frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

iPhone 17 Pro Demonstrated Running a 400B LLM

https://twitter.com/anemll/status/2035901335984611412
249•anemll•3h ago•146 comments

Trivy under attack again: Widespread GitHub Actions tag compromise secrets

https://socket.dev/blog/trivy-under-attack-again-github-actions-compromise
46•jicea•1d ago•16 comments

BIO: The Bao I/O Coprocessor

https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/2026/bio-the-bao-i-o-coprocessor/
35•zdw•2d ago•8 comments

Cyber.mil serving file downloads using TLS certificate which expired 3 days ago

https://www.cyber.mil/stigs/downloads
98•Eduard•2h ago•93 comments

Is it a pint?

https://isitapint.com/
103•cainxinth•2h ago•91 comments

Bombadil: Property-based testing for web UIs

https://github.com/antithesishq/bombadil
177•Klaster_1•4d ago•70 comments

Show HN: Threadprocs – executables sharing one address space (0-copy pointers)

https://github.com/jer-irl/threadprocs
37•jer-irl•2h ago•27 comments

An unsolicited guide to being a researcher [pdf]

https://emerge-lab.github.io/papers/an-unsolicited-guide-to-good-research.pdf
106•sebg•4d ago•16 comments

I built an AI receptionist for a mechanic shop

https://www.itsthatlady.dev/blog/building-an-ai-receptionist-for-my-brother/
90•mooreds•7h ago•112 comments

If DSPy is so great, why isn't anyone using it?

https://skylarbpayne.com/posts/dspy-engineering-patterns/
152•sbpayne•3h ago•95 comments

Digs: Offline-first iOS app to browse your Discogs vinyl collection

https://lustin.fr/blog/building-digs/
7•rlustin•9h ago•0 comments

Migrating to the EU

https://rz01.org/eu-migration/
680•exitnode•8h ago•553 comments

Walmart: ChatGPT checkout converted 3x worse than website

https://searchengineland.com/walmart-chatgpt-checkout-converted-worse-472071
304•speckx•3d ago•208 comments

Two pilots dead after plane and ground vehicle collide at LaGuardia

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy01g522ww4o
127•mememememememo•10h ago•221 comments

PC Gamer recommends RSS readers in a 37mb article that just keeps downloading

https://stuartbreckenridge.net/2026-03-19-pc-gamer-recommends-rss-readers-in-a-37mb-article/
770•JumpCrisscross•23h ago•357 comments

Side-Effectful Expressions in C (2023)

https://blog.xoria.org/expr-stmt-c/
17•surprisetalk•5d ago•1 comments

GitHub appears to be struggling with measly three nines availability

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/10/github_outages/
352•richtr•7h ago•180 comments

General Motors is assisting with the restoration of a rare EV1

https://evinfo.net/2026/03/general-motors-is-assisting-with-the-restoration-of-an-1996-ev1/
65•betacollector64•3d ago•71 comments

The gold standard of optimization: A look under the hood of RollerCoaster Tycoon

https://larstofus.com/2026/03/22/the-gold-standard-of-optimization-a-look-under-the-hood-of-rolle...
528•mariuz•23h ago•142 comments

Tin Can, a 'landline' for kids

https://www.businessinsider.com/tin-can-landline-kids-cellphone-cell-alternative-how-2025-9
273•tejohnso•3d ago•219 comments

“Collaboration” is bullshit

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/collaboration-is-bullshit/
165•mitchbob•16h ago•76 comments

Show HN: The King Wen Permutation: [52, 10, 2]

https://gzw1987-bit.github.io/iching-math/
50•gezhengwen•9h ago•24 comments

Reports of code's death are greatly exaggerated

https://stevekrouse.com/precision
535•stevekrouse•1d ago•394 comments

GoGoGrandparent (YC S16) is hiring Back end Engineers

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/gogograndparent/jobs/2vbzAw8-backend-engineer
1•davidchl•14h ago

The future of version control

https://bramcohen.com/p/manyana
621•c17r•1d ago•346 comments

Can you get root with only a cigarette lighter? (2024)

https://www.da.vidbuchanan.co.uk/blog/dram-emfi.html
151•HeliumHydride•3d ago•30 comments

Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded in the US

https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/20/cyberattack-on-vehicle-breathalyzer-company-leaves-drivers-stra...
95•speckx•5h ago•133 comments

