Patience, for one. I reach a point where I'm looking at a mess of coal-fed sorters that need a complete rip-and-replace with electric ones, and that's usually the point where I close the game and go back to something easier like Kenshi.
The tedium and repetition is really what kills the enjoyment for me. The problem solving, planning, forethought, etc are super fun but it's killed by the former.
It's fun if you have a handful of people playing, but it would quickly go towards negative reviews if you tried to sell it.
At most it should be mildly tweaking existing dialogue, e.g updating a line to reflect game events. But as soon as you present a prompt window to the player the entire illusion that you are in a game world instantly dies.
Is the weirdness of the designs meaningfully beneficial in any way that the AI has figured out, or could it for example be that the training data the LLMs learned from are too different from the type of data it would need to learn from in order to interface properly and play the game better? And then because of that incompleteness, the LLM has to hallucinate a lot and it results in weird outcomes.
The player character actually does have an extremely high capacity so if you are constantly running between chests your factory will still be reasonably high throughput.
Can you report more in depth at stumbling blocks? It's a surprisingly linear curve.
I'm going to try it on a local run.
I wonder if there is room for "recommendorio" where it gives you AI advice on your current factory.
Is the model pre-trained with any knowledge of the game?
Now I'm tempted to try again, because it feels like the kind of game I should really enjoy.
You can always enter creative mode and make whatever changes you want in the game instantly, but in my experience that does make it less fun.
Though these days I just manually clear the pollution cloud with a pocket full of turrets. The forward deployed engineer model, if you will.
These old basic algorithms often have mathematical proofs that they will converge to optimal behavior, and they do so fairly quickly. Turning the complex world of the game into a Q-table would require some creativity and judgement, but is not that hard I think.
In the end we would have a controllable AI that actually does adapt. That's my hope anyway.
same with the df artworks. get kitfox to design some art styles for dwarves, elves, goblins, and humans, and then instead of just reading
"this is a fine engraving of a dwarf. it concerns the events of 102 when ulrist fastbuttons was elected mayor. ulrist fastbuttons is sobbing"
mwt•51m ago
Robots: they're just like us!
8note•27m ago
youre not really sure how to set up some of the logistics/how much of what you will need where ahead of time
scrollaway•9m ago
jstummbillig•9m ago