frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Livenerf: Has Opus 5.5 been nerfed yet?

https://github.com/ninjahawk/livenerf
164•bryan0•2h ago•89 comments

NASA asked several former SR-71A staffers to help secret restart

https://aviationweek.com/defense/aircraft-propulsion/nasa-asked-several-former-sr-71a-staffers-he...
52•ilamont•14h ago•37 comments

U.S. postal inspectors shut down website selling counterfeit postage labels

https://postalemployeenetwork.com/news/2026/09/26/u-s-postal-inspectors-shut-down-website-selling...
165•ilamont•5h ago•86 comments

Vermont replacing power plants with home batteries

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260928-a-virtual-power-plant-hidden-in-vermont-homes-is-keep...
64•devonnull•6h ago•35 comments

GPT 6.1 Sol: Near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price

https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-6-1-sol/
767•crorella•7h ago•710 comments

Show HN: A working 3D model of an Enigma machine

https://enigma.design
29•primitivesuave•7h ago•3 comments

Show HN: Real-time Solar System with 526k asteroids and all tracked satellites

https://space.bl2.net/
94•wanick•5h ago•26 comments

America.gov

https://america.gov/
324•plesiv•10h ago•261 comments

How Delhi cut electricity loss from 50 to 5 percent

https://spectrum.ieee.org/delhi-electricity-loss
431•rbanffy•12h ago•250 comments

Needed 1+1, built a functional programming language

https://hereticpleb.vercel.app/blog/needed-one-plus-one/
18•birdculture•8h ago•3 comments

We’re forgetting what darkness feels like

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/sep/29/night-sky-darkness-city-regulation
36•pseudolus•6h ago•32 comments

NAND-16: a computer built from 277,248 NAND gates

https://somethingbig.ai/computer
109•rossant•2d ago•57 comments

PS5 Relapse Exploit

https://github.com/ntfargo/Relapse-Exploit
227•therepanic•9h ago•122 comments

Language models for text classification: From bag-of-words to Jev

https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/classifier-history-and-jev
22•Anon84•13h ago•0 comments

When oil prices spike, where does the money go?

https://theconversation.com/when-oil-prices-spike-where-does-the-money-go-280763
23•thelastgallon•20h ago•12 comments

UnoDOS

https://github.com/hmofet/unodos
14•nicoloren•2h ago•7 comments

A Privacy Analysis of Web and Mobile Conversational AI Agents [pdf]

https://jorgegarciaherrero.com/wp-content/interactivos/20260916-Prompt-like-a-butterfly-sting-lik...
407•damaru2•15h ago•129 comments

Backblaze drive stats for Q2 2026

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q2-2026/
65•HieronymusBosch•11h ago•7 comments

Phyllotaxis: An audio-reactive LED display

https://jagi.studio/posts/phyllotaxis/
258•evakhoury•1d ago•43 comments

Commodore 64: Mercenary

https://gamesexplained.com/c64/mercenary/
25•a1r•3d ago•5 comments

Deser: Rethinking Rust Serialization

https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/9/29/deser/
19•tosh•3h ago•6 comments

Tcl/Tk 9.1

https://www.tcl-lang.org/software/tcltk/9.1.html
235•dmux•7h ago•81 comments

Show HN: NSL – WSL for Linux

https://frostyard.github.io/nsl/
78•bketelsen•10h ago•60 comments

Ask HN: What are you reading?

122•dan-bailey•11h ago•336 comments

Virus Stole a Human Gene and Won't Let Go of It

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/science/virus-molluscum-human-gene.html
80•gumby•1d ago•31 comments

How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it

https://railcode.dev/blog/vibe-coded-website
52•yakkomajuri•1h ago•33 comments

A Staff Engineer's Guide to Inventing Work

https://sujithjay.com/inventing-work
178•amortize•1d ago•37 comments

Jeeves. Reasoning improves Jev-like decision models

https://github.com/PostHog/jeeves
224•nicowaltz•13h ago•85 comments

Dots: Always-on agents

https://openai.com/index/introducing-dots/
459•alvis•7h ago•348 comments

Stuck in the Suez Canal – the short version (2021)

https://cathsenker.co.uk/stuck-in-the-suez-canal-the-short-version/
38•joebig•2d ago•3 comments
Open in hackernews

NASA asked several former SR-71A staffers to help secret restart

https://aviationweek.com/defense/aircraft-propulsion/nasa-asked-several-former-sr-71a-staffers-help-secret-restart
48•ilamont•14h ago

Comments

DivingForGold•12h ago
Bet Tom Cruise will be offering to allow him to use it for an upcoming movie thrilla
rbanffy•8h ago
I wouldn’t mind, as long as the plane flies again.