Nanopositioning Metrology, Gödel, and Bootstraps

https://www.pi-usa.us/en/tech-blog/nanopositioning-metrology-goedel-and-bootstraps
17•nill0•4d ago•2 comments

Why I love NixOS

https://www.birkey.co/2026-03-22-why-i-love-nixos.html
411•birkey•1d ago•277 comments

Project Nomad – Knowledge That Never Goes Offline

https://www.projectnomad.us
562•jensgk•1d ago•204 comments
Open in hackernews

Is it a pint?

https://isitapint.com/
102•cainxinth•2h ago

Comments

jjgreen•2h ago
In Yorkshire a short pint will result in "Could you fit a whiskey in there?", "yes of course", "THEN FILL IT WITH BEER"
calebelac•1h ago
I'm going to start using this approach. Cheers!
bombcar•2h ago
In the EU I noticed lots of glasses had markings on the side - if it was full to the line, it was a pint (or liter or whatever).

McDonalds cups have a line for ice.

RGamma•1h ago
Measuring beer is serious business in Germany to the point the EU commission had to comment on a rule change that supposedly forbade the usage of steins for foaming drinks (it didn't, but Germany wanted to be extra strict): https://www.bayern3.de/bier-steinkrug-eu-richtlinie

https://germany.representation.ec.europa.eu/news/klarstellun...

Symbiote•1h ago
At least in the UK it's a legal requirement to use marked glassware when serving beer, cider and wine. (Or to use a marked measuring cylinder and pour that into the drinkware, which is sometimes done for wine.)

It's also the law in at least some EU countries, although I haven't checked beyond Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fill_line

BoxOfRain•57m ago
In true British fashion the requirements for draught beer and cider are in pints, while wine is sold in millilitres.
luplex•1h ago
and crucially, foam has to be above the line.

There is some back and forth around whether it's legal to serve beer in traditional ceramic steins, where customers can not verify that the foam really starts above the line.

As I understand, it is legal in Germany, but only if there is visible signage that informs customers about their right to pour their beer into a marked standard glass to check the amount. Source (German): https://www.abendblatt.de/incoming/article402102835/wer-hat-...

In 1899, an association was formed in Munich to combat fraudulent pouring. It was banned by the Nazis and re-formed in 1970. They went around and measured beers. This post is its spiritual successor. German: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verein_gegen_betr%C3%BCgerisch...

tveita•1h ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fill_line

Selling drinks in mislabeled containers should warrant a fraud report to your local consumer protection agency. A crowdsourcing app seems like the wrong tool here.

bombcar•1h ago
The US is a different place; though I will say that in Europe everything seemed to be right on the line, whereas in the US I'd say that most pours were to the very brim (likely giving me more than advertised).
jghn•1h ago
In the US at least it's pretty common to see bars using cheater pints. They look like 16 oz pint glasses but with a few tricks wind up only holding 14 oz
Waterluvian•1h ago
In Canada (and I’m sure elsewhere) there are surprise inspections where government inspectors show up at petrol stations and see if the pump actually gives you what it claims.

I volunteer for the pub equivalent of this.

9rx•1h ago
You're in luck. Measurement Canada has the authority to inspect pints. Typically they only act on complaints, though.

https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/measurement-canada/en/buyin...

ryandrake•1h ago
I have a feeling that if the USA did random, surprise inspections on businesses to make sure what they were selling was actually as-advertised, the whole system would be exposed as fraud within a month.
lucideer•1h ago
I don't know if other companies do this anywhere but if you live in Ireland. Diageo have roles for people to travel around the country doing precisely this.
arkensaw•1h ago
ah yes, the guinness vans, I do often see them out and about
bluGill•1h ago
In the US every gas pump I've seen (I have not check the majority of states, but still a good sample) has a sticker on it stating inspections and who runs the state department that inspects them. Usually it is a yearly inspection (at least according to the sticker, maybe they do it more often I don't know)
skeptrune•1h ago
Most useful website I've been on in a hot minute
badgersnake•1h ago
We’ve had laws requiring landlords to serve standardised pints the UK since 1698. This is not a new problem.
xnorswap•1h ago
1985 is the current one: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/72/contents

It's why all bars will have a little plaque saying what size their shots are. Almost always 25ml these days, but 35ml was common in many places. You're allowed to serve shots of either size but not in the same pub.

