frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

England set to be one of the first countries to eliminate hepatitis C

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75gk620r22o
70•stevekemp•1h ago•34 comments

France to ban unsolicited telemarketing calls

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2026/08/06/france-to-ban-unsolicited-telemarketing-calls...
571•aziaziazi•5h ago•317 comments

As AI eats the web, the internet’s collective memory is disappearing

https://thewalrus.ca/google-search-is-dying/
502•awnird•15h ago•578 comments

H3-metal – Native MiniMax-H3 inference for Apple Silicon

https://github.com/antirez/h3.c
348•swyx•12h ago•76 comments

It's time Amazon played by the same rules as everyone else [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91DoiansHqk
64•whosgotch•52m ago•28 comments

How to organize Claude Code for product work

https://www.theaithinker.com/p/how-to-organize-claude-code-for-product
22•adamfaik•2h ago•12 comments

Nvidia's Risky Business

https://stratechery.com/2026/nvidias-risky-business/
40•jonbaer•3h ago•6 comments

Immersion lithography saved Moore's Law (2023)

https://www.asml.com/en/company/stories/2023/how-immersion-lithography-saved-moores-law
12•wsgeorge•4d ago•0 comments

Chicken Scheme 6.0

https://code.call-cc.org/releases/6.0.0/NEWS
237•eatonphil•13h ago•32 comments

Show HN: Needle2: 14MB agentic LLM for phones, wearables, smart home and robots

https://cactuscompute.com/needle
412•HenryNdubuaku•20h ago•150 comments

Mark Zuckerberg attacks 'closed' AI rivals as Meta returns to open models

https://www.ft.com/content/4e3957f8-ea7c-4c46-a3de-cdce8e526878
554•root-parent•23h ago•518 comments

Show HN: Scroll through all 43252003274489856000 Rubik's Cube states

https://everycube.alen.is/
238•Alen123•14h ago•80 comments

LFM2.5 2.6B model competitive with 4x larger models

https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B
105•nateb2022•6d ago•31 comments

What I learned by putting GitHub Copilot behind a MitM proxy

https://www.lighthousenewsletter.com/p/i-put-github-copilot-behind-a-mitm
16•j0selit0•3h ago•2 comments

Closing Canario Terminal source code

https://rapha.land/closing-canario-terminal-source-code/
26•atan2•5h ago•32 comments

More than 10 firms pay up to $100k a month for access to Truth Social posts

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3q5nxpgk1o
145•whosgotch•3h ago•141 comments

How Claude marks AI-generated content

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content
266•mfiguiere•16h ago•232 comments

The “mechanical miracle” that ruined Mark Twain’s life

https://resobscura.substack.com/p/the-mechanical-miracle-that-ruined
163•benbreen•5d ago•85 comments

Stowaway – Take the window seat on any plane or satellite overhead

https://stowaway.live/
328•thunderbong•4d ago•40 comments

Recycle – Floppydisks

https://www.floppydisk.com/recycle
85•calvinmorrison•11h ago•36 comments

Sonic Pi v5

https://www.patreon.com/samaaron/posts/sonic-pi-v5-166001392
398•samaaron•4d ago•96 comments

Faster floating point math with Rust's new API

https://pythonspeed.com/articles/faster-float-math-rust/
64•subset•5d ago•17 comments

To Save C, We Must Save ABI (2022)

https://thephd.dev/to-save-c-we-must-save-abi-fixing-c-function-abi
94•gurjeet•3d ago•90 comments

The UK's war on anonymity has come to America

https://www.effort.news/uk-lobby
564•slowin•14h ago•594 comments

Rust SIMD on the GPU

https://www.vectorware.com/blog/simd-on-gpu/
201•sagacity•19h ago•96 comments

Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-NVFP4
5•beklein•27m ago•0 comments

Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

https://research.meta.ai/blog/introducing-muse-glimmer-open-agentic-model
1142•riordan•1d ago•615 comments

Hollywood and Shanghai Cinema in the 1930s [pdf]

https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2225&context=clcweb
6•Bluestein•5d ago•0 comments

