCA26MA024.pdf
148•gregsadetsky•9h ago•163 comments

Over-regulation is doubling the cost

https://rein.pk/over-regulation-is-doubling-the-cost
89•bilsbie•5h ago•123 comments

The Lions Operating System

https://lionsos.org
127•plunderer•9h ago•28 comments

GitHut – Programming Languages and GitHub (2014)

https://githut.info/
53•tonyhb•6h ago•21 comments

CBP is monitoring US drivers and detaining those with suspicious travel patterns

https://apnews.com/article/immigration-border-patrol-surveillance-drivers-ice-trump-9f5d05469ce8c...
582•jjwiseman•8h ago•675 comments

Okta's NextJS-0auth troubles

https://joshua.hu/ai-slop-okta-nextjs-0auth-security-vulnerability
240•ramimac•2d ago•89 comments

He built underground maze of light-filled earth homes in CA Sierras [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0bHhmpyKGg
23•surprisetalk•1w ago•8 comments

Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-21/airlines-virgin-australia-qantas-ban-power-banks/106033982
39•mryall•6h ago•36 comments

Measuring Latency (2015)

https://bravenewgeek.com/everything-you-know-about-latency-is-wrong/
12•dempedempe•2h ago•4 comments

The Banished Bottom of the Housing Market

https://www.ryanpuzycki.com/p/the-banished-bottom-of-the-housing
168•barry-cotter•12h ago•190 comments

Hilbert space: treating functions as vectors

https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2025/hilbert-space-treating-functions-as-vectors/
6•signa11•1w ago•0 comments

Free interactive tool that shows you how PCIe lanes work on motherboards

https://mobomaps.com
165•tagyro•1d ago•30 comments

Microsoft makes Zork open-source

https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2025/11/20/preserving-code-that-shaped-generations-zork-i-i...
474•tabletcorry•9h ago•198 comments

Show HN: F32 – An Extremely Small ESP32 Board

https://github.com/PegorK/f32
207•pegor•1d ago•31 comments

Adversarial poetry as a universal single-turn jailbreak mechanism in LLMs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15304
253•capgre•15h ago•135 comments

Launch HN: Poly (YC S22) – Cursor for Files

45•aabhay•10h ago•48 comments

World Othello Championship Finals

https://flipthedisc.com/live/320
6•Tepix•5d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are Markov chains so different from tiny LLMs?

131•JPLeRouzic•3d ago•87 comments

Autocomp: An ADRS Framework for Optimizing Tensor Accelerator Code

https://adrs-ucb.notion.site/autocomp
67•accheng•5h ago•49 comments

Interactive World History Atlas Since 3000 BC

http://geacron.com/home-en/
298•not_knuth•18h ago•130 comments

Two recently found works of J.S. Bach presented in Leipzig [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hXzUGYIL9M#t=15m19s
109•Archelaos•3d ago•77 comments

Show HN: My hobby OS that runs Minecraft

https://astral-os.org/posts/2025/10/31/astral-minecraft.html
139•avaliosdev•3d ago•17 comments
Open in hackernews

Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-21/airlines-virgin-australia-qantas-ban-power-banks/106033982
39•mryall•6h ago

Comments

AtlasBarfed•5h ago
Isn't LFP dense enough for power banks now? And far more stable/safe?

Heck, isn't Sodium Ion getting good enough now?

JumpinJack_Cash•5h ago
Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board.

Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air.

It's the same thing for nuclear

poemxo•5h ago
Most people don't have nuclear bombs.
JumpinJack_Cash•5h ago
Yes but what I mean is that nobody checks anything
ash_091•4h ago
A train can go from "cruising speed" to letting passengers off to escape a fire in about a minute.

A plane might take anywhere from five minutes to several hours to be able to safely let passengers out.

Personally I feel that's a good enough reason to impose more robust restrictions on Things Which May Cause Fire on planes compared to trains. Especially in the case of lithium batteries where they're more or less impossible to extinguish one they're going.

zamadatix•52m ago
I agree with the concept of comparing risk being the meaningful approach, but I disagree this is how you go about measuring risk. How many people are being injured/killed per million km or something is the type of metric. Air travel far exceeds those types of metrics vs other common modes of travel, yet is always the first one to be further focused on how bad it could potentially be.
appreciatorBus•40m ago
I would argue at the performance of aviation safety, and the constant focus on how bad it could be, is exactly why aviation is safe. The day that we decide to stop focussing on what could go wrong, is the day that aviation stops being safe.

For example, if aircraft come within five nautical miles or I think it’s 1000 vertical feet, it’s considered a very serious incident. Not because anyone is in danger at five nautical miles or 1000 vertical feet, but because if you don’t draw the line there, and treat that barrier as seriously as if two aircraft had collided, then there isn’t really a barrier at all.

TylerE•10m ago
I disagree with there being no danger at 5nm.

Depending on courses and speeds that 5nm could go to zero in as little as 16 seconds or so. Airliners are not especially maneuverable.

Yes, the odds of the courses actually intersecting are small, but not zero.

Wistar•27m ago
I have, for a while now, wondered when an airborne battery incident will be calamitous enough for a complete ban on power banks.
Krssst•4h ago
Uncontrolled fire in a plane is almost certain death if you don't land within minutes. You cannot land once the fire takes out the cables necessary for flight controls. Airplanes can still operate until landing after various mistreatments but uncontrolled fire is not one of them.
JumpinJack_Cash•2h ago
What are the odds that a lithium battery would cause uncontrolled fire? We are around them daily, ever since the 80s-90s , to this day I have never seen one in person.