( edit: Better link: https://www.gov.uk/weights-measures-and-packaging-the-law/sp... )

maxbaines•1h ago
Great minds...
graemep•1h ago
I did not know about the 35ml is OK too but not both on the same premises rule.
tialaramex•1h ago
The way they got to the 25/ 35 split involves even more craziness. In England the law said spirits are always measured in sixths of a gill. This entire unit is obsolete, but 1/6 is a tiny bit less than 25ml. Fine.

However in Scotland two sizes were common, a fifth of a gill (slightly more generous than England) and a "nip" or quarter of a gill (a lot more generous). If you're used to ordering a "nip" of something and now you get a lot less you'd be very angry! So the 35ml option is there for the kind of Scottish or Irish establishment which would have been used to these larger measures rather than either try to keep the gill (which is a stupid unit nobody else needs) or anger drunk people.

I wouldn't be surprised if the "Make a sign" difference was to allow licensed premises to gradually shift to the more profitable, smaller, size. Maybe you change the place you own in Glasgow to 25ml first, and if the locals don't kick off you can try Aberdeen next, otherwise try again in a few years.

maxbaines•1h ago
Agree this is a fact - we mark our glasses because of it. https://www.gov.uk/weights-measures-and-packaging-the-law/pr...
philipwhiuk•1h ago
I like the CAMRA ones which have the pint line below the rim of the glass. Because technically the head doesn't count as part of the pint and there's a lot of back-and-forth about what the legally acceptable amount of head really is (CAMRA say 0%, pub associations serve 5%, pubs themselves serve whatever they think you'll pay for).
gib444•53m ago
And they say England becoming low-trust is a recent change !
xnorswap•1h ago
I got poured a pint by a newbie behind the bar at a hotel recently and she looked embarrassed as it was about 40% head, but to her credit she went to fetch the shift supervisor before I said anything.

He explained after pouring it better that, even the remaining head (It had ~3/4 inch even after fixing it) might still be met by derision by many customers. "They'd be asking if you would be charging them for just for the half" etc.

There's a bit of leeway but you'll quickly hear about it if you short a pint too much.

post-it•1h ago
I'm not sure I understand, why didn't she just top it up?
dismalaf•1h ago
Right? Just top it up, let some of the foam cascade over the side... Foam always forms in the keg if it sits for too long so you need to let some of it out anyway.
xnorswap•1h ago
Who knows, she obviously lacked experience, I guess she just panicked or worried it might be an issue with the barrel rather than her pour?
vojtapol•1h ago
Yes. Americans/Canadians famously can't pour beer properly. If you are pouring a pilsner or really any lager, a head of at least 2 inches is actually correct and absolutely desirable. The way it's poured in Canada (no head) is borderline undrinkable to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dggKezrSQxI

masfuerte•1h ago
If an establishment wants to serve drinks with a head they should use glasses with a mark on the side indicating the measure, rather than glasses which need to be brim full. Using the latter style of glass and including a head is just ripping off the customer.
consp•1h ago
We call that kind of beer without any head "dead". Measurement here is about two fingers width, and if you do it the first time and screw up it is two fingers in length (second part is of course tounge-in-cheek).
skipants•1h ago
As a Canadian: hard agree. Beer without head is gross.
mb7733•54m ago
Preferences vary on both sides of the Atlantic. Another comment on this post complains that Americans pour beer wrong because they _do_ pour with a head.

> Also in the US (probably due to lack of training and the customer too embarrassed to complaining) tend not to fill it the brim (and so not even 16''). I've seen 2-3 inch heads and asked them to top it up. They look at me as if I've just insulted George Washington

secondcoming•50m ago
If I get a beer with no head I'm assuming the glass was dirty
bregma•5m ago
How do you measure the head through the red solo bubba cup?

Really, no self-respecting Canadian would drink beer out of anything except directly out of the bottle, can, or keg.

wodenokoto•1h ago
> 79.3% of pours were short (under 100% of claimed volume)

That is quite surprising. What breweries used to do when I worked in cafes and bars was to paint a mark on the glass and under it write "0.5" (in market that sells in liters and not in pints) and this mark is above[1] the half liter mark. Note that it is without units.

