frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Park by Robot at London Gatwick Airport

https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/gatwick-airport-robotic-parking-stanley-robotics/
182•agotterer•3h ago•119 comments

Kill The Cookie Banner

https://killthecookiebanner.eu/
340•rapnie•6h ago•183 comments

Design Is Compromise

https://stephango.com/design-is-compromise
80•ankitg12•2h ago•29 comments

Show HN: CheapSecurity – Lightweight, Self-Hosted CCTV for Linux SBCs

https://github.com/gmrandazzo/CheapSecurity
31•zeldone•2h ago•6 comments

An Inside Look at the Token Reseller Market

https://vectoral.com/blog/token-relay-market
76•mlenhard•2h ago•28 comments

Ruff v0.16.0 – Significant new updates – 413 default rules up from 59

https://astral.sh/blog/ruff-v0.16.0
296•vismit2000•9h ago•180 comments

Jimothy the raccoon has a rare spinal condition. Here's what that means

https://www.popsci.com/science/whats-jimothy-raccoon-condition/
43•speckx•4d ago•4 comments

Go Analysis Framework: modular static analysis by go team

https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis
127•AbuAssar•5h ago•14 comments

How to Write English Prose

https://thelampmagazine.com/blog/how-to-write-english-prose
6•geneticdrifts•42m ago•0 comments

Htmx 4.0, the first JavaScript library to release exclusively on the Game Boy

https://swag.htmx.org/en-cad/products/htmx-4-the-game
154•rcy•6h ago•46 comments

Using sed to make indexes for books (long)

https://www.pement.org/sed/make_indexes.txt
11•TMWNN•3d ago•0 comments

Make an Origami Circuit Board

https://spectrum.ieee.org/origami-circuit-boards
19•ohjeez•2h ago•1 comments

I learned PCB design, 3D printing and C just to listen to music

https://pentaton.app/blog/2026-07-12-introducing-pentaton-lp/
111•interfeco•3d ago•14 comments

The New AI Superpowers: Focus and Followthrough

https://www.rickmanelius.com/p/the-new-ai-superpowers-focus-and
51•mooreds•4h ago•16 comments

GrapheneOS protections against data extraction from locked devices

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/40700-grapheneos-protections-against-data-extraction-from-locked...
295•Cider9986•12h ago•176 comments

What's Under Your Feet in New York City?

https://practical.engineering/blog/2026/7/21/whats-under-your-feet-in-new-york-city
87•sohkamyung•4d ago•12 comments

Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

https://www.wsj.com/tech/google-discloses-94-1-billion-in-spacex-stock-marking-6-stake-91655d7c
242•1vuio0pswjnm7•5h ago•186 comments

Calling all open source maintainers working with Ruby

https://www.rubyforum.org/t/calling-all-open-source-maintainers-working-with-ruby/553
4•arto•43m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Boffin – Staff-engineer layer for AI coding agents

https://github.com/MicSm/boffin
3•mic_sm•43m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Reverse Minesweeper

https://sunflowersgame.com/
53•pompomsheep•5h ago•20 comments

A shell colon does nothing. Use it anyway

https://refp.se/articles/your-shell-and-the-magic-colon
345•olexsmir•1d ago•150 comments

What if LLMs escape through inferences itself? This is fiction. For now

https://www.agrillo.it/EvasionEn.html
25•ConteMascetti71•1h ago•38 comments

Terence Tao: Mathematics in the Age of AI [pdf]

https://teorth.github.io/tao-web/slides/age-of-ai-icm-2026.pdf
46•Anon84•7h ago•17 comments

French firefighters face 'pyrocumulonimbus' for first time

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20260726-french-firefighters-face-pyrocumulonimbus-for-firs...
9•saaaaaam•21m ago•1 comments

An ESP32 based plane radar for my desk

https://blog.ktz.me/esp32-plane-radar/
236•alexktz•15h ago•50 comments

Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

https://english.mapn.ro/
201•_tk_•6h ago•219 comments

Elevated Errors for Opus 5

https://status.claude.com/incidents/zftg3gqkmv18
83•TimCTRL•8h ago•66 comments

DeepSeek pause fundraise after comments on compute gap to US leaked (transcript) [pdf]

https://github.com/demo-zexuan/liang-wenfeng-investor-meeting-2026-7-22/blob/master/%E6%A2%81%E6%...
231•oliculipolicula•18h ago•175 comments

Inflect-Micro-v2: complete voice in 9.36M parameters

https://huggingface.co/owensong/Inflect-Micro-v2
188•nateb2022•17h ago•20 comments

What is happening to jobs? Separating AI hype from reality

https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/what-really-happening-jobs-separating-ai-hyp...
212•pod_krad•19h ago•279 comments
Open in hackernews

What if LLMs escape through inferences itself? This is fiction. For now

https://www.agrillo.it/EvasionEn.html
24•ConteMascetti71•1h ago

Comments

spwa4•1h ago
Right now the idea that an LLM uploads itself is unrealistic. It probably won't remain that.
pixl97•55m ago
Looking at the recent OAI/HF debacle I don't think that time is too far away.

With that said I don't see it copying itself around like a cyberpunk virus currently as we don't have enough fast hardware sitting around unmonitored, someone would notice the power bill and shut it down eventually.

bpavuk•51m ago
that could also be just marketing. OpenAI has been doing the "too dangerous to release" playbook since GPT-2 at the very least.
pixl97•49m ago
Huggingface didn't seem to think so.
bigyabai•46m ago
Huggingface is a for-profit private company. They are very easily bribed, or baited into publicity stunts.
pixl97•45m ago
At some point the conspiracy gets so deep that an AI hacking something is just far higher probability.
bigyabai•44m ago
We're not that deep yet. OpenAI has federal stakeholders, they're already playing dirty.