Confessions of a Long-Distance Sailor

https://arachnoid.com/lutusp/sailbook.html
140•AntiRush•17h ago•45 comments

Tail-call optimization in C is relatively recent (2025)

https://lwn.net/Articles/1034703/
156•prakashqwerty•1d ago•136 comments
Open in hackernews

More than 10 firms pay up to $100k a month for access to Truth Social posts

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3q5nxpgk1o
139•whosgotch•3h ago

Comments

jdw64•58m ago
I pay a dollar here and there to promote my homepage so people will actually see it. I guess being a president really helps. I wish people would just pay a dollar to read my posts someday
yourusername•55m ago
If your posts induce wild swings in the stock market i'll pay a dollar to read them a minute early.
jdw64•54m ago
I can't swings the stock market, but maybe I could change people's values...? That's too bad. It's a little sad to think my writing isn't even worth a dollar, haha.
coreyh14444•57m ago
The most corrupt US administration in history and it isn't even close.
eterm•51m ago
It is completely unimaginable in comparison to previous administrations. Pre-trump, even just pre-2025 Trump, this would read like a parody of corruption.
jdw64•48m ago
Who knows? Maybe we'll see a new 'worst in history' every year from now on
HumblyTossed•35m ago
It's possible. The ultra-wealthy now have a blue print to follow.
raincole•28m ago
And the least corrupt US administration from now on.
kubafu•51m ago
Official "insider-knowledge-as-a-service". No surprise who the first clients are.
Toutouxc•49m ago
Insider trading as a service. No one is going to take the US seriously for the next 50 years.
Waterluvian•45m ago
Or possibly ever again. Eras like this one can be what kills an empire/great power.

I think one of the greater risks to a power like the U.S. is getting old enough where it's felt like things always were, and therefore always will be. When there is no-longer a grandparent at the dinner table who can even tell you when his grandparent at the dinner table spoke about the before times.

rubyfan•41m ago
Right, the fact that the current administration had a 4 year hiatus only extended this period. Think about all the young people that grew up with this as normal.
reactordev•31m ago
Reinforced by the Parnas', Lambert's, Kirk's and Loomer's on TikTok. Ready to vote in the next midterms. Thinking 9/11 was an inside job...
jebarker•41m ago
> Eras like this one can be what kills an empire/great power.

Is there actually any good analogue for this era that caused a previous empire or great power to collapse?

ceejayoz•30m ago
morkalork•47m ago
$100k seems cheap for the potential front running
InsideOutSanta•37m ago
The amount of money you can make with this only depends on how much money you already have.
criddell•31m ago
Even if the front running fails, it's a cheap way to raise your profile with the president. I bet if you are paying $100k / month, your chances of the president taking your call go way up.
podgietaru•47m ago
A bribe.
micw•45m ago
Why is this not being stopped by us jurisdiction? Or at least why does the rest of the world does not decouple from those markets?
jasonjayr•33m ago
Hint: You will never see the folks enforcing action against this platform and the folks using and posting on the platform in the same room.
bamboozled•31m ago
They are decoupling, it's just if you just do it quietly.
mapt•27m ago
A video has been going around pointing out one of the consequences of the Strait of Hormuz closure.

Over the past few years, China has quietly purchased more than a billion barrels of oil from Russia and Iran at a discount in CNY rather than USD, pushing it into newly created strategic stockpiles that would be necessary for closure of a different Strait. After putting a strategic foot on the neck of refined product exports, they are now functionally acting as the largest part of the world's crude reserves, smoothing demand so that the global price does not spike and crash the global economy & global trade. If China was to keep up its normal buying cycle over the past few months, we would have easily seen >$200 oil. Instead, oil is a third that, and it's not even the limiting factor - refinery output drops on diesel from Ukraine's Kinetic Sanctions campaign are having a more significant bottleneck on petrochemicals right now than Hormuz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkA0bkb6ZO0

Say what you like about the motivation, this is a form of global leadership of the sort that America used to specialize in, and every drop of oil traded in CNY rather than "The Petrodollar" weakens the USD as the anchor currency.

TrackerFF•41m ago
Why would anyone want to pay that much for something, unless it gives them some edge.

I don't know if it is still a thing, but in the world of penny stocks and crypto there used to be subscription pump and dump channels, where influencers would charge $x / month, and coordinate pumps. "Signal" channels, as they were named.