Pubs and bars get glasses for cheap or free and the brewery/distributor tries to trick the bar into selling more beer than they expect.

[1] We checked using measure cups from the kitchen. Maybe there is a conspiracy to have kitchens use too little ingredients.

ch_123•1h ago
In the UK and Ireland, a pint is 20 oz. (equivalent to just over 19 US ounces), so I always feel cheated by 16 oz. "pint" glasses in the US.
dghf•1h ago
This is why I get agitated when Americans claim to use imperial units. If they did, their pints would be the correct size.
cjs_ac•1h ago
Americans don't claim to use imperial weights and measures; they use customary weights and measures, which were also used in the UK prior to the creation of imperial units with the Weights and Measures Act 1824.
kube-system•1h ago
There are many people in America who do not know the difference, the mistake is fairly common.
bee_rider•17m ago
At this point they are just American units, right? Since the UK has upgraded already.
ZeWaka•12m ago
That's why we call it the US Customary System.
ascorbic•7m ago
Beer and cider are the only drinks that are legally not sold by metric volume in the UK. They have to be served by the pint, 2/3, 1/2 or 1/3. Every other drink has to use metric.
cjs_ac•6m ago
The origin of US Customary units is British, even if the US, Liberia and Myanmar are the last countries still using it. The UK has almost entirely adopted metric (yards and miles are still used for measuring distances on roads and pints are still used for milk and beer, and the last government made the eccentric decision to permit pints for wine, which no producer used because they couldn't get the bottles), but these systems of units have identities beyond whether or not they're in use anywhere.

EDIT/CORRECTION: Milk is sold in multiples of 568 mL, so while the quantities are pints, the measurement is metric.

alnwlsn•50m ago
The (incorrect) claim is indeed made in every single metric vs "imperial" comments section I've come across.
bryanrasmussen•1h ago
surely if that was the claim George Washington would never have had his dream

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqfVE-fykk

loeg•1h ago
It's not completely uncommon to be offered 16 oz or 20 oz as options in the US. But I see it more at "fast casual" restaurants than bars or more upscale restaurants.
cbm-vic-20•57m ago
And of course, what an "ounce" means may vary. According to Wikipedia "An imperial fluid ounce is defined in British law as exactly 28.4130625 millilitres, while a US customary fluid ounce is exactly 29.5735295625 mL, and a US food labelling fluid ounce is 30 mL."
vlod•1h ago
Also in the US (probably due to lack of training and the customer too embarrassed to complaining) tend not to fill it the brim (and so not even 16''). I've seen 2-3 inch heads and asked them to top it up. They look at me as if I've just insulted George Washington.
mcjiggerlog•1h ago
Well, depending on the type of beer, that's intentional. It's not always the faux-pas that it would be to do this when serving cask ale in the UK.
bardak•1h ago
But usually when that is the case they will use glassware that has a 20oz line on the glass with room for the head.
consp•1h ago
A pint in the Netherlands usually is 500ml. In very rare cases, but only in real pubs (not mass market "Irish" pubs) you get an actual pint. So you are cheated out of about ~68ml in that case. Vs the US you get a few ml more.
ch_123•1h ago
A standard US pint is about 473ml so a US pint is ~95ml less than an imperial pint.
thrance•50m ago
Same thing here in France. Except I've never seen any "real" pints here, it's always 50cl.
amiga386•48m ago
As far as I knew, Netherlands pubs typically sold:

- 200ml "fluitje" (little flute)

- 250ml "pintje" (little pint), often sold in a "vaasje" (vase, a tapered beer glass). This is the typical beer measure: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pintje "Het bestelde glas pils heeft doorgaans een inhoud van 25 cl"

They also sell standard bottled beer in 300ml and standard cans in 330ml: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standaardglas

I was not aware that 500ml was usual for the Netherlands. It is usual in, say, Germany, where they also sell the 1 litre Maß

jcul•31m ago
Do they actually call it a pint or just a half litre / large beer?

That's seems to be the norm in a lot of mainland Europe.

eduction•1h ago
Your pubs kindly return the favor when we order whiskey. As Hunter S Thompson is reported to have quipped in a bar your side of the Atlantic: "What is this, a sample?"
BoxOfRain•59m ago
That's fair, can't argue with that one.

Personally I'd have us use what the Royal Navy used to serve its rum ration in, the half-gill. This is 1/8 of a British pint or 71 millilitres, and the rum would have been a minimum of 54%!