It’s a true marvel of engineering.

tclancy•15m ago
Not a trick to make an old plane fly again. The trick is holding it together and landing it.

I would imagine the problem they have with the 70 year olds they’re trying to recruit is that there are old pilots and bold pilots but well, you know the rest.

pdonis•57m ago
Top Gun: Blackbird?
bitwize•51m ago
More like Mission: Impossible. Replete with a mini-doco about how Tom Cruise literally for reals skydove out of the Blackbird without a chute and landed on the enemy rocket in one take.
swader999•51m ago
It's for a new Pepsi promotion
bitwize•50m ago
That's a lotta Pepsi points esp. in this economy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_v._Pepsico%2C_Inc.

tclancy•16m ago
They finally going to make good?
Computer0•45m ago
Reading the article, this does seem ill-advised.
trevithick•40m ago
Why would they do this?

> And Lockheed’s operational manuals for the SR-71A still exist—and are superb...

I appreciate this level of documentation.

yodon•38m ago
The SR-71 is cool, but this article is not at all confidence inspiring on many fronts.

Guy being interviewed by a reporter about a secret project. A secret project that is trying to resurrect an antique plane that has been subject to weather and on display as a museum piece for many years.

It sounds like a clown-show staged around a cool looking plane that's older than 90+% of HN readers.

ceejayoz•32m ago
> It sounds like a clown-show…

Well, the President wants to redesign the Navy to look "cool" - battleships, carriers with steam catapults again and center islands. Why not the Air Force too?

Waterluvian•21m ago
If you’re gonna have an Air Farce we’ll have to tariff you guys, eh?
snypher•10m ago
I wish this were the case; if it were for cool points the F-117 would be back!
caidan•18m ago
It’s almost certainly being done by clowns on the orders of one of the clowns in chief. Note that quote, “I would drop everything to work on that” said guy who did not in fact drop anything to work on that. Reading between the lines I can hear old Mr loaf belting out “I would do anything for love, but I won’t do that!”
imglorp•
walrus01•35m ago
I'd be more astonished if there isn't something superior to the SR71 (likely unmanned) that has been flying around at night from facilities like Groom Lake for years. Look at how long the RQ180 was flying around in semi-public and known about before it became seen in daylight by plane spotters in Greece. And a long time before that there were public relations approved photos of the Lockheed Martin Polecat.

There were a series of extremely public quotations from senior DoD officially recently about how they plan to aggressively retire the Global Hawk program (which is a mostly non stealth aircraft), reading between the lines it's because they have something much better.

edit: for those who haven't seen the RQ180: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=RQ180+gre...

edit 2 (apologies for the X link): https://x.com/MechDesignxyz/status/2041281689838584193

hilsdev•32m ago
I suspect everything comparable of late has been orbital, which begs the question what is it they’re worried about with orbital? Satellite warfare is already accelerating if the rumors are true, is it that this is untouchable still? Is there some new camera sensor where eliminating that extra atmospheric diffraction or slowing down (lol) is needed?
walrus01•29m ago
I am sure that the orbital capabilities are also vastly improved from what the public has ever seen. But I think there's likely a high degree of tactical value in having something that can keep station over a certain active conflict area (as an RQ180 can, maybe flying in a racetrack pattern at altitude, with sensors aimed down).

If you've ever seen the publicly released videos and audio of an RQ9 operator in communication with ground units watching the activity of a group of men/vehicles on the ground, in live real time, something like that.