This can't be too different. If not even more straight forward insider stuff.

Either that, or it is just another way to bribe your way closer to Trump.

Business idea for Trump: Sell access to his Truth Social posts, but bake in some latency. Those that pay most, will get to see the posts first (via API). Then after X minutes of posting the posts will go live for everyone to see. How fast you want to see the post between publishing and public access, depends on how much you want to pay. The less latency, the more you need to pay.

DougN7•38m ago
I’m sure you could make a ton of money on oil if you had a 30 minute heads up about whether Trump was going to bomb Iran or not on any given day.
salomonk_mur•35m ago
A 1 second head start is good enough.
101008•30m ago
Completely ignorant here, and I don't want to ask an AI (I don't trust them on these issues). Could you give me an example how you can make money with this information?

Again, question as someone who doens't live in the US so I am not used how you can profit from this. I guess it may be because a war may impact the market and you can invest (or the opposite) with this, but in my mind bombing Iran wouldn't move the market by much (the consequences would, but by then everyone is on the same page).

Thank you!

ImHereToVote•40m ago
I don't think anyone would have predicted that Karl Marx would ever end up being as vindicated as he turned out to be.
yonaguska•39m ago
huh?
AndrewAndrewsen•36m ago
Read Marx, he predicted so many things that would happen during the late stage capitalism phase.
cassepipe•14m ago
And yet he gave us nothing in terms of what alternative economic would look like apart from a "a free association of workers" or something. Turns out it's a hard problem.
ImHereToVote•10m ago
Marx couldn't probably come up with a solution in the 19th century. That was far too early. Luckily Deng appeared with the solution.
stochastic-parr•34m ago
Except most marxists.
Levitz•31m ago
The degree to which his works have been dragged through the mud by a bunch of people who insist on calling everything they don't like "capitalism" can't be overstated. The majority of people complaining about capitalism don't even have a coherent definition of it, it's a disgrace.
AndrewAndrewsen•35m ago
Capitalism implodes on itself, just as predicted..
patrickmay•29m ago
This isn't capitalism, it's pure corruption.
spiderfarmer•15m ago
Capitalism prescribes a limited role of government, to protect the rights of private citizens and maintain an orderly environment that facilitates proper functioning of markets.

This isn’t capitalism, it’s pure unfettered and uncontrolled greed.

nancyminusone•7m ago
"that wasn't real capitalism" hmm, where have I heard that before?
grey-area•35m ago
Corruption.
Aurornis•34m ago
When I first heard saw headlines about this I thought it was so outlandish that it couldn’t possibly be real. Yet here we are.

It’s amazing how much corruption is occurring for so little money. A million dollars a month is peanuts for such clear graft.

amazingamazing•33m ago
Even before this insiders had access to the prez. I am glad this presidency is making very apparent the inherent flaws with the US government.
acomjean•25m ago
A teleprompter operator was making bets on what the president would say..

And thats just one that got called out. Grift is kind of the new normal sadly.

https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/07/trump-teleprompter-a...

I remember someone getting into trouble for taking a trips in government vehicles. A time when scandal would cause people to stop being in politics...Seems quaint.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-06-23-mn-2062-s...

spiderfarmer•14m ago
What is your point exactly?
Lendal•32m ago
If a rival political party takes power in 2029 and they decide to do nothing about this, are they complicit?

If the cops drive past a mugging, observe, and then drive on past allowing the law to go unenforced, are they not just as corrupt as the robbers?

wildrhythms•30m ago
Yes
lotsofpulp•28m ago
Rival party is not equivalent to the cops.

Even if the rival party were to somehow control all 3 branches of government (which they will not), the voting records show a full 1/3 of American adults outright support this corruption (many of the cops themselves), and another 1/3 are willing to ignore it.

If you are in the 1/3 that does care about it, you are not going to have a good time trying to fight the other 1/3, many of whom make up the “law and order” department.

So the answer to both questions is a resounding no, because the world is more complicated than a comic book superhero movie.

s_dev•26m ago
Was the Union army complicit in the crimes of the Confederacy by simply allowing them to drop their arms and walk away as well? The world is complicated and full of nuanced takes depending on context. That said:

>If a rival political party takes power in 2029 and they decide to do nothing about this, are they complicit?