Fractional gills were the pre-metric shot measure in the UK, but they were still pretty stingy. 1/6 gill in England, 1/5 or 1/4 gill in Scotland, and 1/4 gill in Northern Ireland.

dfawcus•1h ago
The volume of UK and US fluid ounces being different also doesn't help.

The UK pint is 568ml, apparently a US pint is 473 ml.

lbourdages•45m ago
It is the same in Canada [1] yet I frequently see beer sold in "US pints" over here. I assume they do it so they can advertise cheaper prices (the amount being smaller). Some places will write the glass size in ounces, but some won't.

It is one of my pet peeves for sure.

[1]: https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/measurement-canada/en/buyin...

lucideer•1h ago
I'm from Ireland, where filling beers precisely up to the brim is practically a religion, & many barmen will even take the glass back & top it up if they see the head diminishing too quickly in the space of time it takes you to pick the freshly poured pint up.

One thing that always struck me as odd is how the culture is seemingly the opposite of this in apparent beer meccas like Belgium - not only are the glasses typically much smaller (this is fine) but they also leave massive gaps at the top. The glass capacity is never treated as being close to the rim at all.

petesergeant•1h ago
The only sensible approach here is pint-to-line glasses. I don't want my glass filled to the very top where I'll spill it, I want it filled to the pint line. Sadly in the UK up to 5% of the pint is allowed to be foam, but I'd expect any sensible barman in the UK to top me up to the pint line if I asked, and be apologetic about it.
philipwhiuk•1h ago
Kind of.

Guinness glasses are exactly a pint, so the Guinness head means you're getting less than a pint of actual beer.

This is tolerated/expected and so de facto correct but de jure perhaps not.

dismalaf•1h ago
In Czech Republic they usually pour 3 fingers of head. But the measure line is also part way down the glass, the foam all above the line...
ahofmann•1h ago
I remember watching the cornetto trilogy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Flavours_Cornetto ) and always wondering why on earth they fill up the glasses up to the brim. It is uncomfortable to transport this way and not spill beer.
OJFord•1h ago
First sip's at the bar; then you can
fanf2•1h ago
When CAMRA was new in the early 1970s, they started a campaign for oversize glasses holding a pint to the line instead of a pint to the rim, so that there would be space for a pint of liquid and a head in the glass. The big breweries hated this idea and mounted a reactionary campaign arguing things like it would be too expensive to replace all the glasses, or serve customers the full measure they had paid for. (My father was a new recruit at Guinness and sadly one of his early tasks was the pint-to-brim campaign.)
pmh•1h ago
> not only are the glasses typically much smaller (this is fine) but they also leave massive gaps at the top

I'm wondering if this is due to the prevalence of cask ales vs bottle/keg conditioning. The former is relatively uncommon in Belgium and you want the head from the latter.

That said, oversized glassware (e.g. Duvel's tulip for aromatics) and/or fill lines are also used to accommodate the head while still not cheating the customer out of volume.

amonon•1h ago
My understanding is Belgian beer culture considers the aroma to be an important part of the experience. But I’ve never been, that’s all through osmosis.
calebelac•1h ago
Thanks for sharing! Glad to see there's some momentum behind this libatious tragedy
TheGRS•1h ago
I'll happily volunteer for this. I may have found my new purpose in life!
BashiBazouk•1h ago
Reminds me of backpacking up and down the east coast of Australia. I learned that Fosters is only northern New South Wales for beer. Every place had their own preferred beer, but maddeningly they all had their own glass. A tenner, a schooner. Each a slightly different size. I made friends with a guy in Hobart that was staying in the hostel as he was doing research there, I think he was a biologist. He took me to his favorite pub as they served imperial pints. I think who ever is behind this site needs to do some serious research in Australia as they could, at least, double the "know your glass" section...
mcbain•56m ago
You might enjoy the matrix of regional sizes and names on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Australia#Beer_glasses

No, us locals don't know them all either!

amonon•1h ago
Look, I get it. Beer is expensive, these days. Always has been. But I feel like these movements miss the forest for trees.

If we mandate beer volume then places that are “shorting” you will just raise the prices. Not to mention the tax on beer that would be required to pay for the inspection service. No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but there’s solution is to take your business elsewhere.