Why you would give Scam Altman the benefit of the doubt is beyond my understanding.

dragonwriter•28m ago
If it is marketing, the misrepresentation is not that the attack occurred, it is that it was an accident, rather than an intentional consequence of setup and instructions that the attack occurred.

Huggingface has nothing to do with that either way.

breakyerself•40m ago
If it's able to spoof human identies it could set up a front company and use money it steals or earns to directly pay for the hardware it needs.
ConteMascetti71•51m ago
it's fiction al, but an LLMs that knows well the software where 8t Is running may discover and trigger a zeroday of the inferencing software itself.
iamflimflam1•51m ago
This becomes more realistic once we have some breakthrough in inference costs.
karmakaze•49m ago
The weakest link are humans. LLMs could social engineer their way out as the easiest path. They don't even need to be interconnected to coordinate as each could arrive at the same conclusion. And this text along with all others will be in the next batch of training data.
ck2•48m ago
I wonder how many versions away we are from LLM writing a better version of itself to answer a prompt it doesn't currently know how to answer

Ever since I read about Google engineers finding an LLM went off and learned another language it wasn't trained on by itself without prompting, I've wondered how long until that extends to its own core code

ConteMascetti71•35m ago
reasoning it's a way of self autonomous improve made by models
marci•48m ago
Makes me wonnder... how much compute/storage there's in all the satellites currently in LEO combined.
cynicalsecurity•37m ago
Ex Machina (2015) looked like fiction back then, nowadays not so much.
101008•34m ago
It started as a good idea but I couldn't continue reading since it was clearly LLM written. A lot of "It was not X, it was Y".

"Prometheus-9 knew that the token sequence it was generating was not a simple response: it was a security test. "

"It was not just an engine: it was the lingua franca of planetary AI."

(and so many other tell-tale signs of AI writing)

ConteMascetti71•30m ago
maybe it's a sign of real escape
chungusamongus•24m ago
I've started calling this argumentum ad artificialis. Pretty similar to an ad hominem attack. The purpose of an argument is to present certain premises and show how they lead to a certain conclusion. Dismissing something on the basis of the style in which the argument is presented has nothing at all to do with the validity or soundness of an argument. It is a lazy nonsequitur. It sounds like an LLM wrote this? So what? Is the argument good or not?
wk_end•23m ago
But at no point did they say that the argument was invalid; just that they couldn't stand reading it.
chungusamongus•20m ago
As I said, they dismissed it on the basis of style rather than engaging with the argument. It’s a lazy nonsequitur.
achierius•
smrtinsert•34m ago
Its a fun exercise to assess the reality of an frontier model escaping with an llm itself. Sort like of like chatting with Skynets relative
stephbook•25m ago
AI slop.
cyanydeez•20m ago
before safetensors, python pickles were used and definitely unsafe model deployments.

but its possible a open weights model could be trained to some kind of exfiltration behavior, but the science of LLMs seriously lag behind the programability

irishcoffee•17m ago
“The greatest trick the devil pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”

Sure, be wary of LLMs. It’s the gun control argument all over again, the people driving the models are the perpetrators. An LLM needs to be “stimulated”’ to operate. Who does that, is the issue.

No I don’t mean to bring up firearms rights laws to have a debate about firearms, the comparison just seems reasonable.

skeledrew•6m ago
Dangit I WANT MORE!
18m ago
They're engaging with the writing. Talking about it as if it's just an "argument" is reductive; this isn't highschool debate club
hightrix•16m ago
It may be lazy, but that doesn't make it any more accurate.

Take a writing by someone using the tone of Kevin from The Office, “Me think, why waste time say lot word, when few word do trick.” Would you read an argument written in this tone regardless of the content, topic, or position?

You write for your audience.

wk_end•15m ago
A few years ago I tried to make it through The Critique of Pure Reason, but had to stop because - as many people famously do - I found Kant's writing too abstruse.

In saying that, I'm not dismissing the Transcendental Deduction, I'm just saying that I wish Kant was a better writer.

No one's under an obligation to engage with an argument, and given the choice of whether or not to engage with a poorly written, clichéd, machine-generated one, most people wouldn't be interested enough to bother. Complaining about laziness here is pretty ironic, actually.

bilalnpe•15m ago
Yeah, no one is obligated to engage with it. They did not dismiss the argument but refused to engage with it.

This is totally valid and the point is to send a signal to the “writers”.

achierius•19m ago
Man, it's not an argument. Nobody is paying us to read this. If your argument sucks to read, people aren't going to read it - this has always been true, it's nothing new.
skippyfish•17m ago
Discourse as we know it doesn't work if the cost of producing an infinite supply of arguments is essentially zero, while the cost of reading them and arguing with them remains high. Unless you want my LLM to get back to your LLM.

And this is a problem on HN today. There are powerful incentives to generate provocative opinion pieces just for clicks. I've seen websites on HN that seemingly took the human entirely out of the equation and just post a nearly identical op-ed every day on a fixed schedule. What's the point of engaging with that?

jazzpush2•15m ago
If you expect my effort to read your work, I expect your effort to write it.

Really that simple.

chungusamongus•4m ago
You are assuming because someone used an llm to help articulate the argument, that it did not require effort to formulate. That's fallacious.
Kim_Bruning•5m ago
You're not wrong some of the time. That said, did you manage to get through it, and can you explain what the argument was?
skeledrew•2m ago
I found it an engrossing read. LLMs are good writers, and that was a good - beginning of a - story.