Like this really does read as: I still blame the Democrats for the crimes of the Republicans.

The ultimate authority here is the US voters and they have chosen poorly again and again. They are complicit for sure as they chose both to empower Republicans and tie the hands of the Democrats with impossible standards.

BryantD
koe123•30m ago
Curious: are there any republicans left on HN? I have no concept of how you can defend this
toomuchtodo•26m ago
https://www.daynaemcraig.com/narcissistsprayer/

“That didn’t happen. And if it did, it wasn’t that bad. And if it was, that’s not a big deal. And if it is, that’s not my fault. And if it was, I didn’t mean it. And if I did You deserved it.”

DaSHacka•22m ago
Borderline direct quote from Fauci during the trials these past weeks lol
jazzypants•6m ago
No one is talking about Fauci here. This kind of whataboutism is frankly disgusting.
ratelimitsteve•21m ago
i suspect that, much like the rest of the world, HN has had a sharp increase in people who "don't do politics"
spiderfarmer•10m ago
In my experience only people from the US are afraid to exercise their freedom of speech when conversing with friends, family and colleagues.
dayvid•30m ago
It's not even that much money for the reputational damage. Wild.
Carrok•28m ago
What reputation?
baggachipz•23m ago
Yes because Truth Social and its owner/head troll both had a stellar reputation to begin with.
ratelimitsteve•25m ago
we've reached the "yes, we're cheating, do something about it" stage of corruption
mrweasel•24m ago
Functionally I suppose it's the same thing, but are they paying for access to Truth Social, or early access to Trumps posts?

Are there anything else of "value" on Truth Social. I haven't signed up for Truth Social, but is there actually anything else going on, besides Trumps post. Would any company have any reason to be on the platform, if Trump wasn't?

mapt•15m ago
They are paying for early access to Trump's posts.

The first post they received after this system was turned on, was Trump literally posting "GREEN CANDLES. BEAUTIFUL GREEN CANDLES!!!"

This is an informal stock market term for asset values having a good day (or good minute, for that matter), with stock movements measured on a "Candlestick chart". This is a... not an admission, but a brag, that this is in fact an insider trading service, and that people who follow this insider trading service are going to make a lot of money. This is Trump announcing that he has rigged the stock market and you need to buy in right this moment if you want to remain competitive.

I am cautiously optimistic about this in some ways? Historically, the one thing you do not do in America is touch the money. There's now a hundred trillion dollars of capital that have an incentive for the lights to go out in the White House and to turn back on with JD Vance in a different seat.

tho23u434079•18m ago
I'm surprised this isn't an impeachable offence.
zparky•13m ago
not like that impacts anything anymore, apparently.
dole•7m ago
I remember when we gave a shit about "emoluments."
spiderfarmer•6m ago
It is.

The US is over.

beams_of_light•7m ago
I think most of us who have lived through many presidents understood that there was a decency required of the holder of the office that acted as the only true limit on their corruption. It's confounding that so many people in the US can't see it for what it is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empi...

> The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army (check), the health and numbers of the Roman population (check), the strength of the economy (check), the competence of the emperors (check), the internal struggles for power (check), the religious changes of the period (check), and the efficiency of the civil administration (check). Increasing pressure from invading peoples outside Roman culture (check) also contributed greatly to the collapse. Climatic changes (check) and both endemic and epidemic diseases (check) drove many of these immediate factors.

A_D_E_P_T•21m ago
You could look even earlier. There are a lot of similarities between Trump's style and Emperor Commodus's. And to paraphrase Cassius Dio, Commodus took an empire of gold and transformed it into one of iron and rust.

Every time I hear people praise the stoic Emperor Marcus Aurelius I am reminded of the fact that he failed in his most important duty: To plan well for his succession.

leereeves•21m ago
The two worst Roman emperors ruled hundreds of years before the fall: Caligula from 37 to 41 CE, Nero from 54 to 68 CE.

Not many people could name, or recognize the name of, any emperor from the last hundred years of the Western Roman Empire.

So I don't think Rome is a good analogue for the suggestion that the Trump era is going to kill the USA.

ceejayoz•19m ago
Sure. We had Nixon.