Look at this guy, he puts a screwdriver through phones for show off on youtube, intentionally damaging the battry...nothing dangerous or uncontrolled happens, the little smoke is the equivalent of a couple of cigarettes.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gcjfJfbOVkY

And all the psychological tests on pilots, no train or bus pilot has to go through the same stuff even though they have a similar number of souls on board

I'll go to my grave claiming that aviation has to fight for its existence on a daily basis by clearing impossible standards because people are scared , intuitively scared of flight as humans aren't supposed to be able to do that and all our ancestors who tried failed miserably by falling off a tree or something.

The percentage of people who get the physics of why a plane flies are less than 1% of those who ever flew, and that is not even the majority of the 9 billion humans yet, hell not even a quarter.

"If your phone falls through the seats DON'T TRY TO RECOVER IT as the seat (which is fixed) might damage it and cause a fire" lmao

Next thing they'd be making announcements on how to seat as a particularly fat individual missing their seat could land on their ass and fall through the fusolage causing a decompression...give me a break

icehawk•48m ago
Non-zero:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_6

> The report indicated that the fire was caused by the autoignition of the contents of a cargo pallet that contained more than 81,000 lithium batteries and other combustible materials

an0malous•34m ago
So we just need to limit to 80,999 power banks on a plane at once
lisbbb•5h ago
Doesn't every cell phone have a highly volatile, made in China battery in it as well? What if they started banning smartphones on flights! Oh the humanity!
mikestew•3h ago
What if, indeed…

https://www.skolnik.com/blog/how-airlines-are-enforcing-the-...

JumpCrisscross•52m ago
> Doesn't every cell phone have a highly volatile, made in China battery in it as well?

They're smaller, and thus contain less energy, and are typically also less powerful.

Workaccount2•5h ago
>five in-flight fires involving power banks on Australian or Australian-registered aircraft since 2016.

So about one every two years. Better ban everything with a battery before this gets out of control.../s

ars•4h ago
The title is misleading unless you read it carefully.

They are not banning bringing power banks, they are banning using power banks. On the plane you have to keep the power bank on your person, but not use it.

This would be a lot more defensible if they had high-power USB-C ports by every seat.

appreciatorBus•42m ago
I’m sure you don’t mean this, but it sounds like you’re saying that if airlines don’t provide high-power USB, passengers would prefer the risk of dying in a fire rather than going without their devices. Of course, now that I type that out, I worry that perhaps many people would make exactly that choice. Regardless, I would argue that aviation safety is much more important than device preference - if that means, we all have to go back to paper books, then so be it.
holysoles•23m ago
I'm pretty certain their intent was that passengers would be less upset by the rule change, and certainly less motivated to try to circumvent/violate them if they had reliable charging ports available
instagib•4h ago
“Australian airlines will ban the use of portable power banks… and Emirates”
jerlam•3h ago
China bans non-certified power banks on their domestic flights, even if they're not in use. And the certification authority is China-specific, they don't care about UL or any others.

https://www.travelofchina.com/china-power-bank-ban-2025-xiao...

etempleton•3h ago
Is the issue that many power banks have cheaply made batteries compared to phones, tablets, and laptops? Why power banks specifically?

If the issue is quality control is there certification that airlines might require?

trollbridge•20m ago
Because the quality control on power banks is absolute rubbish. They're typically bought from no-name vendors on Amazon with zero accountability for if they go bad.

Overall, the U.S. and other countries need to start requiring UL listing for stuff like this before it can be imported into the country (and strict liability for any domestic manufacturers).

joeblubaugh•3h ago
I’ve been getting this message on international flights for the last two months already - no using power banks at any time on the plane.

At some point lithium ion battery packs are going to be completely excluded from luggage and it’ll be chaos

polishdude20•3h ago
I would use a battery pack less if the outlets on the planes actually worked! On my last 4 flights I've had outlets completely disabled.
jtokoph•2h ago
And when they do work, my North American two prong plug falls right out half of the time.
dylan604•48m ago
That just sounds like another way of not working. Even if there is power, if the socket doesn’t hold the prongs, it’s not going to power your device.
trollbridge•21m ago
A trick (on U.S. airlines) is to plug in an overseas adapter (British style plugs seem to work pretty well for this purpose), since those prongs see far less use and still grip well.
zamadatix•1h ago
Or make the seatback USB solution a bit more modular and update it every 5 years. Nobody is bringing a toaster on board, they just need something more than a 5 Watt USB A port for their devices.
jballer•47m ago
You have to look up the maximum wattage for the given cabin configuration. I’ve found 30W to be about as high as I can go without it cutting out. Use a phone charger for your laptop.

This is where it’s helpful to have a multi-port charger where they’re not all high-draw.

IMO more important to go with something flat or light that won’t fall out under its own weight.

musicale•1h ago
As batteries pack more and more energy into smaller and smaller spaces, what could possibly go wrong?
Helithumper•44m ago
Title should be updated to Virgin Australia. The article doesn't reference Virgin Atlantic or any other Virgin brands.
jMyles•40m ago
It's nice when rules can be written in sense instead of blood. I don't know if that's the case here. But any fire on an aircraft is close to the latter.
aetherspawn•20m ago
The issue is that these power banks are often cheapo corporate gifts or bought out of vending machines, catering to the cheapest possible price and not certified to anything.

In this case they have crappy BMS that doesn’t have thermal sensors or even make sure the cells are balanced during charging, and no mechanical integrity so the cell can just get crushed and explode.

The solution is to require all consumer electronics with batteries to be certified (if carried on a plane or in the post), and part of that certification process needs to be mechanical; including crushing with normal levels of in-transit forces, and electrical testing; including charging the device at a high temperature.