As compared to periodic revisits by LEO orbit satellites that don't maintain persistent live coverage, or the extreme distance and data acquisition problem that aiming sensors in geostationary orbit at a 10x10km target area might pose.

consumer451•34m ago
A-12 (Oxcart) pilots say that the SR-71 was the station wagon version :)
whatshisface•33m ago
As time goes on, Warhammer 40k will become a better and better guide to current events, apparently. Only one question: after recovering this lost standard template constructor pattern, how will the rites be learned to appease such a venerated machine spirit?
post-it•30m ago
There were a lot of things we couldn't do in an SR-71000...
0xbadcafebee•28m ago
To give you an idea how ridiculous this is: to start each engine, they made a cart out of two Buick V8 engines tied together - so four V8 engines to start the plane. Those V8 engines were long since out of production, so at one point they went around the country, to every junkyard, buying up every one of those V8s they could find, so they would have spares to start planes up in different places. If an SR71 had an issue and landed at an unusual airport, they had to fly the start cart and other equipment to that airport to start the plane again. Everything about this plane is expensive and one-of-a-kind. It's a hot rod that goes to space.
buildsjets•23m ago
NASA (Specifically, hotshot NASA administrator Jared Isaacman) is fixing to kill themselves some pilots.

Trivia, SR71 backseater Colonel Robert J. Roetcisender, RIP, on the right in the image below, was the designated pilot examiner who did my private pilot checkride many many years ago. It was pretty intimidating. All he asked is that I make the flight as boring as possible.

https://www.blackbirds.net/sr71/sr-crew-photos/SR71-crews/da...

gaigalas•15m ago
The new planes (F-35) were supposed to supersede interceptors like the SR-71 (that's their multirole goal). If it can't, this is an embarrassment.
flkiwi•13m ago
What? The SR-71 was a strategic reconnaissance aircraft. It was not, and never was, an interceptor. And the F-35 was never tasked with replacing an interceptor, but is a slow-ish multirole aircraft with a heavy emphasis on strike capability. And the USAF hasn't had an "interceptor" in decades (single mission, short range, high speed, point defense aircraft).
justin66•10m ago
[delayed]
anorphirith•7m ago
Nasa reported they're not restarting the actual plane, it would cost too much money, they're making a new one based on the SR-71
dzonga•6m ago
people behave like engineers grow on trees.

or processes can be restarted if they were not preserved and actively practiced.

11m ago
Clown show is my guess too. There's no utility for it other than rattling windows and other airshow shenanigans for bragging press releases.

There are faster (X-43 is mach 9.6 but unmanned) and higher and stealthier ships. But unless you're going to dip into the classified catalog, a rusty SR-71 is faster than the next fastest two ships which are both MiGs.

King-Aaron•27m ago
I know it's probably a forbidden topic around these parts, but the 'tic tac' thing that those FA18 pilots saw several years ago may be indicative of what Lockheed etc are flying up there. It's a hot topic in conspiracy circles but it wouldn't surprise me if a bulk load of ufo sightings were black projects being tested.
stickfigure•26m ago
> I'd be more astonished if there isn't something superior to the SR71

Makes me wonder if this whole operation is just public cover for something like that.

walrus01•25m ago
Or something as mundane as cleaning up and fixing something that's been out in the weather for 20 years so it doesn't look shabby at the front gate of their base.
Waterluvian•23m ago
I don’t know anything but I can’t imagine they need specialists if it’s just a cosmetics job for a monument.
walrus01•19m ago
Or the whole "retired guy in his late 70s gives a quotation to aviation week" is a red herring intended for US adversaries, which seems like a fairly basic ruse, but might have been put together as a coordinated plan. It could have its own value of sending opposing nation state intelligence agencies and air defense people down a man-hour wasting dead end of investigating something that'll never happen.
dreamcompiler•15m ago
If they were doing that they would say so. In fact if they were smart they would say that regardless of the true story. The fact they aren't saying that means they're either stupid or playing 4D chess. I know which I'd bet on.
tclancy•17m ago
The problem is the people in charge now have not earned that kind of faith. If they’re truly trying to relight these things, my heart goes out in advance to the neighborhood in the Southwest that burns down before they rethink it.