Most collapses start slow, and I tend to doubt this one is finished.

Waterluvian•15m ago
I expect things to actually get better by some measures for a little while as the U.S. liquidates its holdings of international political and socioeconomic influence. A sort of short-lived glut from voluntary cannibalization.
c7b•11m ago
The decline of the Roman Empire, depending on how you define it, played out over centuries, if not a millennium. It is such a bad analogy for the kind of within-our-lifetimes collapse that is being speculated about here that it undermines the original concern. The decline of Germany as the leading scientific powerhouse in the first half if the 20th century would be a better case study imho.
ceejayoz•7m ago
> The decline of the Roman Empire, depending on how you define it, played out over centuries, if not a millennium.

Sure, and before COVID-19 pandemics often took years/decades to spread around the globe. Agriculture took thousands of years to develop; iPhones were invented twenty years ago.

Things move faster in a world of eight billion people who can get anywhere on the planet in 24 hours.

jebarker•7m ago
This is not convincing. Many of these are debatable when you actually pull apart what is meant then and now. But there’s also a long list of things that are different about the Roman Empire and US (and the world) today.
thm•32m ago
Great podcast on this: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0XqYCQT4PgD3axPy0w5Wcd He calls this category certainty.
gchamonlive•32m ago
In most areas (drug enforcement, basic education, healthcare, gun culture...) nobody should have been taking the US seriously maybe since Reagan. Finance, science and war were the only areas you could count on the US but now they went full Roman on the rest of the world not even that anymore. War is the only thing that's left I think.
gota•26m ago
The US also arguably lost the Iran war. So far it can't claim any minor fraction of a victory, at least; seems to be the general consensus.

I like to read Bret Devereaux (from the frequently HN posted https://acoup.blog/) takes on this in his Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/bretdevereaux.bsky.social)

gchamonlive•24m ago
It doesn't win wars, but it provides the necessary equipment for carnage and stalemates all over the globe. Remember war is just a pretext, the objective is always profit, so as long as a lost war is very profitable it's a success in their books.
dylan604•12m ago
If everyone has the same conclusion, how is it an argument? Nobody thinks the US won in Iran except the morons that started it. Maybe bigOil feels like its a win as their profits are soaring???
realusername•24m ago
> War is the only thing that's left I think

I would have agreed until the Iran war, the US used up so much of the missile stock that even the army isn't fully intact anymore

gchamonlive•22m ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49257982
dgellow•22m ago
> nobody should have been taking the US seriously maybe since Reagan. Finance, science and war were the only areas you could count on the US

That was plenty of reasons to take the country seriously! Also, the US has been the most powerful cultural exporter for a very long time. It’s still the case, whenever anything becomes huge in the US we get our local version in each European countries. Our far right parties are parroting American right politics, even copying the terminology as is

gchamonlive•19m ago
Have you seen the state of AAA gaming and blockbusters lately? Even music is being utterly destroyed by the streaming platforms and record labels greed, so yeah it might have been in the 80s up until the 2010s, but enshitification got the best of the US I'm afraid so not even culture anymore. It's just decacence.

It's not all US, but as you said things start in the US and trickles down across the rest of the world, so that's also true for its decadence.

Aurornis•25m ago
> No one is going to take the US seriously for the next 50 years.

I hate this obvious pay-for-access thing as much as anyone, but this isn’t going to define the US for the next 50 years. The second the next president is in office every other country will adapt to working with them, just as been happening every 4-8 years.

ceejayoz•24m ago
The American population has demonstrated that they'll nominate an insane criminal to power at random. Twice! I think that's gonna stick longer than the Bush to Clinton style transitions.
Aurornis•21m ago
I’m talking about the people with decision making power and the businesses working internationally. I have no doubt that certain individuals in other countries will be holding grudges against the United States for the rest of their lives long after the country has moved on, but it doesn’t really have any effect. If you’ve spent some time traveling the world every country has older generations who have some grudge against other countries for events that happened prior to most people being born and the younger generations don’t care. The world changes and most people move on.
ceejayoz•16m ago
> I’m talking about the people with decision making power and the businesses working internationally.