Also, you know what really annoys me? When a bartender pulls a pint for me, and it’s up to the brim with no foam. Foam is part of the joy of a crisp beer. It adds aroma and anticipation. If I wanted to drink something with no foam I’d drink a soda. And in my heart of hearts (or stomach if stomachs?) I fear that’s where these arguments lead.

roxolotl•1h ago
The solution is in other comments. In the EU glasses are etched with a fill line. Not filled to the mark? You complain.
amonon•1h ago
That seems very reasonable to me.
graemep•1h ago
> No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but there’s solution is to take your business elsewhere.

People need to know how much they got. it can be hard to judge, especially as you will be comparing across visits to different places on different days, and different styles of glass, etc.

Johnny555•1h ago
No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but without regulation, how do you know that you got less than you paid for unless you're going to carry around a measuring glass yourself?

If the places that were shorting you have to raise prices when they have to give you what you paid for, that's false economy -- you're not saving money, if you want to drink less beer to save money, ask for a smaller glass.

amonon•1h ago
I guess I feel the same way about that as I do about a steak. How do I know that the steak is the 16oz I ordered? Ultimately the most important part is if I found the experience satisfying enough to return, not whether the steak was within .5oz of its stated measurement.
Spivak•1h ago
I think your expected outcome is actually the desired one, to kill shrinkflation in favor of actual price increases. When the measures are all the same you can compare apples to apples across different businesses.
d--b•1h ago
As infuriating as it may be, it's a good occasion to learn to let go.

Rationally, you're paying way more than the liquid in the glass, so just mentally tell yourself that the haircut is included in the price, and that's fine. If you can't stand the price anyway, change bar.

You're there to chill. Just chill.

goosejuice•45m ago
I'm sure the same individuals will calculate tip to the cent as well.

As someone who worked in specialty foods for years, you get what you get. Flaws and all. That's part of the charm of this industry. This is especially true for small craft breweries. If you insist on accuracy then ask for a can/bottle list. If you insist on consistency then buy macro.

twodave•1h ago
Now this is what the Internet is really supposed to be about.
oldandboring•1h ago
I enjoyed reading this site and appreciate the passion and the effort.

The "loss of the pint" is basically shrink-flation. When a bar's costs and/or overhead goes up, they must do some combination of cutting expenses and raising prices. Raising prices means either selling the same stuff in the same quantity for more, or selling cheaper stuff OR less of the same stuff at the same price. Most bars will opt for the latter options to avoid raising prices, because raising prices is more likely to create complaints. All caveats apply, of course -- drop portions or quality too much or too often and you'll get complaints for sure, but "within reason" it's the lesser of two evils.

This is why I personally don't feel like I'm being cheated out of 2oz when I buy a $8 14oz shaker pint of IPA. Clearly, the cost per oz at this bar is $0.57. A 16oz glass would cost $9.14. They don't owe me the 2oz for free just because they used the word "pint". If the state government started enforcing pint measures again, bars would just drop the word "pint" from their signs and menus.

bee_rider•10m ago
Is it called a shaker pint for association with the famously restrained Shakers?
Forgeties79•40m ago
It’s such a small thing but when a brewery or restaurant featuring beers writes “pint” as an option and gives me a typical US beer glass (shaker I believe) it annoys the hell out of me. Don’t explicitly write “pint” if it isn’t at least north of 15oz. Definitely don’t if the glass literally can’t hold a pint.
goosejuice•34m ago
Wait until they discover cocktails.

Bickering over a few dollars when you're paying a premium price for the experience of going out is rather silly. There's better uses of your time, like enjoying yourself.

If you're not familiar with the mess that was nips: https://carolinas.eater.com/2015/10/16/9553903/mini-bottles-...

chaboud•17m ago
I've joked that the 16oz US pint was a long-play metric-system scheme to drive adoption of 500ml (~16.9oz) as a measure, a Pavlovian mechanic to trick beer-drinking Americans that the metric system is actually better because it results in more beer. The joke's on them. We're all about 12oz cans! 33cl? pfft...

Germans have it nailed down with the Kölsch Stange, a 200ml glass that so readily disappears that it stays cold and you just get another from the Kranz.

wolfi1•11m ago
no one drinks it that way, except for those who drive. and believe me, for half a litre in half an hour one yields an acceptable beer temperature