That and all things being equal I suspect most of the people in these groups would rather not be fighting.
This is not your usual vigilante group. This is a reaction to an overwhelming force of criminal gangs killing citizens and the government being powerless to stop them.
Right now these people are just doing whatever they can to survive but it's just treating the symptom. The source of the problem is the Mexican government who is either incompetent or happy to take bribes to look the other way while their citizens are left the mercy of paramilitary gangs.
At some point when your government is so corrupt, you got to take weapon and organize yourself. It's sad.
The US absolutely has an interest in the destruction of Mexican cartels.
I don't mind bombing the cartels from a distance. I'd rather the U.S. continues to pursue diplomatic options vs. war.
Drug problems in Mexico are a result of issues here in the US. Cartels were inconsequential when I was a teenager but gained power as the War on Drugs ramped up. If you are naive enough to believe that smugglers bypassed all those border protections in a cat-and-mouse game against detection for decades then you should understand the reality. In real life it was wealthy Americans and elements of the government who funded the import of drugs across the border using a network of private airstrips and small community airstrips that were unmanned most of the time. Shipments came through when "the coast is clear" and were dispersed across the US with the assistance of local people who were happy to help because they got paid. Many of these people were prominent in their communities and made appropriate donations to political interests which gave them the ability to remain in the background, unmolested by law enforcement, even from the federal level agencies.
Many of you young people have spent parts of your lives experimenting with drugs that currently are illegal and wishing that you could just walk into Walmart and buy it OTC. You wish laws would change to make it easier for you to use your drug of choice. Many people my age have been in the background, paranoid all their lives that someone - an employer maybe - would discover that they took a few tokes or got busted way back when and occasionally today. There is too much money in drugs being illegal for wholesale legalization to happen. That business is too big to fail. Those who are benefiting now and who have benefited over the last decades would lose a valuable income stream and all y'all HN types who spend hours prompting your AIs to create new SaaS apps understand income streams so you know how it sucks to have to conjure new prompts because your old ones flopped or were found to be too predatory.
I think as Americans we bear most of the responsibility for the formation of these cartels and for their continued dominance in so much of Mexico's economy.
tejohnso•44m ago
I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.
monkaiju•40m ago
cwnyth•25m ago
eth0up•11m ago
14•3m ago
tejohnso•5m ago
tejohnso•7m ago
Use whatever words you want but I think that's clearly violent and it's clearly a gang, which by definition is "a group of persons working together" or even more specifically, "a group of persons working to unlawful or antisocial ends". In this case the newly formed gang is certainly unlawful.
inigyou•40m ago
arjie•38m ago
gibbitz•18m ago
cucumber3732842•16m ago
threatofrain•14m ago
zhoBEENG•3m ago
It started with the debt crisis, and its causes, but was definitively realized by 1994 when the Zapatistas took much of Chiapas.
Too much emphasis is put on the drug cartels alone, when the problem is much larger. I suspect by the end of the century maps will no longer show Mexico in its current form. I think they should already be updated for areas like Chiapas, to reflect the reality on the ground.