As am I.

At a certain point, you get bitten enough times that you decide the angry cobra isn't a great pet. It may be really cool, sometimes! But sometimes it hurts you, a lot.

> If you’ve spent some time traveling the world every country has older generations who have some grudge against other countries for events that happened prior to most people being born and the younger generations don’t care.

Some end this way, sure.

For an alternative, see Gaza.

hgoel•16m ago
They're also talking about decision makers. They're going to operate with the consideration that Americans might elect another mad man. Anything requiring more than one presidential term's time will be much more carefully hedged.
ricardobeat•13m ago
The people with power put this government in place. The point is that there might be no “moving on” from here, just a new normal.
CaptainZapp•16m ago
> The second the next president is in office every other country will adapt to working with them, just as been happening every 4-8 years.

That may well be, with one big difference.

Nobody and no country will trust the US or their commitments ever again.

Aurornis•10m ago
> Nobody and no country will trust the US or their commitments ever again.

How do you explain all of the people and countries who are currently trusting the US and their commitments?

This is always a strange belief to hold when the current evidence is so overwhelming against it. The rest of the world and the people making decisions know that this administration will come to an end. Something about each new headline convinced a small number of people that this one event is actually the end of the entire country for the next 50 years, against all visible evidence

ceejayoz•4m ago
> How do you explain all of the people and countries who are currently trusting the US and their commitments?

You've never seen a crime flick where the soon-to-be-murdered victim goes "I won't call the cops, I swear! Don't hurt me!"

Who's genuinely trusting US commitments right now? Our most stalwart allies sent troops to Greenland as a tripwire force! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Arctic_Endurance

whywhywhywhy•22m ago
If insider trading is your concern then the country hasn't been serious for a long time, everyone in government does it and it's never punished even when exploited to the levels of 9 figures of assets.

Should just be legalized at this point so we can all take advantage if they're all gonna get away with it.

chinathrow•20m ago
> Should just be legalized at this point so we can all take advantage if they're all gonna get away with it.

Is this satire?

stuaxo•19m ago
I fear not, look at which website we are on.
A_D_E_P_T•19m ago
> everyone in government does it and it's never punished even when exploited to the levels of 9 figures of assets.

Statements like this are worthless without examples. Surely you can provide some? Hard mode: Don't mention Pelosi or Clinton.

micromacrofoot•10m ago
The messed up part is that it's not even technically insider trading as long as they release the same information publicly shortly after... so they're not actually breaking any laws. So much of the way the US government has operated is based on some shared standard of moral sense that the current administration lacks completely.
owebmaster•23m ago
The answer is simple: the US is corrupt.
Aurornis•27m ago
Iran controls the straight of Hormuz, which is a key shipping channel for the world. It being open or not has an impact on all businesses which have to ship through it, which is a lot of them. Therefore it impacts the entire economy. The entire stock market goes up or down based on signals about the status of the war.
ceejayoz•27m ago
> Completely ignorant here, and I don't want to ask an AI (I don't trust them on these issues). Could you give me an example how you can make money with this information?

Place a Kalshi bet on the outcome of something that a Truth Social post just settled?

Short a company he's about to bash?

tstenner•24m ago
Trump bombs Iran -> oil price goes up. You buy oil futures before the bombing and get the price difference paid out.
dana-s•20m ago
I'm also not the most smart there but there's this market thing of "futures", where I can say I'll buy 10 barrels for 10$ next month, then I can sell the "10 barrels for 10$" to others, if I know offer will be lower due wars, one can buy now and sell once it's lower, if it's going to have higher availability(or expectation of so), then there's those future things.
owebmaster•19m ago
The answer is so obvious that you should try to figure it out by yourself as an exercise to avoid cognitive decline in the age of AI. Seriously.
HolyLampshade•36m ago
If I had to venture a guess (and full disclosure I’m not currently working in the space, and am not privy to conversations about actually buying this product), the 100k/m for whatever the contract duration is relatively low stakes to see if there’s utility in the data. Since there is no historical data the only real option is to buy, see if it makes a difference, and dump the product at the end of the contract if it doesn’t move the needle.

The seller is trying to push upfront sales by suggesting “These guys are doing it, and if you want to keep an edge you need to too”, (and journalists wanting to write about how corrupt this shit is are eagerly picking this up and boosting the signal by writing these sorts of articles).

In 5-6 months I suspect the consumer number to be down to 1-2 from the original batch, and those who are still paying will probably be doing so because the fact that the contract exists will probably slip through the cracks.

TheDong•30m ago
Even if it doesn't give any edge in terms of using the data, just paying money into Trump in more ways (i.e. a quasi-legal bribe) is enough of a benefit that I doubt many will drop it.

This is a lot cheaper of a bribe than i.e. the gold plaque Tim Apple gave to Trump too.

fragmede•18m ago
That thing probably only cost like $50K, so more than that.
HolyLampshade•5m ago
The trading firms don’t really get anything from bribing Trump. That’s not to say hedge funds don’t want to tickle the big guy’s ego, but they don’t need “faster data” in most cases.

It’s less directly beneficial than most people think it will be.

badatnames•29m ago
There is plenty of historical data, $100k is a steal for as long as situations like Iran persist. And now he is incentivised to ensure they do persist. Our fearless leader, ladies and gentlemen.
owebmaster•20m ago
> $100k is a steal

Literally

high_na_euv•31m ago
Trumps posts and actions have orders of magnitude more impact than random influencers with userbase of 5k
Aurornis•29m ago
I think you’re missing the point. The payment is for early access. The posts don’t go live for everyone else until after a delay.

This isn’t some penny stock group. It’s the president of the USA who has command of the largest army in the world and signals his intentions to make governmental moves with a large impact on the markets via these posts.

davidmurdoch•8m ago
On paper, this is just standard enterprise API access most social media services offer. Isn't it?
groundzeros2015•31m ago
Can you break down the participants in this story in Marxist terms?
ImHereToVote•19m ago
Sure. The bourgeoisie in search of more and more profit have nowhere left to go but ransack the heartland. Outward expansion has stalled at a wall called Iran.
cassepipe•4m ago
Reducing everything to a few sets of variables that you can keep in your mind is quite reassuring. Ask me how I know. Do take the time to assimilate this sentence though:

"But one should not succumb to the illusion that with an analysis of the fundamentals of the capitalist mode of production that everything decisive has already been said about capitalist societies"

Michael Heinrich, *Introduction to the three volumes of Capital"

•
6m ago
Yes. That’s a great historical precedent — Reconstruction was a hotly debated topic and the more radical forms would have banned former Confederate soldiers for voting, for example. Many Southern states had military governors imposed by the Federal government.

Andrew Johnson pardoned almost all Confederate leaders, didn’t care about freeing slaves, and is one of the worst Presidents in history.

twister2920•5m ago
> Was the Union army complicit in the crimes of the Confederacy by simply allowing them to drop their arms and walk away as well?

yes, they were. the USA if the Unionists has followed through on reconstruction looks like a utopia compared to now

llm_nerd•25m ago
This is such an amazing take because it is a constant in US politics. Like how in the world did you think it appropriate to pivot like this?

The standards for the Democrats are impossible perfection, regardless of the challenges.

The standards for the Republicans is...there are literally zero standards. Thieves, grifters, rapists, pedos, just the absolute worst human garbage imaginable, and somehow Americans convince themselves that if the Democrats don't (usually because they can't) do anything about it, clearly the Dems are the real problem, so it's time to vote Republicans. Just bizarre stuff.

I could give infinite examples where the slightest thing is a massive story about Democrat action or inaction, while every day is a new low in what the shit-pile that the modern Republican party gets away with. Benghazi is still constantly cited by the right, while Trump...Jesus Christ, every day is a thousand times worse. Astonishing levels of corruption and stupidity is just another Tuesday now.

It's amazing. Every framing somehow shifts like this.

swed420•15m ago
> The standards for the Democrats are impossible perfection

How do you figure? The previous Dem president literally promised, "nothing will fundamentally change" and that's exactly what happened.

We have a faux democracy / uniparty of capital interests where one "side" manufactures consent for the other.

rightwardRatchet++;

llm_nerd•10m ago
> How do you figure?

Biden was speaking to the people who ended up bankrolling Trump when threatened with slightly increased taxes, and who are going to dump billions into the midterms. When you're in a country that wavers around 50/50 every election (even when the choice is between competent government or a spectacularly incompetent shitshow of grifters, pedos and thieves), yes, there are limits to what you can realistically do in one election cycle.

In any case, it's actually hilarious that rhetoric like this "oh well actually the Dems are to blame because they haven't stopped them yet" is precisely why Republicans are gung ho in fighting against ranked choice ballots. A secret they've learned is to field some fringe bullshit candidates like Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr, Kanye, and so on, and they need the sort of idiots that vote for idiots like that to be throwing away their votes because "it's a uniparty of capital". Ranked choice ballots -- real democracy -- would threaten that.

https://www.adn.com/politics/2026/08/07/worlds-wealthiest-ma...

Trump has repeatedly claimed ranked choice ballots are "corrupt", and House Republicans have repeatedly tried to ban it. Do you want to know why? Protip - it's because they rely on incredibly stupid voters.

RicoElectrico•8m ago
Same in Poland, sadly. Conservatives or rather "conservatives" can get away with way more...
program_whiz•21m ago
(not a repub) I don't defend it, its outright fraud, but I also accept the reality that it is a more visible, and perhaps exaggerated, form of what has been ongoing forever.

Those who seek power seek it to: 1. Enrich themselves and their family 2. Wield it to achieve their means

The "pay to play" is rife everywhere. The contractors who get a sweet deal from local / fed government, the competition is stifled. The senators who make 10's of millions on insider information. The imminent domain cases where property is seized so corporation / donor can make millions. The "futures market" where insiders use their knowledge of product release date to swindle money for ordinary folks. The crypto scams, lotteries, casinos, street vendors, telemarketers, info-mercials, self-help gurus, snake oil sales, lemon peddlers, and more.

The truth is that the human system has not deviated far from the imposed hierarchy of feudalism / monarchy, we have only become better at concealing it, making it more potent in some ways. Power, corruption, opportunism, and greed are part of our nature. In an extremely large population with a democratic veneer, the levers of power become diffuse an ineffable, until they are blatantly shoved into our face.

In some ways I'm glad because its only through a constant vigilance and resetting the public vigilance that these kind of things can be controlled to any degree. Its an entropic force, seeping into the system at all times, only kept at bay by the disdain of the populace and fear in the hearts of the ruling elites.

Its definitely not a Republicans only phenomenon, the list on both sides of the aisle is embarrassingly long. But due to how our political system is setup, and human psychology, little will change by voting. People are tribal, and only have two choices in the matter, both of which are usually power-seeking corrupted. The prisoner's dilemma is giving the US a life-sentence.

317070•15m ago
> but I also accept the reality that it is a more visible, and perhaps exaggerated, form of what has been ongoing forever

Thanks for sharing this. It's a deep insight for me. I did not understand how the same people that were deeply skeptical about the state, ended up being so quiet when the state's corruption became flagrant and blatant. But this line of thinking makes a lot of sense.

spiderfarmer•13m ago
What will you vote in the midterms?
antiloper•13m ago
Why shouldn't there be? Depending on the poll you look at, republicans are polling around 40%: https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/state-of-the-union/ge...
muglug•12m ago
Not a Republican by any stretch of any imagination, but here’s my attempt at a steelman argument:

I imagine these companies were already spending some amount on crawlers that would poll every N milliseconds to get an edge on some market-moving post. In turn I imagine Truth Social were also spending more serving this bot traffic.

Truth Social making $1M a month from it — a rounding error in Trump’s fortunes — doesn’t seem like a world-ending catastrophe.

Trump has done many bad things to erode trust in our institutions and government. When compared to him trying to overturn the results of an election, this too seems like a rounding error.

OsrsNeedsf2P•9m ago
Not a Republican, but I support this behavior because I can't wait for more talent to leave the US
jazzypants•6m ago
You're not going to get a real response. They're here. They literally just ignore it. It's too inconvenient of a truth. It's much easier to just point fingers at poor immigrants than to actually give a shit about the corruption of rich people.
urams•6m ago
Were you similarly upset when Trump was only on Twitter and Twitter had an API?
ok123456•5m ago
The API was free then